Inter-racial Gateways: The Potential of Biracials to Reduce Threat and Prejudice in Inter-racial Dynamics
We test the notion that the presence of a dual identity group, which partially shares both the ingroup and a relevant outgroup identity, can decrease intergroup prejudice. Previous research has demonstrated that such dual identity groups can act as a possible gateway between the groups that represent the respective sources of the dual identity. The current research applies this notion to the inter-racial context in the United States, focusing on the case of biracial individuals as having dual identities, and thus as potential gateways between blacks and whites. Specifically, we tested the prediction that exposure of whites to biracial individuals would decrease intergroup threat which in turn would decrease prejudice toward blacks. Findings from three studies supported this prediction and showed that the presence of biracial individuals reduced intergroup threat and prejudice among those most likely to harbor them (specifically, those high on social dominance orientation). We discuss the implications of our findings in terms of how this effect corresponds with current theoretical developments on dual identity, and possible practical social implications.
KeywordsBiracial Gateway group Prejudice Social dominance orientation Dual identity Racism
This work was supported by the Israeli Science Fund Grant (Grant Number 1772/14) awarded to the last author, and by the European Research Council Grant awarded to the second author (Grant No. 335607).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Research Involving Animal Studies
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Bogardus, E. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology & Social Research, 17, 265–271.Google Scholar
- Cillizza, C. (2017, August 13). Donald Trump’s incredibly unpresidential statement on Charlottesville. CNN. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/12/politics/trump-charlottesville-statement/index.html.
- Davis, F. J. (2010). Who is black?: One nation’s definition. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
- Fleischmann, F., & Phalet, K. (2012). Integration and religiosity among the Turkish second generation in Europe: A comparative analysis across four capital cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(2), 320–341.Google Scholar
- Halperin, E. (2016). Emotions in Conflict: Inhibitors and Facilitators of Peace Making. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper].Google Scholar
- Pratto, F., Çidam, A., Stewart, A. L., Zeineddine, F. B., Aranda, M., Aiello, A., et al. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33(47), 74.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2015). Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.html.