Advertisement

Modelling and reference tracking of the robotic above-knee prosthetic leg with actuated knee and ankle joints during stair climbing

  • Zlata JelačićEmail author
  • Remzo Dedić
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The locomotion of people with amputation is slower, less stable and requires more metabolic energy than the locomotion of physically fit individuals. Individuals with amputation of the lower extremities fall more often than able individuals and often have difficulty moving on uneven terrain and stairs. These challenges can mostly be attributed to the use of passive mechanical prosthetic legs that do not react actively to perturbations. Latest submitted solutions for active prosthetic devices of the lower extremities can significantly improve mobility and quality of life for millions of people with lower limb amputation, but challenges in control mechanisms of such devices are currently limiting their clinical viability. In this paper we present a prototype of an above-knee prosthetic leg with active knee and ankle joints while using the proposed robust control law.

Keywords

Robust adaptive control Active prosthetic leg Actuated joints Reference tracking 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Murray RM, Li Z, Shankar SS. A mathematical introduction in robotic manipulation: CRC Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jelačić Z. Impedance control in the rehabilitation robotics. Book title: Advanced technologies, systems and applications II, ISBN 978-3-319-71320-5. Publisher: Springer International Publishing AG; Copyright year: 2018.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jelačić Z. Contribution to dynamic modelling and control of rehabilitation robotics through development of active hydraulic above-knee prosthesis. PhD thesis, Sarajevo, 2018.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rupar M, Jelačić Z, Dedić R, Vučina A. Power and control system of knee and ankle powered above knee prosthesis. 4th International Conference "New Technologies NT-2018" Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, B&H, 28th–30th June 2018.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goswami A, Thuilot B, Espiau B. A study of the passive gait of a compass-like biped robot: symmetry and chaos. Int J Robot Res. 1998;17(12):1282–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mochon S, McMahon TA. Ballistic walking. J Biomech. 1980;13(1):49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Minetti A, Moia C, Roi G, Susta D, Ferretti G. ˝Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. J Appl Phys. 2002;93(3):1039–46.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adamczyk P, Collins S, Kuo A. The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking. J Exp Biol. 2006;209(20):3953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Jelačić Z, Dedić R, Isić S, Husnić Ž. Matlab simulation of robust control for active above-knee prosthetic device. Book title: advanced technologies, systems and applications III, ISBN 978-3-030-02577-9. Publisher: Springer International Publishing AG; Copyright year: 2019.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jelačić Z. Scattering problem in the rehabilitation robotics control design. Mathematical Institute SANU, Mini-symposium "Stochastic oscillations and fatigue: theory and application", Belgrade; 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IUPESM and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of MechanicsUniversity of SarajevoSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical, Computer and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of MostarMostarBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations