Exposure of neonates to ochratoxin A: first biomonitoring results in human milk (colostrum) from Chile
- 196 Downloads
The mycotoxin ochratoxin A (OTA) and its metabolite ochratoxin alpha (OTα) were determined in milk and blood from nine lactating women who provided samples soon after delivery at a hospital in southern Chile. The analytical method applied liquid–liquid extraction with chloroform, and in the case of blood, an extra purification with solid phase extraction prior to HPLC analysis with fluorescence detection. OTA was detected in all human milk samples, with an average concentration of 106 ± 45 ng/L (range 44–184 ng/L). Levels of OTα were 40 ± 30 ng/L (LOQ 40 ng/L), but increased considerably upon enzymatic hydrolysis with ß-glucuronidase/sulfatase (up to 840 ± 256 ng/L) in human milk. By contrast, there was no evidence for conjugates of OTA. The data on OTA in breast milk and levels reported in blood from women in Chile are indicative of an efficient lactational transfer of the mycotoxin. Infant exposure to OTA was estimated by considering their daily OTA intake with human milk at early stages of nursing. For the majority of milk samples, the calculated OTA intake of infants exceeded the tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 5 ng/kg body weight (bw)/day proposed by the Nordic Expert Group, and infant exposure approached the provisional tolerable doses of 14–16 ng/kg bw/day suggested by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JEFCA) and by EFSA for adults. The present study documents and confirms the presence of OTA in human milk at levels where the TDI can be exceeded. These results point out the need to continue food and biological monitoring and to develop strategies, e.g. dietary recommendations to pregnant and lactating women, aimed to reduce OTA exposure in early periods of life.
KeywordsBiomonitoring Human milk HPLC analysis Ochratoxin A Tolerable daily intake
The authors want to thank the midwives Verónica Moreno V. and Barbara Rubilar R. from the Higueras Hospital in Talcahuano, Chile, and Cecilia Urrutia for their help by collecting samples, and Iris Glaeser, Michael Porta and Gabi Baumhoer (IfADo) for their technical help. Finally, we want to thank DAAD and CONICYT for their support by a stipend to K.M.
- EC (European Commission) (2002a) Commission Regulation No 472/2002 of 12 March 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 466/2001 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs, L 75:18–20Google Scholar
- EC (European Commission) (2002b) Assessment of dietary intake of ochratoxin A by the population of EU Member States. Report of the Scientific Cooperation, Task 3.2.7. Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission. Available at URL: europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/scoop/3.2.7_en.pdf.
- EC (European Commission) (2005) Commission Regulation No 126/2005 of 26 January 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 466/2001 as regarding ochratoxin A, L 25:3–5Google Scholar
- EFSA (2006) European Food Safety Authority; opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the commission related to ochratoxin A in food. The EFSA Journal 365:1–56Google Scholar
- Galvano F, Pietri A, Bertuzzi T, Gagliardi L, Ciotti S, Luisi S, Bognanno M, La Fauci L, Iacopino AM, Nigro F, Li Volti G, Vanella L, Giammanco G, Tina GL, Gazzolo D (2008) Maternal dietary habits and mycotoxin occurrence in human mature milk. Mol Nutr Food Res 52(4):496–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- IARC (1993) Ochratoxin A. Some naturally occurring substances: food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans, Lyon Vol. 56, pp. 489–521Google Scholar
- JECFA (1996) Forty-fourth meeting of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives. Toxicological evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants in food: ochratoxin A. WHO Food Addit Ser 35:363–376Google Scholar
- JECFA (2001) Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, Ochratoxin A, safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food; WHO Food Additives Series 47; FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 74; WHO, p. 281–387. http://www.inchem.org/pages/jecfa.html
- Krogh P, Hald B, Pedersen EJ (1973) Occurrence of ochratoxin and citrinin in cereals associated with mycotoxin porcine nephropathy. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B 81:689–695Google Scholar
- Muñoz K, Vega M, Opazo A (2007) Ochratoxin A in pork meat at the Chilean retail market. 29th Mycotoxin Workshop May 14–16, 2007, Fellbach, Abstract Book, page 103 (P-47)Google Scholar
- Muñoz K, Blaszkewicz M, Degen HG (2009) Simultaneous analysis of ochratoxin A and its major metabolite ochratoxin alpha in plasma and urine for an advanced biomonitoring of the mycotoxin. J Chromatogr B, Biological Monitoring and Analytical Toxicology in Occupational and Environmental Medicine. (in press)Google Scholar
- NNT, The Nordic Working Group on Food Toxicology and Risk Evaluation (1991) Health evaluation of ochratoxin A in food products. Nordiske Seminar og Arbejdsrapporter 545. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- SCF (1998) Scientific Committee on Food Opinion on Ochratoxin A, CS/CNTM/MYC/14 final, Annex II to Document XXIV/2210/98, European Commission, Bruxelles, 17th September 1998. (cited in Galvano et al. 2008)Google Scholar
- Solomon GM, Weiss PM (2002) Chemical contaminants in breast milk: time trends and regional variability. Environ Health Perspect 100(6):339–347Google Scholar
- WHO/UNICEF (1990) Innocenti declaration on the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding, adopted Florence, Italy, 1 August 1990Google Scholar
- Zimmerli B, Dick R (1995) Determination of ochratoxin A at the ppt level in human blood, serum, milk and some foodstuffs by high-performance liquid chromatography with enhanced fluorescence detection and immunoaffinity column cleanup: methodology and Swiss data. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 666(1):85–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zohair A, Salem AB (2006) A study of human exposure to ochratoxin A in a selected population of Egypt. American-Eurasian J Agric & Environ Sci 1(1):19–25Google Scholar