An orientation free adaptive step detection algorithm using a smart phone in physical activity monitoring
- 364 Downloads
In this paper we present an Orientation Free Adaptive Step Detection (OFASD) algorithm for deployment in a smart phone for the purposes of physical activity monitoring. The OFASD algorithm detects individual steps and measures a user’s step counts using the smart phone’s in-built accelerometer. The algorithm considers both the variance of an individual’s walking pattern and the orientation of the smart phone. Experimental validation of the algorithm involved the collection of data from 10 participants using five phones (worn at five different body positions) whilst walking on a treadmill at a controlled speed for periods of 5 min. Results indicated that, for steps detected by the OFASD algorithm, there were no significant differences between where the phones were placed on the body (p > 0.05). The mean step detection accuracies ranged from 93.4 % to 96.4 %. Compared to measurements acquired using existing dedicated commercial devices, the results demonstrated that using a smart phone for monitoring physical activity is promising, as it adds value to an accepted everyday accessory, whilst imposing minimum interaction from the user. The algorithm can be used as the underlying component within an application deployed within a smart phone designed to promote self-management of chronic disease where activity measurement is a significant factor, as it provides a practical solution, with minimal requirements for user intervention and less constraints than current solutions.
KeywordsSmart phone Step detection Worn position Accelerometer Self-management
This work is supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under Grant EP/F001959/1.
- 2.World Health Organization: The world health report. Geneva. 2002.Google Scholar
- 7.Ying H, Silex C, Schnitzer A, Leonhardt S, Schiek M. Automatic step detection in the accelerometer signal. The 4th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. 2007. pp 80–85.Google Scholar
- 11.Tsavourelou A, Rowe P, Babatsikou F, Koutis C. Validation of the activPAL in the health promotion context. Health Sci J. 2009;3(2):105–14.Google Scholar
- 16.Burns W, Nugent CD, McCullagh PJ, Zheng H, Black ND, Wright P, Mountain GA. Home based self-management of chronic diseases. The 7th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics (ICOST). 2009. pp 229–232.Google Scholar
- 18.Zheng H, Nugent CD, McCullagh PJ, Burns WP, Alexander S, Huang Y, Zhang S, Black ND, Vowles KE, Mawson SJ, Eccleston C, Wright P, Mountain GA. Integration of assistive technology to support self management. The IET conference on Assisted Living. 2009. pp 14–17.Google Scholar
- 19.Bardram JE, Mihailidis A, Wan D. Pervasive computing in healthcare. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 20.Germanakos P, Mourlas C, Samaras G. A mobile agent approach for ubiquitous and personalized eHealth information systems. The Workshop on Personalization for e-Health of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling. Edinburgh, 2005. pp 67–70.Google Scholar
- 21.Ingensand H, Mautz R. Message of the conference directors. International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). Zurich, Switzerland. 2010.Google Scholar
- 22.Shin SH, Kim HW, Park CG, Yoo YM. Sit-down and stand-up awareness algorithm for the Pedestrian Dead Reckoning. Naples, Italy: The European Navigation Conference - ENC-GNCC; 2009.Google Scholar
- 23.Mladenov M, Mock M. A step counter service for Java-enabled devices using a built-in accelerometer. The 1st International Workshop on Context-Aware Middleware and Services. 2009.Google Scholar
- 24.Huang Y, Zheng H, Nugent CD, McCullagh PJ, McDonough SM, Tully MA, Connor SO. Activity monitoring using an intelligent mobile phone – a validation study. The 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 2010.Google Scholar
- 26.Boyd J, Sundaram H. A framework to detect and classify activity transitions in low-power applications. The IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. 2009. pp. 1712–1715.Google Scholar
- 27.Yang M, Zheng H, Wang H, McClean S, Harris N. Assessing the utility of smart mobile phones in gait pattern analysis. J Health Technol. 2012. doi: 10.1007/s12553-012-0021-8.
- 29.Brooks GA, Butte NF, Rand WM, Flatt JP, Caballero B. Chronicle of the Institute of Medicine physical activity recommendation: how a physical activity recommendation came to be among dietary recommendations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(5):921S–30S.Google Scholar