Evolution of the incisal relationship in a Central European population (1870/1970)

  • O. Laplanche
  • J.-D. Orthlieb
  • M. Laurent
  • O. Vyslozil
  • O. Dutour
Original article


Recent studies have supported the hypothesis that there is a tendency to evolution in the occlusal relationships of urban populations. Due to its role in the stomatognathic system and the hypothesis of the role of deep overbite in the appearance and development of TMD, particular interest is given to the incisal relationship and its evolution in urban populations. Incisal situation and relationship can be studied with anthropometric and cephalomatric determinants. This study compares the incisal relationship of two groups of young Caucasian adults born in 1870 and 1970, respectively. Twenty-four anthropometric and cephalometric points were analyzed for 30 subjects from each group. A statistically significant difference between the 1870/1970 samples was found for the following criteria (p<0.001): overbite: 1.17/3.81, position of the free edge of the mandibular incisor, sagittal values (orthodontic norm PAO) 78.75 mm/82.88 mm, position of the free edge of the mandibular incisor, vertical values 54.74 mm/58.87 mm, FMIA angle: 65.97°/58.4° and Angle classes: difference in distribution of the skeletal classes (Classes I, II and III) between the two populations (increase in Class II, 1970). Within the limits of this study results show a remarkable increase in overbite, a tendency towards a reduced prevalence of class III malocclusions and an increased prevalence of Class II malocclusions with vestibular position of the mandibular incisors.


Occlusion Incisor Anterior guidance Overbite Overjet Craniofacial évolution Anthropology 


  1. O. Akermann F. Le mécanisme des machoires Masson et Cie (Paris) 1953Google Scholar
  2. Andrick P. Vorkommen der Geùbi Bibanomalien in der Welt. Anthropol Bratislava 1971;16:9–18Google Scholar
  3. Andrick P. Die Entwicklung der Bibanomalien vo, neolithikum bis zur Gegenwart Fortschr Kieferorthop 1963;24:12–21Google Scholar
  4. Ash MM. Occlusion: Reflections on science and clinical reality. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:373–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beyron H. Occlusal relation and mastication in australian aborigines. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1964;6:598–678Google Scholar
  6. Brabant H. L'évolution de l'appareil masticateur humain, du paléolithique à nos jours. Odontostomatologique du nord de la France 1964;334:232–5Google Scholar
  7. Coruccini RS. Bite force variations related to occlusal variation in rural and urban Punjabis. Arch Oral Biol 1985;30:65–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D'Amico A. Application of the concept of functional relation of the natural teeth of the man. J S Calif Dent Ass 1959;27:39Google Scholar
  9. D'Amico A. The canine teeth. Normal functional relation of the natural teeth of man. J S Calif Dent Ass 1958;6–23Google Scholar
  10. Dausch Neumann D. cité dans Kenntner Die Veränderung der Köpergrösse des Menschen Dissertationsschrift, Universität des Saarlandes, Karlsruhe 1963Google Scholar
  11. Dos Santos J Jr, Blackman RB, Nelson SJ. Vectorial analysis of the static equilibrium of forces generated in the mandible in centric occlusion, group function, and balanced occlusion relationships. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1991;65:(4):557–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ernst T, Inke G. Die BiBlagen und Stellundgsanomalien beim Affen im Vergleich zur mensclichen Pathologie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1966;2:247–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaspard M. Essai d'analyse biomécanique comparative de la mastication chez les carnivores les anthropoïdes et l'homme Revue d'Odonto. Stomatologie 1967;85–108Google Scholar
  14. Gola R. Report of the International congress of Collège National d'Occlusodontie Reims. CNO edition Paris 2001Google Scholar
  15. Guichard P, Mafart B, Orthlieb JD. Comparison of occlusion in medieval and present-day populations in southeast France. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120(6):585–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holly Smith B. et coll. Säkulare Trends der Gesischtsdimensionen. Inf Irthod Kieferorthop 1991;23:153–66Google Scholar
  17. Huang BY, Whittle T, Peck CC, Murray GM. Ipsilateral interferences and working-side condylar movements. Arch Oral Biol 2006;51:206–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingervall B. Tooth contacts on the functional and non-functional side in children and young adults. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17:191–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishigaki S, Kurozumi T, Morishige E, Yatani H. Occlusal interference during mastication can cause pathological tooth mobility. J Periodont Res 2006;41:189–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lacroix P, Laurent M, Laplanche O. Le surplomb et le recouvrement incisif dans l'évolution du guide antérieur Info. Dent 2000;40:3473–8Google Scholar
  21. Laplanche O, Pédeutour P, Laurent M, Mahler P, Orthlieb JD. Le guide antérieur et ses anomalies, incidence sur la cinématique condylienne. Cah Prothèse 2002;117:43–55Google Scholar
  22. Laplanche Olivier. Evolution du guide incisif :phylogénèse ou adaptation fonctionnelle mémoire d'attestation universitaire: concepts généraux et champs d'applications de l'Anthropologie Biologique Marseille 1997Google Scholar
  23. Lautrou A, Servières F. Analyse critique de la conception occluso fonctionnelle de D'Amico: données comparatives. Les cahiers de Prothèse 197:13:59–80Google Scholar
  24. Lee RL. Anterior guidance in: "Advance in occlusion" Lundeen HC. et Gibbs C. Boston John Wright PSG Inc. edit 1982Google Scholar
  25. Linder-Aronson S. Die Wirkung der Atemfunktion auf das Kauorgan Internat. Kieferorth Fortbildungswoche Bad Gastein 1979Google Scholar
  26. Lundeen HC, Gibbs CH. The function of teeth. The physiology of mandibular function related to occlusal form and esthetics. USA: L and G Publishers LLC; 2005Google Scholar
  27. Mac Horris WH. The importance of anterior teeth. J Gnathol 1982;1(1)Google Scholar
  28. Ogawa M, Ogawa T, Koyano K, Suetsugu T. Effect of altered canine guidance on condylar movement during laterotrusion. Int J Primatol 1998;11:139–44Google Scholar
  29. Okano N, Baba K, Igarashi Y. Influence of altered occlusal guidance on masticatory muscle activity during clenching. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(9):679–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion 4th ed. Mosby: St Louis; 1998Google Scholar
  31. Orthlieb JD, Laplanche O, Preckel EB. La fonction occlusale et ses dysfonctionnements. Réalités Cliniques 1997;7:131–46Google Scholar
  32. Preston B. Johannesburg. Internationale Beiträge zur Kieferthopädie Quintessenz Verlag 1986;159–74Google Scholar
  33. Slavicek R. Les principes de l'occlusion. Rev Franç d'Orthopédie Dento Faciale 1983;17:449–90; et 533–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith BH, Garn SM, Hunter WS. Secular trends in face size. Angle Orthod 1986;56(3):196–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Van der Linde PGM. Theoretische und praktische Aspêckte des Zahnengstandes im mensschlichen GebiB. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1976;7:57–80Google Scholar
  36. Vyslozil O, Jonke E. Kritscner Etude comparative orthodontique et anthropométrique de crânes humains de 100 ans et soldats de l'armée fédérale autrichienne. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 1995;29:75–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vyslozil O. Weitchteileinflub auf die GebiBentwicklung. Vortrag Internat. Kieferorth Fortbildungswoche Bad Gastein, 1979Google Scholar
  38. Williamson EH, Lundquist DO. Anterior guidance: its effect on electromyographic activity of the temporal and masseter muscles. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49(6):816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Société française d'orthopédie dento faciale Rapport annuel Les incisives: position céphalométrique et fonction biomécanique 1994;65Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Laplanche
    • 1
  • J.-D. Orthlieb
    • 3
  • M. Laurent
    • 3
  • O. Vyslozil
    • 2
  • O. Dutour
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculté d’OdontologieUniversité de Nice-Sophia AntipolisNiceFrance
  2. 2.Faculté d’Odontologie de MarseilleUniversité de la MéditerranéeMarseilleFrance
  3. 3.Faculté d’Odontologie de VienneViennaAustria
  4. 4.Faculté de Médecine de Marseille, Université de la MéditerranéeUMR 6578 CNRS-EFS-Aix Marseille UniversitéMarseilleFrance
  5. 5.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations