Advertisement

A new healthcare architecture using IoV technology for continuous health monitoring system

  • Tamizharasi ThirugnanamEmail author
  • Muhammad Rukunuddin Ghalib
Original Paper
  • 1 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Internet Of Medical Things In E-Health

Abstract

Technology development has improved to its extent for mobile monitoring that mainly concentrates on a new trend that named as the Internet of Vehicles (IoV).A large number of researchers and organizations are attracted by this technological development that promises to be huge commercial interest. Several health monitoring devices were developed for the purpose of humans to identify themselves about their health problems and state of the situation about their health. This paper proposes a new architecture design for the healthcare that mainly concentrates on heart diseases using the IoV technology. Here, the continuous health monitoring device is used to monitor heart-related diseases that connected with IoV for obtaining a new way to provide and gather information about their health condition and updated automatically to the IoV based ambulance and the reports are updated to doctors using the same IoV technique. The architecture explains the several protocols that were used for communication, managing and analysis of data and transmitting from vehicle to device.

Keywords

Internet of vehicles (IoV) Healthcare Wireless technologies Interaction model Network model Architecture layers 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mukhopadhyay, A., Raghunath, S., & Kruti, M. (2016). Feasibility and performance evaluation of VANET techniques to enhance real-time emergency healthcare services. In Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), 2016 International Conference on (pp. 2597–2603). IEEE.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kakria P, Tripathi NK, Kitipawang P. A real-time health monitoring system for remote cardiac patients using smartphone and wearable sensors. Int J Telemed Appl. 2015;2015:8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mukhopadhyay, A. (2017). QoS based telemedicine technologies for rural healthcare emergencies. In Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), 2017 IEEE (pp. 1–7). IEEE.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang W, Li Z, Zhang H, Wang S, Bie R. Vehicular ad hoc networks: architectures, research issues, methodologies, challenges, and trends. Int J Distrib Sens Netw. 2015;11(8):745303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang S, Liu Z, Li J, Wang S, Yang F. Anomaly detection for internet of vehicles: a trust management scheme with affinity propagation. Mob Inf Syst. 2016;2016.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rakhshan A, Pishro-Nik H. Improving safety on highways by customizing vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun. 2017;16(3).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamal, P., Raw, R. S., Singh, N., Kumar, S., & Kumar, A. (2016). VANET based health monitoring through wireless body sensor network. In Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 2016 3rd International Conference on (pp. 2865–2871). IEEE.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saha, J., Saha, A. K., Chatterjee, A., Agrawal, S., Saha, A., Kar, A., & Saha, H. N. (2018). Advanced IOT based combined remote health monitoring, home automation and alarm system. In Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), 2018 IEEE 8th Annual (pp. 602–606). IEEE.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xie Y, Ho IWH, Magsino ER. The modeling and cross-layer optimization of 802.11 p VANET unicast. IEEE Access. 2018;6:171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu N. Internet of vehicles: your next connection. Huawei WinWin. 2011;11:23–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bello O, Zeadally S. Intelligent device-to-device communication in the internet of things. IEEE Syst J. 2016;10(3):1172–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nanjie Lie. Internet of Vehicles your next connection. Huawei: WinWin Magazine. 2011;(11).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bonomi Flavio. The smart and connected vehicle and the Internet of Things. San José, CA: WSTS. 2013Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wan J, Zhang D, Zhao S, Yang L, Lloret J. Context-aware vehicular cyber-physical systems with cloud support: architecture, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Commun Mag. 2014;52(8):106–13.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaiwartya O, Abdullah AH, Cao Y, Altameem A, Prasad M, Lin CT, et al. Internet of vehicles: motivation, layered architecture, network model, challenges, and future aspects. IEEE Access. 2016;4:5356–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gandotra P, Jha RK, Jain S. A survey on device-to-device (D2D) communication: architecture and security issues. J Netw Comput Appl. 2017;78:9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gunasekaran Manogaran R, varatharajan, DaphneLopez, et al. A new architecture of Internet of Things and big data ecosystem for secured smart healthcare monitoring and alerting system. Future Generation System. 2018;(82):375–387.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ucar S, Ergen SC, Ozkasap O. Multihop-cluster-based IEEE 802.11 p and LTE hybrid architecture for VANET safety message dissemination. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2016;65(4):2621–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee S, Sriram K, Kim K, Kim YH, Golmie N. Vertical handoff decision algorithms for providing optimized performance in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2009;58(2):865–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li Z, Chen Y, Liu D, Li X. Performance analysis for an enhanced architecture of IoV via content-centric networking. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw. 2017;2017(1):124.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peters J, Beekers C, Eijk R, Edwards M, Hoogerwerf N. Evaluation of Dutch helicopter emergency medical services in transporting children. Air Med J. 2014;33(3):112–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sadi Y, Ergen SC. Optimal power control, rate adaptation, and scheduling for UWB-based intravehicular wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2013;62(1):219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Altintas, O., Nishibori, M., Oshida, T., Yoshimura, C., Fujii, Y., Nishida, K., ... & Oie, Y. (2011. Demonstration of vehicle to vehicle communications over TV white space. In Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), 2011 IEEE (pp. 1–3). IEEE.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nellore K, Hancke GP. Traffic management for emergency vehicle priority based on visual sensing. Sensors. 2016;16(11):1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IUPESM and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VIT UniversityVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations