Advertisement

Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 305–320 | Cite as

Ericek, a new Pliocene vertebrate locality in the Çameli Basin (southwestern Anatolia, Turkey)

  • Lars W. van den Hoek OstendeEmail author
  • James D. Gardner
  • Lysanne van Bennekom
  • M. Cihat Alçiçek
  • Alison Murray
  • Frank P. Wesselingh
  • Hülya Alçiçek
  • Alexey Tesakov
Original Paper

Abstract

The Çameli Basin in southwestern Anatolia preserves a sequence of fossiliferous sediments that record the Pliocene and early Pleistocene faunal development in the area. Here, we present the fauna of Ericek, a locality near the bottom of the sequence. The locality is rich in fish remains, particularly pharyngeal teeth of the cyprinids Barbus, Carassius and Capoeta, but also includes rare tooth-bearing bones of a possible cobitid and gobiid. The abundant fish remains agree with the geological interpretation that the Ericek sediments were deposited in a palaeolake. That interpretation is further supported by the abundance of mollusc fossils. The gastropod fauna is dominated by Pseudamnicola, Valvata and other freshwater prosobranch taxa. The dominance of prosobranch taxa over freshwater pulmonate species indicates a well-oxygenated lake environment. A range of aquatic, swamp and terrestrial tetrapod taxa are also represented. The amphibian fauna, documented mainly by anuran skull and postcranial bones and by a single salamander jaw, is consistent with a lacustrine setting for Ericek. Notable among the amphibian fossils are two jaws that may document the second record of palaeobatrachid frogs from Anatolia. Reptiles are represented by a few, incomplete vertebrae of colubroid and indeterminate snakes. Micromammal molars suggest the presence of a forested environment surrounding the palaeolake. Muridae are represented by three species, of which Apodemus cf. dominans is the most abundant. The shrew Asoriculus is the second most abundant species, which argues for a humid palaeoenvironment. The co-occurrences of the vole Mimomys occitanus and of the murids Orientalomys cf. similis and Rhagapodemus cf. primaevus indicate a late MN 15 age for the fauna, at an estimated age of 3.4 Ma.

Keywords

Turkey Mimomys Palaeobiogeography Palaeobatrachidae Palaeolake Palaeoenvironment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We dedicate this paper to Albert J. van den Meulen, in recognition of his contribution to our knowledge of the Plio-Pleistocene faunas of the eastern Mediterranean. Albert’s thesis stands as the starting point for the modern studies on arvicolid palaeontology, and as such he was a major inspiration and help in the career of Alexey Tesakov. Lysanne van Bennekom is grateful for the help provided by Wilma Wessels in studying the fossil murid collections at Utrecht University and for the discussions and help in identification by Hans de Bruijn. James Gardner thanks Jean-Claude Rage (Paris) for assistance with identifying the snake specimens and August Ilg (Düsseldorf) for running a search in the fosFARbase database for records of Pliocene amphibian and reptiles in Turkey. M. Cihat Alçiçek benefited from both a Temminck fellowship and a SYNTHESYS grant for consecutive visits to Naturalis. Alexey Tesakov and Hülya Alçiçek received Temminck and Martin fellowships, respectively, for their visits to the same institute. M. Cihat Alçiçek, Alexey Tesakov and Hülya Alçiçek benefited from the bilateral project of TUBITAK-RFBR (111Y192) and MCA granted by TUBA-GEBIP (Outstanding Young Scientist Award by the Turkish Academy of Sciences). We are grateful for the comments of Leon Claessens and an anonymous reviewer, which helped to improve our paper. Delia van Oijen (Naturalis) assisted with the electron microscope photographs and in making the figures. This is a contribution to NECLIME.

References

  1. Alçiçek, M. C. (2001). Sedimentological investigation of the Çameli Basin (late Miocene – late Pliocene, Denizli, SW Anatolia). Ph.D. Dissertation, 101 p., Ankara University, Turkey.Google Scholar
  2. Alçiçek, M. C., Kazancı, N., & Özkul, M. (2005). Multiple rifting pulses and sedimentation pattern in the Çameli Basin, southwestern Anatolia, Turkey. Sedimentary Geology, 173, 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachelet, B. (1990). Revision of the population of Arvicolids from the Pliocene fauna of Sete (Herault, France). Evidence of the Mimomys capettai lineage. In O. Fejfar & W.-D. Heinrich (Eds.), International symposium evolution, phylogeny and biostratigraphy of arvicolids (pp. 33–40). Prague: Geological Survey of Czechoslovakia.Google Scholar
  4. Böhme, M., & Ilg, A. (2003). fosFARbase. Electronic database. Accessible at: http://www.wahre-staerke.com/. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
  5. Bright, P. W., & Morris, P. A. (2009). Foraging behaviour of dormice Muscardinus avellanarius in two contrasting habitats. Journal of Zoology, 230, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruijn, H. de, & Meulen, A. J. van der (1975). Early Pleistocene Rodents from Tourkoubounia-1 (Athens, Greece). I. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B, 78, 314–338.Google Scholar
  7. Bruijn, H. de, Dawson, M. R., & Mein, P. (1970). Upper Pliocene Rodentia, Lagomorpha and Insectivora (Mammalia) from the Isle of Rhodes (Greece), I, II, III. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B, 73(5), 535–595.Google Scholar
  8. Chaline, J. (1974). Un nouveau critère d’étude des Mimomys, et les rapports de Mimomys occitanus-Mimomys stehlini et Mimomys polonicus (Arvicolidae, Rodentia). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 19(16), 337–356.Google Scholar
  9. Claessens, L. P. A. M. (1997). On the herpetofauna of some Neogene eastern Mediterranean localities and the occurence of Palaeobatrachus and Bufo (Amphibia, Anura) in the lower Miocene of Turkey. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17[Supplement to 3] 39A.Google Scholar
  10. Daams, R. (1999). Family Gliridae. In: Rössner, G. E., & Heissig, K. (eds.). The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe (pp. 301–318). Munich: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
  11. Dam, J. A. van (1997). The small mammals from the Upper Miocene of the Teruel-Alfambra region (Spain): palaeobiology and paleoclimatic reconstructions. Geologica Ultraiectina, 156, 1–204.Google Scholar
  12. Doukas, C. S., Hoek Ostende, L. W. van den, Theocharopoulos, C., Reumer, J. W. F. (1995). Insectivora (Erinaceidae, Talpidae, Soricidae, Mammalia). In: Schmidt–Kittler, N. (ed), The vertebrate locality Maramena (Macedonia, Greece) at the Turolian-Ruscinian boundary. Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, A28: 4364.Google Scholar
  13. Fejfar, O., & Heinrich, W.-D. (1982). Zur Evolution von Mimomys (Rodentia, Mammalia) im Csarnótanum und Villafranchium Europas. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 75(3), 779–793.Google Scholar
  14. Fejfar, O., Heinrich, W.-D., Pevzner, M. A., & Vangengeim, E. A. (1997). Late Cenozoic sequences of mammalian sites in Eurasia: an updated correlation. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 133, 259–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fejfar, O., Mein, P., & Moissenet, E. (1990). Early Arvicolids from the Ruscinian (Early Pliocene) of the Teruel Basin. In O. Fejfar & W.-D. Heinrich (Eds.), International symposium: Evolution, phylogeny and biostratigraphy of arvicolids (Rodentia, Mammalia) (pp. 133–164). Prague: Geological Survey, Czechoslovakia.Google Scholar
  16. Froese, R., & Pauly, D. (eds.) (2013). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Version (10/2013). Available at: www.fishbase.org.
  17. Frost, D. R. (2014). Amphibian species of the world: An online reference. Version 6.0. Electronic database. Accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2014.
  18. Furió, M., & Angelone, C. (2010). Insectivores (Erinaceidae, Soricidae, Talpidae; Mammalia) from the Pliocene of Capo Mannu D1 (Mandriola, central-western Sardinia, Italy). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 258, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furió, M., Casanovas-Vilar, I., & van den Hoek Ostende, L. W. (2011). Predictable structure of Miocene insectivore (Lipotyphla) faunas in Western Europe along a latitudinal gradient. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 304, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Alix, A., Minwer-Barakat, R., Martín Suárez, E., Freudenthal, M., & Martín, J. M. (2008). Late Miocene–Early Pliocene climatic evolution of the Granada Basin (southern Spain) deduced from the paleoecology of the micromammal associations. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 265(3-4), 214–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaudant, J. (1993). L’ichthyofaune lacustre du Miocène d’Etili (Anatolie occidentale, Turquie): un réexamen. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, 6, 335–344.Google Scholar
  22. Gromov, V. J., & Polyakov, I. Y. (Eds.). (1977). Fauna of the SSSR.Mammals, III, 8: voles (Microtinae). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
  23. Hoek Ostende, L. W. van den (2001). Insectivore faunas from the lower Miocene of Anatolia. Part 8: stratigraphy, palaeoecology, palaeobiogeography. Scripta Geologica, 122, 101–122.Google Scholar
  24. Hoek Ostende, L. W. van den, Diepenveen, F., Tesakov, A. S., Saraç, G., Mayhew, D., & Alçiçek, M. C. (2015). On the brink: micromammals from the latest Villanyian from Bıçakçı (Anatolia). Geological Journal. doi: 10.1002/gj.2622.
  25. Holman, J. A. (2000). Fossil snakes of North America: origin, evolution, distribution, paleoecology (p. 357). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hordijk, K., & Bruijn, H. de (2009). The succession of rodent faunas from the Moi/Pliocne lacustrine deposits of the Florina-Ptolemais-Servia Basin (Greece). Hellenic Journal of Geosciences, 44, 21–103.Google Scholar
  27. Ivanov, M. (2007). Herpetological assemblages from the Pliocene to middle Pleistocene in Central Europe: palaeoecological significance. Geobios, 29, 297–320.Google Scholar
  28. Koenigswald, W. von (1980). Schmelzstruktur und Morphologie in den Molaren der Arvicolidae (Rodentia). Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 539, 1–129.Google Scholar
  29. Kowalski, K. (1960). Cricetidae and Microtidae (Rodentia) from the Pliocene of Weze (Poland). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 5(11), 447–506.Google Scholar
  30. LaDuke, T. C. (1991). The fossil snakes of Pit 91, Rancho La Brea, California. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Contributions in Science, 424, 1–28.Google Scholar
  31. Martín Suarez, E., & Mein, P. (1998). Revision of the genera Parapodemus, Apodemus, Rhagamys and Rhagapodemus (Rodentia, Mammalia). Geobios, 31, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maul, L. (1996). A discussion on the referal of Mimomys occitanus Thaler, 1955 (Rodentia, Arvicolidae) to the genus Mimomys. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 39(1), 343–348.Google Scholar
  33. Mayhew, D. F. (1978). Late Pleistocene small mammals from Arnissa (Macedonia, Greece). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B, 81, 302–323.Google Scholar
  34. Mein, P., & Michaux, J. (1970). Un nouveau stade dans l’évolution des rongeurs pliocenes de l’Europe sud-occidentale. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences Paris, 270(D), 2780–2783.Google Scholar
  35. Michaux, J. (1971). Arvicolinae (Rodentia) du Pliocène terminal et du Quaternaire ancien de France et d’Espagne. Palaeovertebrata, 4, 137–214.Google Scholar
  36. Minwer-Barakat, R., García-Alix, A., Martín-Suárez, E., & Freudenthal, M. (2004). Arvicolidae (Rodentia) from the Pliocene of Tollo de Chiclana (Granada, SE Spain). Geobios, 37(5), 619–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pasquier, L. (1974). Dynamique evolutive d’un sous-genre de Muridae, Apodemus (Sylvaemus). Etude biometrique des caracteres dentaires de populations fossils et actuelles d’Europe occidentale. Universite des sciences et techniques du Languedoc, 1-183.Google Scholar
  38. Popov, V. (2004). Pliocene small mammals (Mammalia, Lipotyphla, Chiroptera, Lagomorpha, Rodentia) from Muselievo (North Bulgaria). Geodiversitas, 26(3), 403–491.Google Scholar
  39. Rabeder, G. (1981). Die Arvicoliden (Rodentia, Mammalia) aus dem Pliozän und dem älteren Pleistozän von Niederösterreich. Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich, 8, 1–373.Google Scholar
  40. Radulescu, C., Samson, P., Sen, S., Stiuca, E., Horoi, V. (1997). Les Mammiféres Pliocénes de Dranic (Bassin Dacique, Roumanie). Acte du Congrès BiochroM’97. In: Aguilar, J.-P., Legendre, S., Michaux, J. (eds.). Memoires et Travaux de l’École Pratique des Hautes Études, Institut Montpellier, 21, 635–647.Google Scholar
  41. Rage, J.–C. (1984). Serpentes. In P. Wellnhofer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology, Part 11 (pp. 1–80). Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Rage, J.–C., & Sen, S. (1976). Les amphibians et les reptiles du Pliocène supérieur de Çalta (Turquie). Géologie Mediterranéenne, 3, 127–134.Google Scholar
  43. Reumer, J. W. F. (1984). Ruscinian and early Pleistocene Soricidae (Insectivorea, Mammalia from Tegelen (The Netherlands) and Hungary. Scripta Geologica, 73, 1–173.Google Scholar
  44. Richter, T., & Wächtler, K. (1999). Zur Reproduktionsbiologie von Bithynia tentaculata (L. 1758) in Norddeutschland. Heldia, 4, 47–52.Google Scholar
  45. Roček, Z. (2004). Late Miocene Amphibia from Rudabánya. Palaeontographica Italica, 90, 11–29.Google Scholar
  46. Rückert-Ülkümen, N. (1987). Muş ve Aladağ’ın fauna ve florası hakkında (On fauna and flora of Muş and Aladağ). Bulletin Geological Society of Turkey, 30, 15–18.Google Scholar
  47. Rückert-Ülkümen, N., & Yiğıtbaş, E. (2007). Pharyngeal teeth, lateral ethmoids, and jaw teeth of fishes and additional fossils from the late Miocene (Late Khersonian / Early Maeotian) of Eastern Paratethys (Yalova, near Istanbul, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 16, 211–224.Google Scholar
  48. Rückert-Ülkümen, N., Böhme, M., Reichenbacher, B., Heissig, K., Witt, W., & Bassler, B. (2002). Die Fossilführung des kontinentalen Neogens (Ober-Miozän/Unter-Pliozän) von Develiköy (Manisa, Türkei). Mitteilungen Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie Historische Geologie, 42, 51–74. + 3 plates.Google Scholar
  49. Sanchiz, B. (1998). Salientia. In P. Wellnhofer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology, Part 4 (pp. 1–275). München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
  50. Saraç, G. (2003). Vertebrate fossil localities of Turkey. Scientific Report No. 10609. Ankara: The General Directorate of the Mineral Research and Exploration of Turkey (MTA).Google Scholar
  51. Sen, S., Bouvraine, G., & Geraads, D. (1998). Pliocene vertebrate locality of Çalta, Ankara, Turkey. 12. Paleoecology, biogeography and biochronology. Geodiversitas, 20, 497–510.Google Scholar
  52. Şenel, M. (1997). Geological maps of Turkey in 1:250000 scale: Fethiye sheet. Ankara: Mineral Research and Explanation Directorate of Turkey.Google Scholar
  53. Sickenberg, O., Becker-Platen, J. D., Benda, L., Berg, D., Engesser, B., Gaziry, W., Heissig, K., Hünermann, K. A., Sondaar, P. Y., Schmidt-Kittler, N., Staesche, K., Staesche, U., Steffrens, P., & Tobien, H. (1975). Die Gliederung des höheren Jungtertiärs und Altquartärs in der Türkei nach Vertebraten und ihre Bedeutung für die internationale Neogen-Stratigraphie. Geologisches Jahrbuch Reihe B, Hefte, 15, 1–167.Google Scholar
  54. Simons, A. M., & Mayden, R. L. (1997). Phylogenetic relationships of the creek chubs and the spine-fins: an enigmatic group of North American cyprinid fishes (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae). Cladistics, 13, 187–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Špinar, Z. V. (1972). Tertiary frogs from Central Europe (p. 286). The Hague: Dr. W. Junk N.V.Google Scholar
  56. Storch, G., & Dahlmann, T. (1995). Murinae (Rodentia, Mammalia). In Schmidt-Kittler, N. (ed.) The vertebrate locality Maramena. Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen A, 28, 121–132.Google Scholar
  57. Suata-Alpaslan, F. (2010). The paleoecology of the continental early Pliocene of the eastern Mediterranean, a construction based on rodents. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 31(2), 29–48.Google Scholar
  58. Tadajewska, M. (1998). Pharyngeal teeth and shape of the ossa pharyngea inferiora during development of Abramis brama (L.) and Blicca bjoerkna (L.) (Cyrprinidae). Cybium, 22, 123–147.Google Scholar
  59. Tesakov, A. S. (1998). Voles of the Tegelen fauna. Mededelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen TNO, 60, 71–134.Google Scholar
  60. Tesakov, A. S. (2004). Biostratigraphy of middle Pliocene (Eopleistocene of Eastern Europe (based on small mammals), p. 247). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  61. The Reptile Database (2013). Electronic database, Accessible at: http://reptile-database.org/ Accessed 26 Feb 2014.
  62. Topachevsky, V. A., & Nesin, V. A. (1989). Rodents of the Moldavian and the Khaprovian faunistic complexes of the Kotlovina section (p. 134). Kiev: Naukova Dumka.Google Scholar
  63. Ünay, E. (2006). Rodents from the upper Miocene hominoid locality Çorakyerler (Anatolia). Beiträge zur Paläontologie, 30, 453–467.Google Scholar
  64. Ünay, E., & Bruijn, H. de (1998). Plio-Pleistocene rodents and lagomorphs from Anatolia. Mededelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen TNO, 60, 431–466.Google Scholar
  65. Weerd, A. van de (1979). Early Ruscinian rodents and lagomorphs (Mammalia) from the lignites near Ptolemais (Macedonia, Greece). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B, 82(2), 127–170.Google Scholar
  66. Venczel, M. (2004). Middle Miocene anurans from the Carpathian Basin. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 271, 151–174.Google Scholar
  67. Venczel, M., & Sen, S. (1994). Pleistocene amphibians and reptiles from Emirkaya-2, Turkey. Herpetological Journal, 4, 159–165.Google Scholar
  68. Wautier, K., Heyden, C. van der, & Huysseune, A. (2001). A quantitative analysis of pharyngeal tooth shape in the zebrafish (Danio rerio, Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Archives of Oral Biology, 46, 67–75.Google Scholar
  69. Weerd, A. van de (1976). Rodent faunas of the Mio-Pliocene continental sediments of the Teruel-Alfambra region, Spain. Utrecht Micropalaeontological Bulletin Special Publication, 2, 1–217.Google Scholar
  70. Weerd, A. van de (1979). Early Ruscinian rodents and lagomorphs (Mammalia) from the lignites near Ptolemais (Macedonia, Greece). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B, 82(2), 127–170.Google Scholar
  71. Wuttke, M., Přikryl, T., Ratnikov, V. Y., Dvořák, Z., & Roček, Z. (2012). Generic diversity and distributional dynamics of the Palaeobatrachidae (Amphibia: Anura). Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 92(3), 367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars W. van den Hoek Ostende
    • 1
    Email author
  • James D. Gardner
    • 2
  • Lysanne van Bennekom
    • 1
  • M. Cihat Alçiçek
    • 3
  • Alison Murray
    • 4
  • Frank P. Wesselingh
    • 1
  • Hülya Alçiçek
    • 3
  • Alexey Tesakov
    • 5
  1. 1.Naturalis Biodiversity CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Royal Tyrrell Museum of PalaeontologyDrumhellerCanada
  3. 3.Department of Geological EngineeringPamukkale UniversityDenizliTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  5. 5.Russian Academy of SciencesGeological InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations