Mycotoxin Research

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 103–111

Production of anti-idiotype antibodies for deoxynivalenol and their evaluation with three immunoassay platforms

Original Paper

Abstract

Immunoassays for deoxynivalenol (DON) that involve binding to DON-specific antibodies have been widely developed. In such assays, the responses of samples are generally compared with calibration curves generated by using DON in competition with labeled reagents such as enzymatic or fluorescent conjugates of the toxin. However, materials that mimic the toxin can also be used, provided that they compete effectively with the labeled reagents for the DON-specific antibodies. Examples include certain types of anti-idiotype antibodies, obtained by the immunization of animals with toxin-specific antibodies. In the present work, anti-idiotype antibodies were developed which mimicked DON in the ability to bind to a DON-specific monoclonal antibody (Mab). Fab fragments of the Mab (Ab1) were used to immunize rabbits. Sera were screened by competitive direct enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (CD-ELISA) for the presence of anti-idiotype antibodies (Ab2). In order to determine the most effective screening format and also the potential efficacy in various forms of biosensors, the sera were further evaluated in biolayer interferometry (BLI) and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) formats. All three formats were used to demonstrate the presence of anti-idiotypes capable of binding to the paratope of the DON antibody (subtypes Ab2β or Ab2γ). Such materials have the potential to replace DON as calibrants in immunoassays for this toxin.

Keywords

Deoxynivalenol Antibody Immunoassay Biosensor Fluorescence polarization 

References

  1. Bona CA, Kohler H (1984) Anti-idiotypic antibodies and internal images. In: Venter JC, Fraser CM, Lindstrom J (eds) Monoclonal and anti-idiotypic antibodies: probes for receptor structure and function. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 141–149Google Scholar
  2. Chanh TC, Huot RI, Schick MR, Hewetson JF (1989) Anti-idiotypic antibodies against a monoclonal antibody specific for the trichothecene mycotoxin T-2. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 100:201–207. doi:10.1016/0041-008X(89)90306-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chanh TC, Siwak EB, Hewetson JF (1991) Anti-idiotype-based vaccines against biological toxins. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 108:183–193. doi:10.1016/0041-008X(91)90109-R PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chanh TC, Kennedy RC, Hewetson JF (1992) Anti-idiotype vaccines in toxicology. Intl J Clin Lab Res 22:28–35. doi:10.1007/BF02591390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chu FS, Huang X, Maragos CM (1995) Production and characterization of anti-idiotype and anti-anti-idiotype antibodies against fumonisin B1. J Agric Food Chem 43:261–267. doi:10.1021/jf00049a046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guan D, Li P, Zhang Q, Zhang W, Cui Y (2011) A competitive immunoassay with a surrogate calibrator curve for aflatoxin M1 in milk. Analytica Chim Acta 703:64–69. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.07.011 Google Scholar
  7. He J, Fan MT, Liang Y, Liu XJ (2010) Application of anti-idiotype antibody in small molecules immunoassay. Chinese J Anal Chem 38:1366–1370. doi:10.1016/S1872-2040(09)60068-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hsu KH, Chu FS (1994) Production and characterization of anti-idiotype and anti-anti-idiotype antibodies from a monoclonal antibody against aflatoxin. J Agric Food Chem 42:2353–2359. doi:10.1021/jf00046a052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jerne NK (1974) Towards a network theory of the immune system Ann. Immunol (Inst Pasteur) 125C:373–389Google Scholar
  10. Krska R, Welzig E, Boudra H (2007) Analysis of Fusarium toxins in feed. Anim Feed Sci Technol 137:241–264. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krska R, Schubert-Ullrich P, Molinelli A, Sulyok M, MacDonald S, Crews C (2008) Mycotoxin analysis: an update. Food Addit Contam 25:152–163. doi:10.1080/02652030701765723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lippolis V, Pascale M, Visconti A (2006) Optimization of a fluorescence polarization immunoassay for rapid quantification of deoxynivalenol in Durum wheat-based products. J Food Prot 69:2712–2719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu R, He Q, Xu Y, Yu Z (2007) An immunoassay for ochratoxin A without the mycotoxin. Food Control 18:872–877. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maragos CM (2012) Signal amplification using colloidal gold in a biolayer interferometry-based immunosensor for the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol. Food Addit Contam A 29:1108–1117. doi:10.1080/19440049.2012.671789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maragos CM, Busman M (2010) Rapid and advanced tools for mycotoxin analysis: a review. Food Addit Contam A 27:1–13. doi:10.1080/19440040903515934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maragos CM, McCormick SP (2000) Monoclonal antibodies for the mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and 3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol. Food Agric Immunol 12:181–192. doi:10.1080/09540100050140722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maragos CM, Plattner RD (2002) Rapid fluorescence polarization immunoassay for the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol in wheat. J Agric Food Chem 50:1827–1832. doi:10.1021/jf011487d PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maragos CM, Li L, Chen D (2012) Production andcharacterization of a single chain variable fragment (scFv) against the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol.Food Agric Immunol 23:51-67Google Scholar
  19. Pascale M, Lippolis V, Maragos CM, Visconti A (2008) Recent developments in trichothecene analysis. In: Siantar DP, Trucksess MW, Scott PM, Herman EM (eds) Food Contaminants: ACS Symposium Series 1001. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp 192–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pestka J (2010) Toxicological mechanisms and potential health effects of deoxynivalenol and nivalenol. World Mycotoxin J 3:323–347. doi:10.3920/WMJ2010.1247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rich RL, Myszka DG (2007) Higher-throughput, label-free, real-time molecular interaction analysis. Anal Biochem 361:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2006.10.040 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Turner PC (2010) Deoxynivalenol and nivalenol occurrence and exposure assessment. World Mycotoxin J 3:315–321. doi:10.3920/WMJ2010.1242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shephard GS, Berthiller F, Dorner J, Krska R, Lombaert GA, Malone B et al (2010).Developments in mycotoxin analysis: an update for 2008–2009. World Mycotoxin J3:3–23Google Scholar
  24. Turner NW, Subrahmanyam S, Piletsky SA (2009) Analytical methods for determination of mycotoxins: a review. Analytica Chim Acta 632:168–180. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2008.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Uner A, Gavalchin J (2006) Idiotypes. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 1-5. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0000912
  26. Yu FY, Chu FS (1999) Production and characterization of a monoclonal anti-anti-idiotype antibody against fumonisin B1. J Agric Food Chem 47:4815–4820. doi:10.1021/jf990185x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yuan Q, Hart PL, Hespenheide BM, Kuhn LA, Pestka JJ, Linz JE (1999) Identification of mimotope peptides which bind to the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol-specific monoclonal antibody. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3279–3286PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mycotoxin Research and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens & Mycology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization ResearchPeoriaUSA

Personalised recommendations