Advertisement

Health and Technology

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 147–157 | Cite as

What patients want: relevant health information technology for diabetes self-management

  • Diane K. King
  • Deborah J. Toobert
  • Jennifer Dickman Portz
  • Lisa A. Strycker
  • Alyssa Doty
  • Carmen Martin
  • Jennifer M. Boggs
  • Andrew J. Faber
  • Cristy R. Geno
  • Russell E. Glasgow
Original Paper

Abstract

Health information technology has great potential to promote efficiency in patient care and increase patient-provider communication, and patient engagement in their treatment. This paper explored qualitatively what patients with type 2 diabetes want from electronic resources that are designed to support their diabetes self-management. Data were collected via interviews and focus groups from managed care patients who had completed participation in either a web-based (MyPath) or in-person group-based (¡Viva Bien!) longitudinal diabetes self-management study. Content analysis identified common themes that highlighted participant interest in virtual and electronic programs to support diabetes self-management goals, and their desired content and features. Eighteen ¡Viva Bien! participants completed telephone interviews and 30 MyPath participants attended seven focus groups in 2010-2011. All participants expressed a preference for face-to-face contact; however, most participants were also interested in using technology as a tool to support daily diabetes self-management decisions and to receive tailored information. Choice of technology, personalized instruction on how to use program features, and the ability to exchange information with their healthcare team were desired by all participants. Participants were divided on whether virtual social support networks should be closed to friends and family, should include other program members (peers), or should be open to anyone with diabetes. Participants aged 65 and older stressed the desire for technical support. What patients wanted from technology is real-time assistance with daily behavioral decision-making, ability to share information with their healthcare team, connections with others for support, and choice.

Keywords

Technology Diabetes Self-management Health behavior change 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The ¡Viva Bien! study was supported by grant HL077120 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The MyPath study was supported by grant DK35524 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Boucher JL. Technology and patient-provider interactions: improving quality of care, but is it improving communication and collaboration? Diabetes Spectrum. 2010;23(3):142–4.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: National estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf . Accessed 8-17-11
  4. 4.
    Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–e209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):917–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chin MH, Cook S, Jin L, Drum ML, Harrison JF, Koppert J, et al. Barriers to providing diabetes care in community health centers. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(2):268–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Powell MP, Glover SH, Probst JC, Laditka SB. Barriers associated with the delivery of Medicare-reimbursed diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(6):890–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piette J. Interactive behavior change technology to support diabetes self-management. Where do we stand? Diabetes Care. 2007;30(10):2425–32.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wagner J. Behavioral interventions to promote diabetes self-management. Diabetes Spectrum. 2011;24:61–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jansink R, Braspenning J, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G, Grol R. Primary care nurses struggle with lifestyle counseling in diabetes care: a qualitative analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolasa KM, Rickett K. Barriers to providing nutrition counseling cited by physicians: a survey of primary care practitioners. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(5):502–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silberman A, Banthia R, Estay IS, Kemp C, Studley J, Hareras D, et al. The effectiveness and efficacy of an intensive cardiac rehabilitation program in 24 sites. Am J Health Promot. 2010;24(4):260–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lorig KR, Hurwicz ML, Sobel D, Hobbs M, Ritter PL. A national dissemination of an evidence-based self-management program: a process evaluation study. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;59(1):69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Barrera Jr M, Osuna D, King DK, Glasgow RE. Outcomes from a multiple-risk-factor diabetes self-management trial for Latinas: ¡Viva Bien! Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(3):310–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toobert DJ, Glasgow R, Strycker LA, Barrera Jr M, Radcliffe JL, Wander RC, et al. Biologic and quality-of-life outcomes from the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(8):2288–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finkelstein J, Barr MS, Kothari PP, Nace DK, Quinn M. Patient-centered medical home cyberinfrastructure current and future landscape. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5 Suppl 2):S225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reid RJ, Fishman PA, Yu O, Ross TR, Tufano JT, Soman MP, et al. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(9):e71–87.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seidman J, Eytan T. Helping patients plug in: lessons in the adoptions of online consumer tools. Oakland: California Health Care Foundation; 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schillinger D, Handley M, Wang F, Hammer H. Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes: a three-arm practical clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(4):559–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    U.S.Census Bureau. Reported Internet usage for households by selected householder characteristics. http://www.census gov/hhes/computer/publications/2009.html. Accessed 8-17-11(October).
  21. 21.
    Ahern DK, Woods SS, Lightowler MC, Finley SW, Houston TK. Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5 Suppl 2):S162–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strecher V. Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth). Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bonander J, Gates S. Public health in an era of personal health records: opportunities for innovation and new partnerships. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(3):e33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M. Why are health care interventions delivered over the Internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chua HF, Polk T, Welsh R, Liberzon I, Strecher V. Neural responses to elements of a web-based smoking cessation program. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;144:174–8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oenema A, Brug J, Dijkstra A, de Weerdt I, De Vries H. Efficacy and use of an internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention, targeting saturated fat intake, physical activity and smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(2):125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vandelanotte C, DeBourdeaudhuij I, Brug J. Two-year follow-up of sequential and simultaneous interactive computer-tailored interventions for increasing physical activity and decreasing fat intake. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(2):213–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Redding C, Rossi JS, Goldstein M, DePue J, et al. Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Prev Med. 2005;41(2):406–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King DK, Dickman JM, Faber AJ, Halterman E, et al. Outcomes of a minimal versus moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(12):1315–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Glasgow RE, Edwards LL, Whitesides H, Carroll N, Sanders TJ, McCray BL. Reach and effectiveness of DVD and in-person diabetes self-management education. Chronic Illn. 2009;5:243–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(2):202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Standards for Patient-centered Medical Home (PCMH). Accessed 8-17-11. Washington, D.C.: 2011.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Okoro CA, Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Vinicor F, Giles WH. Are persons with diabetes practicing healthier behaviors in the year 2001? Results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Prev Med. 2004;38(2):203–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, Carnethon M, Daniels S, Franch HA, et al. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation. 2006;114(1):82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chiuve SE, McCullough ML, Sacks FM, Rimm EB. Healthy lifestyle factors in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease among men: benefits among users and nonusers of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications. Circulation. 2006;114(2):160–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Richardson CR, Kriska AM, Lantz PM, Hayward RA. Physical activity and mortality across cardiovascular disease risk groups. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(11):1923–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Krishna S, Boren SA. Diabetes self-management care via cell phone: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(3):509–17.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD004274.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gibbons M, Wilson R, Samal L, Lehmann CU, Dickersin K, Lehmann HP, et al. Consumer health informatics: results of a systematic evidence review and evidence based recommendations. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1:72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Biem HJ, Turnell RW, D’Arcy C. Computer telephony: automated calls for medical care. Clin Invest Med. 2003;26(5):259–68.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Piette JD. Satisfaction with automated telephone disease management calls and its relationship to their use. Diabetes Educ. 2000;26:1003–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Balas EA, Jaffrey F, Kuperman GJ, Boren SA, Brown GD, Pinciroli F, et al. Electronic communication with patients: evaluation of distance medicine technology. JAMA. 1997;278(2):152–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McBride CM, Rimer BK. Using the telephone to improve health behavior and health service delivery. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Morris ME, Kathawala Q, Leen TK, Gorenstein EE, Guilak F, Labhard M, et al. Mobile therapy: case study evaluations of a cell phone application for emotional self-awareness. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S, et al. Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;175:1–1422.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pare G, Moqadem K, Pineau G, St-Hilaire C. Clinical effects of home telemonitoring in the context of diabetes, asthma, heart failure and hypertension: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kim HS, Kim NC, Ahn SH. Impact of a nurse short message service intervention for patients with diabetes. J Nurs Care Qual. 2006;21(3):266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hurling R, Catt M, Boni MD, Fairley BW, Hurst T, Murray P, et al. Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    van den Berg MH, Schoones JW, Vliet Vlieland TP. Internet-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Durso SC, Wendel I, Letzt AM, Lefkowitz J, Kaseman DF, Seifert RF. Older adults using cellular telephones for diabetes management: a pilot study. Medsurg Nurs. 2003;12(5):313–7.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Walker EA, Shmukler C, Ullman R, Blanco E, Scollan-Koliopoulus M, Cohen HW. Results of a successful telephonic intervention to improve diabetes control in urban adults: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, Mah CA, Kraemer FB, Crapo LM. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med. 2000;108(1):20–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    van Bastelaar KM, Pouwer F, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Snoek FJ. Web-based depression treatment for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(2):320–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hampton KN, Goulet LS, Rainie L, Purcell K. Social networking sites and our lives: How people’s trust, personal relationships, and civic and political involvement are connected to their use of social networking sites and other technologies. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP%20-%20Social%20networking%20sites%20and%20our%20lives.pdf. Accessed 8-18-11
  57. 57.
    Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006;44(11):964–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fukuoka Y, Kamitani E, Bonnet K, Lindgren T. Real-time social support through a mobile virtual community to improve healthy behavior in overweight and sedentary adults: a focus group analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chapman LS, Rowe D, Witte K. eHealth portals: who uses them and why? Am J Health Promot. 2010; 24(5):TAHP1-7, iii.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rabin BA, Glasgow RE. Dissemination of interactive health communication programs. In: Noar SM, Harrington NG, editors. Interactive health communication technologies: promising strategies for health behavior change. First Edition ed. Routledge; 2012. p. In press.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Carroll M, Cullen T, Ferguson S, Hogge N, Horton M, Kokesh J. Innovation in Indian healthcare: using health information technology to achieve health equity for American Indian and Alaska Native populations. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011;8:1d.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Smith A. Mobile access 2010. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Access-2010.aspx [2011 (Pew Internet & American Life Project, July 5, 2010). Accessed 8-18-11]
  64. 64.
    Smith A. Smartphone adoption and usage. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Smartphones.aspx. 2011 (Pew Internet & American Life Project, July 11, 2011). Accessed 8-18-11.
  65. 65.
    Chou WY, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Crilly JF, Keefe RH, Volpe F. Use of electronic technologies to promote community and personal health for individuals unconnected to health care systems. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(7):1163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gracia E, Herrero J. Internet use and self-rated health among older people: a national survey. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Van’t RJ, Crutzen R, de VH. Investigating predictors of visiting, using, and revisiting an online health-communication program: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(3):e37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Albright CL, Pruitt L, Castro C, Gonzalez A, Woo S, King AC. Modifying physical activity in a multiethnic sample of low-income women: one-year results from the IMPACT (Increasing Motivation for Physical ACTivity) project. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(3):191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rainie L. Internet, broadband, and cell phone statistics. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Internet-broadband-and-cell-phone-statistics.aspx. 2010 (Pew Internet & American Life Project, Jan 5, 2010). Accessed 8-18-11.
  71. 71.
    Tirado M. Role of mobile health in the care of culturally and linguistically diverse US populations. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011;8:1e.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Green M, Jernigan VB, et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1275–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jernigan VBB, Lorig K. The Internet diabetes self-management workshop for American Indians and Alaska natives. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12(2):261–70.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Piette J. Enhancing support via interactive technologies. Curr Diab Rep. 2002;2:160–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Piette JD. Patient education via automated calls: a study of English and Spanish speakers with diabetes. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17(2):138–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Piette JD, Heisler M. The relationship between older adults’ knowledge of their drug coverage and medication cost problems. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(1):91–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Piette JD, Mendoza-Avelares MO, Ganser M, Mohamed M, Marinec N, Krishnan S. A preliminary study of a cloud-computing model for chronic illness self-care support in an underdeveloped country. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):629–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Desmond SM, Gold RS, Billing AS, Tian J. Rural eHealth nutrition education for limited-income families: an iterative and user-centered design approach. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jensen JD, King AJ, Davis LA, Guntzviller LM. Utilization of internet technology by low-income adults: the role of health literacy, health numeracy, and computer assistance. J Aging Health. 2010;22(6):804–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Jensen JD, King AJ, Guntzviller LM, Davis LA. Patient-provider communication and low-income adults: age, race, literacy, and optimism predict communication satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(1):30–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Robroek SJ, Brouwer W, Lindeboom D, Oenema A, Burdorf A. Demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial correlates of using the website component of a worksite physical activity and healthy nutrition promotion program: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(3):e44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Stevenson FA, Kerr C, Murray E, Nazareth I. Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective–a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(4):336–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Kearney KA, Reid R, Ritzwoller DP, Strecher VJ, et al. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Verheijden MW, Jans MP, Hildebrandt VH, Hopman-Rock M. Rates and determinants of repeated participation in a web-based behavior change program for healthy body weight and healthy lifestyle. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(1):e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Danaher BG, Seeley JR. Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(1):28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de NJ, de Vries NK, Brug J, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Glasgow RE, Christiansen S, Kurz D, King D, Woolley T, Faber A, et al. Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: Usage patterns and generalizability of program use. J Internet Med Res. 2011;13(1):e9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Fisher L, Glasgow RE. A call for more effectively integrating behavioral and social science principles into comprehensive diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(10):2746–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1833–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tate DF, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost-effectiveness of Internet interventions: review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(1):40–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    King DK, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Estabrooks PA, Osuna D, et al. Self-efficacy, problem solving, and social-environmental support are associated with diabetes self-management behaviors. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):751–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Osuna D, Doty AT, Barrera M, et al. Viva bien!: Overcoming recruitment challenges in a multiple-risk-factor diabetes trial. Am J Health Behav. 2010;34(4):432–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, King DK, Barrera M Jr., Osuna D, Glasgow RE. Long-term outcomes from a multiple-risk-factor diabetes trial for Latinas: ¡Viva Bien! Transl Behav Med. 2011;Published online January 12, 2011(doi: 10.1007/s13142-010-0011-1).
  97. 97.
    Ritzwoller DP, Sukhanova A, Gaglio B, Glasgow RE. Costing behavioral interventions: a practical guide to enhance translation. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(2):218–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2009.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice. 2000;39(3):124–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Padgett DK. Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IUPESM and Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane K. King
    • 1
  • Deborah J. Toobert
    • 2
  • Jennifer Dickman Portz
    • 3
  • Lisa A. Strycker
    • 2
  • Alyssa Doty
    • 3
  • Carmen Martin
    • 3
  • Jennifer M. Boggs
    • 3
  • Andrew J. Faber
    • 3
  • Cristy R. Geno
    • 3
  • Russell E. Glasgow
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Behavioral Health Research and ServicesUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Research InstituteEugeneUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente ColoradoDenverUSA
  4. 4.National Cancer InstituteRockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations