Race and Social Problems

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 161–180

Racial Disparities in US Infant Birth Outcomes: A Protective Effect of Military Affiliation?

  • Jennifer Lundquist
  • Irma Elo
  • Wanda Barfield
  • Zhun Xu

DOI: 10.1007/s12552-013-9108-8

Cite this article as:
Lundquist, J., Elo, I., Barfield, W. et al. Race Soc Probl (2014) 6: 161. doi:10.1007/s12552-013-9108-8


Research has been unable to determine why African Americans have higher infant mortality and preterm birth prevalence than whites, even taking into account measurable social and economic differences. This is, in part, due to the difficulty of adequately measuring the impacts of racial inequality and residential segregation. As an alternative approach, this paper comparatively examines infant outcomes among military-affiliated and civilian black and white women. The military setting provides higher-than-average economic equality and universal healthcare access. Although military-affiliated populations are usually left out of most major datasets, we construct a new variable that allows us to identify military affiliation using the CDC’s PRAMS survey data. Multinomial logistic regression analyses show that there is a negative association between adverse birth outcomes and military affiliation for both white and black women. Thus, the black-white infant mortality gap persists in the military even though black affiliates experience significant improvement in outcomes relative to their same-race civilian counterparts. Nevertheless, the black-white disparity among military-affiliated women is somewhat lessened compared to the black-white civilian disparity.


US racial disparities Infant mortality Preterm birth Military 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Lundquist
    • 1
  • Irma Elo
    • 2
  • Wanda Barfield
    • 3
  • Zhun Xu
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Social Science Research (ISSR)University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.University of Pennsylvania’s Population CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.CDC’s Division of Reproductive HealthAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Renmin University of China BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations