Biophysical Reviews

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 391–410 | Cite as

Hierarchical design of artificial proteins and complexes toward synthetic structural biology

Review

Abstract

In multiscale structural biology, synthetic approaches are important to demonstrate biophysical principles and mechanisms underlying the structure, function, and action of bio-nanomachines. A central goal of “synthetic structural biology” is the design and construction of artificial proteins and protein complexes as desired. In this paper, I review recent remarkable progress of an array of approaches for hierarchical design of artificial proteins and complexes that signpost the path forward toward synthetic structural biology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Topics covered include combinatorial and protein-engineering approaches for directed evolution of artificial binding proteins and membrane proteins, binary code strategy for structural and functional de novo proteins, protein nanobuilding block strategy for constructing nano-architectures, protein–metal–organic frameworks for 3D protein complex crystals, and rational and computational approaches for design/creation of artificial proteins and complexes, novel protein folds, ideal/optimized protein structures, novel binding proteins for targeted therapeutics, and self-assembling nanomaterials. Protein designers and engineers look toward a bright future in synthetic structural biology for the next generation of biophysics and biotechnology.

Keywords

Artificial protein and complex Combinatorial library Computational design Directed evolution Hierarchical design Protein engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank all colleagues and collaborators, especially, Dr. Naoya Kobayashi and Dr. Nobuyasu Koga at Institute for Molecular Science (IMS), Prof. Michael H. Hecht at Princeton University, Dr. Shinya Honda at Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, and Dr. Tomoaki Matsuura at Osaka University for their help and valuable discussion. I apologize to the protein designers and protein engineers whose works I was unable to acknowledge due to space and scope limitations. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP16K05841 and JP16H00761 (an Innovative Area, “Dynamical Ordering and Integrated Functions”), and Joint Research by IMS.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Ryoichi Arai declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

References

  1. Abe S, Ueno T (2015) Design of protein crystals in the development of solid biomaterials. RSC Adv 5:21366–21375Google Scholar
  2. Abe S, Maity B, Ueno T (2016) Design of a confined environment using protein cages and crystals for the development of biohybrid materials. Chem Commun 52:6496–6512Google Scholar
  3. Ahnert SE, Marsh JA, Hernandez H, Robinson CV, Teichmann SA (2015) Principles of assembly reveal a periodic table of protein complexes. Science 350:aaa2245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anfinsen CB (1973) Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181:223–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arai R, Kobayashi N, Kimura A, Sato T, Matsuo K, Wang AF, Platt JM, Bradley LH, Hecht MH (2012) Domain-swapped dimeric structure of a stable and functional de novo four-helix bundle protein, WA20. J Phys Chem B 116:6789–6797PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Arisaka F, Yap ML, Kanamaru S, Rossmann MG (2016) Molecular assembly and structure of the bacteriophage T4 tail. Biophys Rev 8:385–396PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bailey JB, Subramanian RH, Churchfield LA, Tezcan FA (2016) Metal-directed Design of Supramolecular Protein Assemblies. Methods Enzymol 580:223–250PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey JB, Zhang L, Chiong JA, Ahn S, Tezcan FA (2017) Synthetic modularity of protein-metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 139:8160–8166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker D (2010) An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci 19:1817–1819Google Scholar
  10. Baker D (2014) Protein folding, structure prediction and design. Biochem Soc Trans 42:225–229Google Scholar
  11. Bale JB, Gonen S, Liu Y, Sheffler W, Ellis D, Thomas C, Cascio D, Yeates TO, Gonen T, King NP, Baker D (2016) Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes. Science 353:389–394PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bender BJ, Cisneros A 3rd, Duran AM, Finn JA, Fu D, Lokits AD, Mueller BK, Sangha AK, Sauer MF, Sevy AM, Sliwoski G, Sheehan JH, DiMaio F, Meiler J, Moretti R (2016) Protocols for molecular Modeling with Rosetta3 and RosettaScripts. Biochemistry 55:4748–4763PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bessette PH, Rice JJ, Daugherty PS (2004) Rapid isolation of high-affinity protein binding peptides using bacterial display. Protein Eng Des Sel 17:731–739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bick MJ, Greisen PJ, Morey KJ, Antunes MS, La D, Sankaran B, Reymond L, Johnsson K, Medford JI, Baker D (2017) Computational design of environmental sensors for the potent opioid fentanyl. elife 6:e28909PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Boder ET, Wittrup KD (1997) Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat Biotechnol 15:553–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Boersma YL, Pluckthun A (2011) DARPins and other repeat protein scaffolds: advances in engineering and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:849–857PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Boucher JI, Bolon DN, Tawfik DS (2016) Quantifying and understanding the fitness effects of protein mutations: laboratory versus nature. Protein Sci 25:1219–1226PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Bowers PM, Strauss CE, Baker D (2000) De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data. J Biomol NMR 18:311–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Boyken SE, Chen Z, Groves B, Langan RA, Oberdorfer G, Ford A, Gilmore JM, Xu C, DiMaio F, Pereira JH, Sankaran B, Seelig G, Zwart PH, Baker D (2016) De novo design of protein homo-oligomers with modular hydrogen-bond network-mediated specificity. Science 352:680–687PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Bradley LH, Kleiner RE, Wang AF, Hecht MH, Wood DW (2005) An intein-based genetic selection allows the construction of a high-quality library of binary patterned de novo protein sequences. Protein Eng Des Sel 18:201–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Brodin JD, Ambroggio XI, Tang C, Parent KN, Baker TS, Tezcan FA (2012) Metal-directed, chemically tunable assembly of one-, two- and three-dimensional crystalline protein arrays. Nat Chem 4:375–382PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Brodin JD, Smith SJ, Carr JR, Tezcan FA (2015) Designed, helical protein Nanotubes with variable diameters from a single building block. J Am Chem Soc 137:10468–10471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Brunette TJ, Parmeggiani F, Huang PS, Bhabha G, Ekiert DC, Tsutakawa SE, Hura GL, Tainer JA, Baker D (2015) Exploring the repeat protein universe through computational protein design. Nature 528:580–584PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bryson JW, Betz SF, Lu HS, Suich DJ, Zhou HX, O'Neil KT, DeGrado WF (1995) Protein design: a hierarchic approach. Science 270:935–941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Burgess NC, Sharp TH, Thomas F, Wood CW, Thomson AR, Zaccai NR, Brady RL, Serpell LC, Woolfson DN (2015) Modular Design of Self-Assembling Peptide-Based Nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 137:10554–10562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Burton AJ, Thomson AR, Dawson WM, Brady RL, Woolfson DN (2016) Installing hydrolytic activity into a completely de novo protein framework. Nat Chem 8:837–844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cherny I, Korolev M, Koehler AN, Hecht MH (2012) Proteins from an unevolved library of de novo designed sequences bind a range of small molecules. ACS Synth Biol 1:130–138PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Chevalier A, Silva DA, Rocklin GJ, Hicks DR, Vergara R, Murapa P, Bernard SM, Zhang L, Lam KH, Yao G, Bahl CD, Miyashita SI, Goreshnik I, Fuller JT, Koday MT, Jenkins CM, Colvin T, Carter L, Bohn A, Bryan CM, Fernandez-Velasco DA, Stewart L, Dong M, Huang X, Jin R, Wilson IA, Fuller DH, Baker D (2017) Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics. Nature 550:74–79PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Churchfield LA, Medina-Morales A, Brodin JD, Perez A, Tezcan FA (2016) De novo design of an allosteric metalloprotein assembly with strained disulfide bonds. J Am Chem Soc 138:13163–13166Google Scholar
  30. Crick FHC (1953a) The Fourier transform of a coiled-coil. Acta Crystallogr 6:685–689Google Scholar
  31. Crick FHC (1953b) The packing of α-helices: simple coiled-coils. Acta Crystallogr 6:689–697Google Scholar
  32. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL (1997) De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 278:82–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Das R, Baker D (2008) Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. Annu Rev Biochem 77:363–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. de Bono S, Riechmann L, Girard E, Williams RL, Winter G (2005) A segment of cold shock protein directs the folding of a combinatorial protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:1396–1401PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Digianantonio KM, Hecht MH (2016) A protein constructed de novo enables cell growth by altering gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:2400–2405PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Digianantonio KM, Korolev M, Hecht MH (2017) A non-natural protein rescues cells deleted for a key enzyme in central metabolism. ACS Synth Biol 6:694–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. DiMaio F, Leaver-Fay A, Bradley P, Baker D, Andre I (2011) Modeling symmetric macromolecular structures in Rosetta3. PLoS ONE 6:e20450PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Doyle L, Hallinan J, Bolduc J, Parmeggiani F, Baker D, Stoddard BL, Bradley P (2015) Rational design of alpha-helical tandem repeat proteins with closed architectures. Nature 528:585–588PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Fallas JA, Ueda G, Sheffler W, Nguyen V, McNamara DE, Sankaran B, Pereira JH, Parmeggiani F, Brunette TJ, Cascio D, Yeates TR, Zwart P, Baker D (2017) Computational design of self-assembling cyclic protein homo-oligomers. Nat Chem 9:353–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Fisher MA, McKinley KL, Bradley LH, Viola SR, Hecht MH (2011) De novo designed proteins from a library of artificial sequences function in Escherichia coli and enable cell growth. PLoS ONE 6:e15364PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Fleishman SJ, Whitehead TA, Ekiert DC, Dreyfus C, Corn JE, Strauch EM, Wilson IA, Baker D (2011) Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science 332:816–821PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Fletcher JM, Harniman RL, Barnes FR, Boyle AL, Collins A, Mantell J, Sharp TH, Antognozzi M, Booth PJ, Linden N, Miles MJ, Sessions RB, Verkade P, Woolfson DN (2013) Self-assembling cages from coiled-coil peptide modules. Science 340:595–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Forsyth CM, Juan V, Akamatsu Y, DuBridge RB, Doan M, Ivanov AV, Ma Z, Polakoff D, Razo J, Wilson K, Powers DB (2013) Deep mutational scanning of an antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor using mammalian cell display and massively parallel pyrosequencing. MAbs 5:523–532PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Fowler DM, Fields S (2014) Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science. Nat Methods 11:801–807PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Fowler DM, Araya CL, Fleishman SJ, Kellogg EH, Stephany JJ, Baker D, Fields S (2010) High-resolution mapping of protein sequence-function relationships. Nat Methods 7:741–746PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Fujii S, Matsuura T, Sunami T, Kazuta Y, Yomo T (2013) In vitro evolution of alpha-hemolysin using a liposome display. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:16796–16801PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Fujii S, Matsuura T, Sunami T, Nishikawa T, Kazuta Y, Yomo T (2014) Liposome display for in vitro selection and evolution of membrane proteins. Nat Protoc 9:1578–1591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Fujino Y, Fujita R, Wada K, Fujishige K, Kanamori T, Hunt L, Shimizu Y, Ueda T (2012) Robust in vitro affinity maturation strategy based on interface-focused high-throughput mutational scanning. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 428:395–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Fujiwara D, Kitada H, Oguri M, Nishihara T, Michigami M, Shiraishi K, Yuba E, Nakase I, Im H, Cho S, Joung JY, Kodama S, Kono K, Ham S, Fujii I (2016) A cyclized helix-loop-helix peptide as a molecular scaffold for the design of inhibitors of intracellular protein-protein interactions by epitope and arginine grafting. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:10612–10615Google Scholar
  50. Giger L, Caner S, Obexer R, Kast P, Baker D, Ban N, Hilvert D (2013) Evolution of a designed retro-aldolase leads to complete active site remodeling. Nat Chem Biol 9:494–498PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Gilbreth RN, Koide S (2012) Structural insights for engineering binding proteins based on non-antibody scaffolds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22:413–420PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Go A, Kim S, Baum J, Hecht MH (2008) Structure and dynamics of de novo proteins from a designed superfamily of 4-helix bundles. Protein Sci 17:821–832PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Gonen S, DiMaio F, Gonen T, Baker D (2015) Design of ordered two-dimensional arrays mediated by noncovalent protein-protein interfaces. Science 348:1365–1368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Goto Y, Katoh T, Suga H (2011) Flexizymes for genetic code reprogramming. Nat Protoc 6:779–790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Gradisar H, Bozic S, Doles T, Vengust D, Hafner-Bratkovic I, Mertelj A, Webb B, Sali A, Klavzar S, Jerala R (2013) Design of a single-chain polypeptide tetrahedron assembled from coiled-coil segments. Nat Chem Biol 9:362–366PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Graziano JJ, Liu W, Perera R, Geierstanger BH, Lesley SA, Schultz PG (2008) Selecting folded proteins from a library of secondary structural elements. J Am Chem Soc 130:176–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Grigoryan G, Degrado WF (2011) Probing designability via a generalized model of helical bundle geometry. J Mol Biol 405:1079–1100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Grigoryan G, Kim YH, Acharya R, Axelrod K, Jain RM, Willis L, Drndic M, Kikkawa JM, DeGrado WF (2011) Computational design of virus-like protein assemblies on carbon nanotube surfaces. Science 332:1071–1076PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Gully BS, Shah KR, Lee M, Shearston K, Smith NM, Sadowska A, Blythe AJ, Bernath-Levin K, Stanley WA, Small ID, Bond CS (2015) The design and structural characterization of a synthetic pentatricopeptide repeat protein. Acta Crystallogr D 71:196–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Guthe S, Kapinos L, Moglich A, Meier S, Grzesiek S, Kiefhaber T (2004) Very fast folding and association of a trimerization domain from bacteriophage T4 fibritin. J Mol Biol 337:905–915PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Hanes J, Pluckthun A (1997) In vitro selection and evolution of functional proteins by using ribosome display. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:4937–4942PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Harbury PB, Plecs JJ, Tidor B, Alber T, Kim PS (1998) High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science 282:1462–1467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hecht MH, Das A, Go A, Bradley LH, Wei Y (2004) De novo proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Protein Sci 13:1711–1723PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Hietpas RT, Jensen JD, Bolon DNA (2011) Experimental illumination of a fitness landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:7896–7901PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Hipolito CJ, Suga H (2012) Ribosomal production and in vitro selection of natural product-like peptidomimetics: the FIT and RaPID systems. Curr Opin Chem Biol 16:196–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Hirota S, Hattori Y, Nagao S, Taketa M, Komori H, Kamikubo H, Wang Z, Takahashi I, Negi S, Sugiura Y, Kataoka M, Higuchi Y (2010) Cytochrome c polymerization by successive domain swapping at the C-terminal helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:12854–12859Google Scholar
  67. Hoegler KJ, Hecht MH (2016) A de novo protein confers copper resistance in Escherichia Coli. Protein Sci 25:1249–1259PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Honda S, Yamasaki K, Sawada Y, Morii H (2004) 10 residue folded peptide designed by segment statistics. Structure 12:1507–1518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Honda S, Akiba T, Kato YS, Sawada Y, Sekijima M, Ishimura M, Ooishi A, Watanabe H, Odahara T, Harata K (2008) Crystal structure of a ten-amino acid protein. J Am Chem Soc 130:15327–15331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Hoogenboom HR (2005) Selecting and screening recombinant antibody libraries. Nat Biotechnol 23:1105–1116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Hsia Y, Bale JB, Gonen S, Shi D, Sheffler W, Fong KK, Nattermann U, Xu C, Huang PS, Ravichandran R, Yi S, Davis TN, Gonen T, King NP, Baker D (2016) Design of a hyperstable 60-subunit protein icosahedron. Nature 535:136–139PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Huang PS, Oberdorfer G, Xu C, Pei XY, Nannenga BL, Rogers JM, DiMaio F, Gonen T, Luisi B, Baker D (2014) High thermodynamic stability of parametrically designed helical bundles. Science 346:481–485PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Huang PS, Boyken SE, Baker D (2016) The coming of age of de novo protein design. Nature 537:320–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Jardine JG, Kulp DW, Havenar-Daughton C, Sarkar A, Briney B, Sok D, Sesterhenn F, Ereno-Orbea J, Kalyuzhniy O, Deresa I, Hu X, Spencer S, Jones M, Georgeson E, Adachi Y, Kubitz M, deCamp AC, Julien JP, Wilson IA, Burton DR, Crotty S, Schief WR (2016) HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody precursor B cells revealed by germline-targeting immunogen. Science 351:1458–1463PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Jiang L, Althoff EA, Clemente FR, Doyle L, Rothlisberger D, Zanghellini A, Gallaher JL, Betker JL, Tanaka F, Barbas CF 3rd, Hilvert D, Houk KN, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2008) De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319:1387–1391PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Joh NH, Wang T, Bhate MP, Acharya R, Wu Y, Grabe M, Hong M, Grigoryan G, DeGrado WF (2014) De novo design of a transmembrane Zn2+-transporting four-helix bundle. Science 346:1520–1524PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Jost C, Pluckthun A (2014) Engineered proteins with desired specificity: DARPins, other alternative scaffolds and bispecific IgGs. Curr Opin Struct Biol 27:102–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Jumawid MT, Takahashi T, Yamazaki T, Ashigai H, Mihara H (2009) Selection and structural analysis of de novo proteins from an α3β3 genetic library. Protein Sci 18:384–398Google Scholar
  79. Kamtekar S, Schiffer JM, Xiong H, Babik JM, Hecht MH (1993) Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Science 262:1680–1685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Kaufmann KW, Lemmon GH, Deluca SL, Sheehan JH, Meiler J (2010) Practically useful: what the Rosetta protein modeling suite can do for you. Biochemistry 49:2987–2998PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Ke Y (2014) Designer three-dimensional DNA architectures. Curr Opin Struct Biol 27:122–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Keefe AD, Szostak JW (2001) Functional proteins from a random-sequence library. Nature 410:715–718PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Kim KH, Ko DK, Kim YT, Kim NH, Paul J, Zhang SQ, Murray CB, Acharya R, DeGrado WF, Kim YH, Grigoryan G (2016) Protein-directed self-assembly of a fullerene crystal. Nat Commun 7:11429PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. King NP, Sheffler W, Sawaya MR, Vollmar BS, Sumida JP, Andre I, Gonen T, Yeates TO, Baker D (2012) Computational design of self-assembling protein nanomaterials with atomic level accuracy. Science 336:1171–1174PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. King NP, Bale JB, Sheffler W, McNamara DE, Gonen S, Gonen T, Yeates TO, Baker D (2014) Accurate design of co-assembling multi-component protein nanomaterials. Nature 510:103–108PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Kiss G, Celebi-Olcum N, Moretti R, Baker D, Houk KN (2013) Computational enzyme design. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:5700–5725Google Scholar
  87. Kobayashi N, Arai R (2017) Design and construction of self-assembling supramolecular protein complexes using artificial and fusion proteins as nanoscale building blocks. Curr Opin Biotech 46:57–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Kobayashi N, Yanase K, Sato T, Unzai S, Hecht MH, Arai R (2015) Self-assembling Nano-architectures created from a protein Nano-building block using an Intermolecularly folded Dimeric de novo protein. J Am Chem Soc 137:11285–11293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Koenig P, Lee CV, Sanowar S, Wu P, Stinson J, Harris SF, Fuh G (2015) Deep sequencing-guided Design of a High Affinity Dual Specificity Antibody to target two Angiogenic factors in Neovascular age-related macular degeneration. J Biol Chem 290:21773–21786PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Koga N, Tatsumi-Koga R, Liu G, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Baker D (2012) Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 491:222–227PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Kries H, Blomberg R, Hilvert D (2013) De novo enzymes by computational design. Curr Opin Chem Biol 17:221–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2003) Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302:1364–1368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Lai YT, Cascio D, Yeates TO (2012) Structure of a 16-nm cage designed by using protein oligomers. Science 336:1129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Lai YT, Reading E, Hura GL, Tsai KL, Laganowsky A, Asturias FJ, Tainer JA, Robinson CV, Yeates TO (2014) Structure of a designed protein cage that self-assembles into a highly porous cube. Nat Chem 6:1065–1071PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM, Lange OF, Thompson J, Jacak R, Kaufman K, Renfrew PD, Smith CA, Sheffler W, Davis IW, Cooper S, Treuille A, Mandell DJ, Richter F, Ban YE, Fleishman SJ, Corn JE, Kim DE, Lyskov S, Berrondo M, Mentzer S, Popovic Z, Havranek JJ, Karanicolas J, Das R, Meiler J, Kortemme T, Gray JJ, Kuhlman B, Baker D, Bradley P (2011) ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487:545–574PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Lee SC, Park K, Han J, Lee JJ, Kim HJ, Hong S, Heu W, Kim YJ, Ha JS, Lee SG, Cheong HK, Jeon YH, Kim D, Kim HS (2012) Design of a binding scaffold based on variable lymphocyte receptors of jawless vertebrates by module engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:3299–3304PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Leiman PG, Kanamaru S, Mesyanzhinov VV, Arisaka F, Rossmann MG (2003) Structure and morphogenesis of bacteriophage T4. Cell Mol Life Sci 60:2356–2370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Lin YR, Koga N, Tatsumi-Koga R, Liu G, Clouser AF, Montelione GT, Baker D (2015a) Control over overall shape and size in de novo designed proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E5478–E5485PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Lin YW, Nagao S, Zhang M, Shomura Y, Higuchi Y, Hirota S (2015b) Rational design of heterodimeric protein using domain swapping for myoglobin. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:511–515Google Scholar
  100. Ljubetic A, Lapenta F, Gradisar H, Drobnak I, Aupic J, Strmsek Z, Lainscek D, Hafner-Bratkovic I, Majerle A, Krivec N, Bencina M, Pisanski T, Velickovic TC, Round A, Carazo JM, Melero R, Jerala R (2017) Design of coiled-coil protein-origami cages that self-assemble in vitro and in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 35:1094–1101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Lupas AN, Bassler J (2017) Coiled coils - a model system for the 21st century. Trends Biochem Sci 42:130–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Marcos E, Basanta B, Chidyausiku TM, Tang Y, Oberdorfer G, Liu G, Swapna GV, Guan R, Silva DA, Dou J, Pereira JH, Xiao R, Sankaran B, Zwart PH, Montelione GT, Baker D (2017) Principles for designing proteins with cavities formed by curved beta sheets. Science 355:201–206PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Matsuura T, Ernst A, Zechel DL, Pluckthun A (2004) Combinatorial approaches to novel proteins. Chembiochem 5:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. McCafferty J, Griffiths AD, Winter G, Chiswell DJ (1990) Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains. Nature 348:552–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Miyamoto T, Kuribayashi M, Nagao S, Shomura Y, Higuchi Y, Hirota S (2015) Domain-swapped cytochrome cb(562) dimer and its nanocage encapsulating a Zn-SO4 cluster in the internal cavity. Chem Sci 6:7336–7342PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. Miyazaki N, Kiyose N, Akazawa Y, Takashima M, Hagihara Y, Inoue N, Matsuda T, Ogawa R, Inoue S, Ito Y (2015) Isolation and characterization of antigen-specific alpaca (Lama Pacos) VHH antibodies by biopanning followed by high-throughput sequencing. J Biochem 158:205–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Morimoto J, Hayashi Y, Iwasaki K, Suga H (2011) Flexizymes: their evolutionary history and the origin of catalytic function. Acc Chem Res 44:1359–1368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Mou Y, Huang PS, Hsu FC, Huang SJ, Mayo SL (2015a) Computational design and experimental verification of a symmetric protein homodimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:10714–10719PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. Mou Y, Yu JY, Wannier TM, Guo CL, Mayo SL (2015b) Computational design of co-assembling protein-DNA nanowires. Nature 525:230–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Murakami H, Ohta A, Ashigai H, Suga H (2006) A highly flexible tRNA acylation method for non-natural polypeptide synthesis. Nat Methods 3:357–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Nemoto N, Miyamoto-Sato E, Husimi Y, Yanagawa H (1997) In vitro virus: bonding of mRNA bearing puromycin at the 3′-terminal end to the C-terminal end of its encoded protein on the ribosome in vitro. FEBS Lett 414:405–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Nemoto N, Fukushima T, Kumachi S, Suzuki M, Nishigaki K, Kubo T (2014) Versatile C-terminal specific biotinylation of proteins using both a puromycin-linker and a cell-free translation system for studying high-throughput protein-molecule interactions. Anal Chem 86:8535–8540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Niitsu A, Heal JW, Fauland K, Thomson AR, Woolfson DN (2017) Membrane-spanning α-helical barrels as tractable protein-design targets. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160213Google Scholar
  114. Ogihara NL, Ghirlanda G, Bryson JW, Gingery M, DeGrado WF, Eisenberg D (2001) Design of three-dimensional domain-swapped dimers and fibrous oligomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:1404–1409Google Scholar
  115. Packer MS, Liu DR (2015) Methods for the directed evolution of proteins. Nat Rev Genet 16:379–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Padilla JE, Colovos C, Yeates TO (2001) Nanohedra: using symmetry to design self assembling protein cages, layers, crystals, and filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:2217–2221PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Park K, Shen BW, Parmeggiani F, Huang PS, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2015) Control of repeat-protein curvature by computational protein design. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22:167–174PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. Parmeggiani F, Huang PS (2017) Designing repeat proteins: a modular approach to protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 45:116–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Passioura T, Suga H (2017) A RaPID way to discover nonstandard macrocyclic peptide modulators of drug targets. Chem Commun 53:1931–1940Google Scholar
  120. Patel SC, Hecht MH (2012) Directed evolution of the peroxidase activity of a de novo-designed protein. Protein Eng Des Sel 25:445–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Patel SC, Bradley LH, Jinadasa SP, Hecht MH (2009) Cofactor binding and enzymatic activity in an unevolved superfamily of de novo designed 4-helix bundle proteins. Protein Sci 18:1388–1400PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. Pieters BJ, van Eldijk MB, Nolte RJ, Mecinovic J (2016) Natural supramolecular protein assemblies. Chem Soc Rev 45:24–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Reichen C, Hansen S, Pluckthun A (2014) Modular peptide binding: from a comparison of natural binders to designed armadillo repeat proteins. J Struct Biol 185:147–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Reichen C, Hansen S, Forzani C, Honegger A, Fleishman SJ, Zhou T, Parmeggiani F, Ernst P, Madhurantakam C, Ewald C, Mittl PR, Zerbe O, Baker D, Caflisch A, Pluckthun A (2016) Computationally designed armadillo repeat proteins for modular peptide recognition. J Mol Biol 428:4467–4489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Richter F, Leaver-Fay A, Khare SD, Bjelic S, Baker D (2011) De novo enzyme design using Rosetta3. PLoS ONE 6:e19230PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. Riechmann L, Winter G (2000) Novel folded protein domains generated by combinatorial shuffling of polypeptide segments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:10068–10073PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. Roberts RW, Szostak JW (1997) RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:12297–12302PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. Rocklin GJ, Chidyausiku TM, Goreshnik I, Ford A, Houliston S, Lemak A, Carter L, Ravichandran R, Mulligan VK, Chevalier A, Arrowsmith CH, Baker D (2017) Global analysis of protein folding using massively parallel design, synthesis, and testing. Science 357:168–175PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  129. Rothlisberger D, Khersonsky O, Wollacott AM, Jiang L, DeChancie J, Betker J, Gallaher JL, Althoff EA, Zanghellini A, Dym O, Albeck S, Houk KN, Tawfik DS, Baker D (2008) Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453:190–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Salgado EN, Ambroggio XI, Brodin JD, Lewis RA, Kuhlman B, Tezcan FA (2010a) Metal templated design of protein interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:1827–1832PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Salgado EN, Radford RJ, Tezcan FA (2010b) Metal-directed protein self-assembly. Acc Chem Res 43:661–672PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  132. Sciore A, Su M, Koldewey P, Eschweiler JD, Diffley KA, Linhares BM, Ruotolo BT, Bardwell JC, Skiniotis G, Marsh EN (2016) Flexible, symmetry-directed approach to assembling protein cages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:8681–8686PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. Siegel JB, Zanghellini A, Lovick HM, Kiss G, Lambert AR, St Clair JL, Gallaher JL, Hilvert D, Gelb MH, Stoddard BL, Houk KN, Michael FE, Baker D (2010) Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction. Science 329:309–313PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. Smith BA, Hecht MH (2011) Novel proteins: from fold to function. Curr Opin Chem Biol 15:421–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Smith BA, Mularz AE, Hecht MH (2015) Divergent evolution of a bifunctional de novo protein. Protein Sci 24:246–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Song WJ, Tezcan FA (2014) A designed supramolecular protein assembly with in vivo enzymatic activity. Science 346:1525–1528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Sontz PA, Bailey JB, Ahn S, Tezcan FA (2015) A metal organic framework with spherical protein nodes: rational chemical design of 3D protein crystals. J Am Chem Soc 137:11598–11601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Stapleton JA, Swartz JR (2010) Development of an in vitro compartmentalization screen for high-throughput directed evolution of [FeFe] hydrogenases. PLoS ONE 5:e15275PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  139. Strauch EM, Bernard SM, La D, Bohn AJ, Lee PS, Anderson CE, Nieusma T, Holstein CA, Garcia NK, Hooper KA, Ravichandran R, Nelson JW, Sheffler W, Bloom JD, Lee KK, Ward AB, Yager P, Fuller DH, Wilson IA, Baker D (2017) Computational design of trimeric influenza-neutralizing proteins targeting the hemagglutinin receptor binding site. Nat Biotechnol 35:667–671PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  140. Suzuki Y, Cardone G, Restrepo D, Zavattieri PD, Baker TS, Tezcan FA (2016) Self-assembly of coherently dynamic, auxetic, two-dimensional protein crystals. Nature 533:369–373PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. Thomas F, Burgess NC, Thomson AR, Woolfson DN (2016) Controlling the assembly of coiled-coil peptide Nanotubes. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:987–991Google Scholar
  142. Thomson AR, Wood CW, Burton AJ, Bartlett GJ, Sessions RB, Brady RL, Woolfson DN (2014) Computational design of water-soluble alpha-helical barrels. Science 346:485–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Tinberg CE, Khare SD, Dou J, Doyle L, Nelson JW, Schena A, Jankowski W, Kalodimos CG, Johnsson K, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2013) Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity. Nature 501:212–216PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. Ueno S, Kimura S, Ichiki T, Nemoto N (2012) Improvement of a puromycin-linker to extend the selection target varieties in cDNA display method. J Biotechnol 162:299–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Urvoas A, Guellouz A, Valerio-Lepiniec M, Graille M, Durand D, Desravines DC, van Tilbeurgh H, Desmadril M, Minard P (2010) Design, production and molecular structure of a new family of artificial alpha-helicoidal repeat proteins (αRep) based on thermostable HEAT-like repeats. J Mol Biol 404:307–327Google Scholar
  146. Urvoas A, Valerio-Lepiniec M, Minard P (2012) Artificial proteins from combinatorial approaches. Trends Biotechnol 30:512–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Uyeda A, Nakayama S, Kato Y, Watanabe H, Matsuura T (2016) Construction of an in vitro gene screening system of the E. Coli EmrE transporter using liposome display. Anal Chem 88:12028–12035Google Scholar
  148. Varadamsetty G, Tremmel D, Hansen S, Parmeggiani F, Pluckthun A (2012) Designed armadillo repeat proteins: library generation, characterization and selection of peptide binders with high specificity. J Mol Biol 424:68–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Voet AR, Noguchi H, Addy C, Simoncini D, Terada D, Unzai S, Park SY, Zhang KY, Tame JR (2014) Computational design of a self-assembling symmetrical beta-propeller protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:15102–15107PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. Voet AR, Noguchi H, Addy C, Zhang KY, Tame JR (2015) Biomineralization of a cadmium chloride Nanocrystal by a designed symmetrical protein. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:9857–9860Google Scholar
  151. Votteler J, Ogohara C, Yi S, Hsia Y, Nattermann U, Belnap DM, King NP, Sundquist WI (2016) Designed proteins induce the formation of nanocage-containing extracellular vesicles. Nature 540:292–295PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  152. Watanabe H, Honda S (2015) Adaptive assembly: maximizing the potential of a given functional peptide with a tailor-made protein scaffold. Chem Biol 22:1165–1173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Watanabe H, Yamasaki K, Honda S (2014) Tracing primordial protein evolution through structurally guided stepwise segment elongation. J Biol Chem 289:3394–3404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Wei Y, Kim S, Fela D, Baum J, Hecht MH (2003) Solution structure of a de novo protein from a designed combinatorial library. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:13270–13273PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. West MW, Wang W, Patterson J, Mancias JD, Beasley JR, Hecht MH (1999) De novo amyloid proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:11211–11216PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. Whitehead TA, Chevalier A, Song Y, Dreyfus C, Fleishman SJ, De Mattos C, Myers CA, Kamisetty H, Blair P, Wilson IA, Baker D (2012) Optimization of affinity, specificity and function of designed influenza inhibitors using deep sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 30:543–548PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. Wilson DS, Keefe AD, Szostak JW (2001) The use of mRNA display to select high-affinity protein-binding peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:3750–3755PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  158. Wood CW, Woolfson DN (2017) CCBuilder 2.0: powerful and accessible coiled-coil modeling. Protein Sci (in press) doi:10.1002/pro.3279Google Scholar
  159. Wood CW, Bruning M, Ibarra AA, Bartlett GJ, Thomson AR, Sessions RB, Brady RL, Woolfson DN (2014) CCBuilder: an interactive web-based tool for building, designing and assessing coiled-coil protein assemblies. Bioinformatics 30:3029–3035PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. Woolfson DN, Bartlett GJ, Bruning M, Thomson AR (2012) New currency for old rope: from coiled-coil assemblies to α-helical barrels. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22:432–441Google Scholar
  161. Woolfson DN, Bartlett GJ, Burton AJ, Heal JW, Niitsu A, Thomson AR, Wood CW (2015) De novo protein design: how do we expand into the universe of possible protein structures? Curr Opin Struct Biol 33:16–26Google Scholar
  162. Wrenbeck EE, Faber MS, Whitehead TA (2017) Deep sequencing methods for protein engineering and design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 45:36–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Yagi S, Akanuma S, Yamagishi M, Uchida T, Yamagishi A (2016) De novo design of protein–protein interactions through modification of inter-molecular helix–helix interface residues. Biochim Biophys Acta 1864:479–487Google Scholar
  164. Yagi S, Akanuma S, Yamagishi A (2017) Creation of artificial protein–protein interactions using α-helices as interface. Biophys Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-017-0352-9
  165. Yamagishi Y, Shoji I, Miyagawa S, Kawakami T, Katoh T, Goto Y, Suga H (2011) Natural product-like macrocyclic N-methyl-peptide inhibitors against a ubiquitin ligase uncovered from a ribosome-expressed de novo library. Chem Biol 18:1562–1570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Yamaguchi J, Naimuddin M, Biyani M, Sasaki T, Machida M, Kubo T, Funatsu T, Husimi Y, Nemoto N (2009) cDNA display: a novel screening method for functional disulfide-rich peptides by solid-phase synthesis and stabilization of mRNA-protein fusions. Nucleic Acids Res 37:e108PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  167. Yeates TO, Liu Y, Laniado J (2016) The design of symmetric protein nanomaterials comes of age in theory and practice. Curr Opin Struct Biol 39:134–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Yoshimoto N, Tatematsu K, Iijima M, Niimi T, Maturana AD, Fujii I, Kondo A, Tanizawa K, Kuroda S (2014) High-throughput de novo screening of receptor agonists with an automated single-cell analysis and isolation system. Sci Rep 4:4242PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  169. Zanghellini A (2014) de novo computational enzyme design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 29:132–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Zhu B, Mizoguchi T, Kojima T, Nakano H (2015) Ultra-high-throughput screening of an in vitro-synthesized horseradish peroxidase displayed on microbeads using cell sorter. PLoS ONE 10:e0127479PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for Pure and Applied Biophysics (IUPAB) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Biology, Faculty of Textile Science and TechnologyShinshu UniversityUedaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Supramolecular Complexes, Research Center for Fungal and Microbial DynamismShinshu UniversityMinamiminowaJapan
  3. 3.Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Interdisciplinary Cluster for Cutting Edge ResearchShinshu UniversityMatsumotoJapan
  4. 4.Division of Structural and Synthetic BiologyRIKEN Center for Life Science TechnologiesYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations