Non fitting based FRET–FLIM analysis approaches applied to quantify protein–protein interactions in live cells
- 304 Downloads
New imaging methodologies in quantitative fluorescence microscopy and nanoscopy have been developed in the last few years and are beginning to be extensively applied to biological problems, such as the localization and quantification of protein interactions. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) detected by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) is currently employed not only in biophysics or chemistry but also in bio-medicine, thanks to new advancements in technology and also new developments in data treatment. FRET–FLIM can be a very useful tool to ascertain protein interactions occurring in single living cells. In this review, we stress the importance of increasing the acquisition speed when working in vivo employing Time-Domain FLIM. The development of the new mathematical-based non-fitting methods allows the determining of the fraction of interacting donor without the requirement of high count statistics, and thus allows the performing of high speed acquisitions in FRET–FLIM to still be quantitative.
KeywordsQuantitative fluorescence microscopy Nanoscopy Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)
This work was supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, the Région Ile de France (Soutien aux Equipes Scientifiques pour l’Acquisition de Moyens Expérimentaux), the Association Nationale pour le Recherche (ANR-PFTV) (to M, C,-M,), IBiSA (to M, C,-M, and M,T,), Rennes Métropole and Région Bretagne (to M,T,).
- Becker W, Bergmann A (2004) Multi-dimensional time-correlated single photon counting. In: Gedes CD, Lackowicz JR (eds) Review in fluorescence 2005. . Springer. New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Elson D, Requejo-Isidro J, Munro I, Reavell F, Siegel J, Suhling K, Tadrous P, Benninger R, Lanigan P, McGinty J, Talbot C, Treanor B, Webb S, Sandison A, Wallace A, Davis D, Lever J, Neil M, Phillips D, Stamp G, French P (2004) Time-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging applied to biological tissue. Photochem Photobiol Sci 3:795–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haj FG, Verveer PJ, Squire A, Neel BG, Bastiaens PIH (2002) Imaging sites of receptor dephosphorylation by PTP1B on the surface of the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 1708–1711Google Scholar
- Laptenok SP, Borst JW, Mullen KM, van Stokkum IH, Visser AJ, van Amerongen H (2010) Global analysis of Förster resonance energy transfer in live cells measured by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy exploiting the rise time of acceptor fluorescence. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:7593–75602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leray A, Spriet C, Trinel D, Héliot L (2009) Three-dimensional polar representation for multispectral fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Cytom A 75:10749–11014Google Scholar
- Nikolaev VO, Moshkov A, Lyon AR, Miragoli M, Novak P, Paur H, Lohse MJ, Korchev YE, Harding SE, Gorelik J (2010) β2-adrenergic receptor redistribution in heart failure changes cAMP compartmentation. Science 1653–1657Google Scholar
- Padilla-Parra S, Audugé N, Tramier M, Coppey-Moisan M (2010) Hetero-FRET imaging by time domain FLIM: a quantitative method to follow transient protein-protein interactions in living cells. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sytsma J, Vroom JM, De Grauw CJ, Gerritsen HC (1998) Time-gated fluorescence lifetime imaging scanning microscopes: acquisition speed, photon economy and lifetime resolution. J Microsc 206:218–224Google Scholar