Sociotechnical design for mobile anticoagulant therapy
In this paper we present MANTRA (Mobile ANticoagulant TheRApy), a project aimed at studying feasibility and acceptability of the introduction of mobile technology in the management of anticoagulant therapy involving both patients and health practitioners in their design. By the evaluation of the MANTRA Project, we developed a general approach to mHealth in the remote management of chronic diseases by supporting the communication among patients and healthcare practitioners. Patients usually have to make frequent visits to surgeries to meet nurses for the tests, and General Practitioners (GPs) for receiving drug prescriptions. We report on the implementation of the project as a proof of concept in London. A group of patients, General Practitioners, nurses, and healthcare assistants from the National Health Service (NHS) participated in design and evaluation phases. The distinct characteristics of the NHS as one of the world’s largest publicly funded health services posed a number of sociotechnical challenges to the design team. We present how we approached and addressed these challenges through MANTRA. Patients and Healthcare practitioners recognized the validity of our proposed design approach not only for supporting the remote therapy practice preserving an efficient and effective communication with the patients, but also as a way for better managing resources in anticoagulant clinics in the context of the NHS. With our research we explored the process that needs to be followed to develop a mobile system that would fit the sociotechnical ecosystem of anticoagulant therapy. Furthermore, we are now able to identify the changes that will be necessary in the ecosystem itself to make an effective use of the mobile system.
KeywordsAnticoagulant therapy Chronic diseases mHealth Mobile devices Sociotechnical design Telemedicinee
The MANTRA Project was funded by the Leverhulme Trust with a Visiting Fellowship for Barbara Rita Barricelli at the University of West London.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interests
The authors whose names are listed above certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers? bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The authors whose names are listed above certify that all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Project went under Ethical approval through the NHS and the University of West London in 2013.
The authors whose names are listed above certify that all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Project went under Ethical approval through the NHS and University of West London in 2013.
- 1.Abdelnour-Nocera J. 2007. The Social Construct of Usefulness: an intercultural study of producers and users of a business information system. VDM Verlag .Google Scholar
- 2.Barricelli BR, Devis Y, Abdelnour-Nocera J, Wilson J, Moore J. Mantra: mobile anticoagulant therapy management. 2013 7th international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare and workshops. IEEE; 2013. p. 278–281, https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2013.252096.
- 4.Bussey HI, Chiquette EM, B.T. Lowder-Bender K. A statistical and clinical evaluation of fingerstick and routine laboratory prothrombin time measurements. Pharmacotherapy 1997; 17 (5): 861–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-9114.1997.tb03775.x.
- 5.Callon M. 1986. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. Sheridan House.Google Scholar
- 7.Chen Y, Cheng K, Tang C, Siek KA, Bardram JE. Is my doctor listening to me?: Impact of health it systems on patient-provider interaction. CHI ’13 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA ’13. ACM; 2013. p. 2419–2426, https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468791.
- 8.Chen QL, Dong L, Dong YJ, Zhao SL, Fu B, Wang YQ, Jiang H. Security and cost comparison of inr self-testing and conventional hospital inr testing in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement. 2015; 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0205-1. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84928669219&doi=10.1186.
- 10.Cromheecke ME, Levi M, Colly LP, de Mol BJM, Prins MH, Hutten BA, Mak R, Keyzers KCJ, Büller H. R. Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic: a randomised cross-over comparison. Lancet 2000;356(9224):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02470-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dedding C, van Doorn R, Winkler L, Reis R. How will e-health affect patient participation in the clinic? a review of e-health studies and the current evidence for changes in the relationship between medical professionals and patients. Soc Sci Med 2011;72:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Duncan AS, Beabes MA. Contextual inquiry: grounding your design in user’s work. Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems: ACM Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 14.Eason K, Waterson P, Davda P. The sociotechnical challenge of integrating telehealth and telecare into health and social care for the elderly): IGI Global; 2015, pp. 1177–1189.Google Scholar
- 15.Ehn P. Work-Oriented Design of computer artifacts: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 1990.Google Scholar
- 18.Gerdes M, Martinez S, Smaradottir B, Fensli R, Jortveit J. Warfarin guide: Co-design of a mobile computer-assisted anticoagulant therapy. Stud Health Technol Inf 2017;245:1222. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-1222. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040511672&doi=10.3233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hansen TR. Strings of experiments: looking at the design process as a set of socio-technical experiments. In: Proceedings of PDC 2006. ACM; 2006, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
- 22.Heneghan C, Ward A, Perera R. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2012;379(9813):322–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61294-4. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84856387132&doi=10.1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Latour B. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
- 26.Law J, Hassard J. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.Google Scholar
- 29.Nagler M, Bachmann L, Schmid P, Raddatz Müller P, Wuillemin W. Patient self-management of oral anticoagulation with vitamin k antagonists in everyday practice: Efficacy and safety in a nationwide long-term prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095761. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899686376&doi=10.1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.NHS: National patient safety agency (npsa nhs) guide to setting up an anticoagulation clinic in primary care. Tech. rep., NHS; 2016. http://www.slcsn.nhs.uk/af/af-anticoagulation.html.
- 32.Nielsen J, Molich R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 1990 conference; 1990, pp. 249– 256.Google Scholar
- 33.Pozzi M, Mitchell J, Henaine A, Hanna N, Safi O, Henaine R. International normalized ratio self-testing and self-management: Improving patient outcomes. Vascul Health Risk Manag 2016; 12:387–392. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S85031. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84994453150&doi=10.2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Pruitt J, Grudin J. Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences (DUX ’03); 2003, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
- 35.Salvador CH, Ruiz-Sanchez A, de Mingo MAG, Carmona Rodriguez M, Carrasco MP, Sagredo PG, Fragua JA, Caballero-Martinez F, Garcia-Lopez F, Marquez-Montes J, Monteagudo JL. Evaluation of a telemedicine-based service for the follow-up and monitoring of patients treated with oral anticoagulant therapy. Trans Info Tech Biomed 2008;12(6):696–706. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2008.910750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Smaradottir B, Martinez S, Borycki E, Loudon G, Kushniruk A, Jortveit J. Fensli, R.: User evaluation of a smartphone application for anticoagulation therapy. Stud Health Technol Inf 2018; 247 : 466–470. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-852-5-466. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046543757&doi=10.3233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Thompson J, Sundt T, Sarano M, Santrach P, Schaff H. In-patient international normalized ratio self-testing instruction after mechanical heart valve implantation. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2008; 85(6):2046–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.01.051. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-43649089685&doi=10.1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Thompson J, Burkhart H, Daly R, Dearani J, Joyce L, Suri R, Schaff H. Anticoagulation early after mechanical valve replacement: Improved management with patient self-testing. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146(3):599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.03.088. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84881616330&doi=10.1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar