Journal of Population Research

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 319–334 | Cite as

Life course events and residential change: unpacking age effects on the probability of moving



We know that life course events, especially divorce and separation, trigger residential moves, but we know less about how these and other life course events intersect with how far people move and the relationship with labour market change. This research uses data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics Survey in Australia to model a set of life course events and their intersection with the distance of move. I examine essentially positive events, marriage and new births and not so positive events, separation and divorce, and the unexpected events of widowhood and job loss, and their outcomes in the housing market. For the decision to move, the models partly parallel other studies of life course events and their role in the mobility decision, but the results provide enriched results about how age and life course events intersect. The analysis shows in greater detail how age acts as a proxy for complicated life course intersections with moving. The disruption of divorce and separation, as expected, increases the probability of moving but with different effects over distance. Households move in response to these life events but they are much less likely to change metropolitan locations, which reflects the embedded nature of family change and location. Overall, the research enriches previous studies of age-related links to migration and mobility.


Mobility Migration The life course Labour markets 


  1. Andrienko, Y. (2010). The role of distance in returns to geographical mobility: Evidence from the HILDA survey. Working paper. University of Sydney, Economics.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2010). Australian social trends, 2010, Moving house, Catalogue 4102.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, M. (2002) Comparing population mobility in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Population Research and New Zealand Population Review, 169–193, special issue.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, M., & Rees, P. (2006). Comparing migration in Britain and Australia: Harmonization through the use of age time plans. Environment and Planning A, 38, 959–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, M., & Stratton, M. (1998). Understanding the 1996 Census migration data. Journal of the Australian Population Association, 15, 155–170.Google Scholar
  6. Bill, A., & Mitchell, W. (2006). Great expectations-migration and labour market outcomes in Australia. NSW Centre for Full Employment and Equity: University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
  7. Burnley, I., Marshall, N., Murphy, P., & Hugo, G. (2007). Housing factors in welfare migration to and from metropolitan cities in Australia. Urban Policy & Research, 25(3), 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, W. A. V., & Davies Withers, S. (2009). Family formation, mobility and labor force participation: A study in synchronicity. Population Space and Place, 15, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C., & Dieleman, F. M. (1994). Tenure changes in the context of micro-level family and macro level economic shifts. Urban Studies, 31, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, W. A. V., & Dieleman, F. (1996). Households and housing: Choice and outcomes in the housing market. Rutgers, NJ: State University, Center for Urban Policy Research.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, W. A. V., & Huang, Y. (2004). Linking migration and mobility: Individual and contextual effects in British housing markets. Regional Studies, 38, 617–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Courgeau, D. (1985). Interaction between spatial mobility, family and career life cycle: A French survey. European Sociological Review, 1, 139–162.Google Scholar
  13. Dewilde, C. (2008). Divorce and the housing movements of owner-occupiers: A European comparison. Housing Studies, 23(6), 809–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewilde, C. (2009). Divorce and housing: A European comparison of the housing consequences of divorce for men and women. In H.-J. Andreß & D. Hummelsheim (Eds.), When marriage ends. Economic and social consequences of partnership dissolution (pp. 263–285). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Dieleman, F., & Schouw, R. (1989). Divorce, mobility and housing demand. European Journal of Population, 5, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DiPasquale, D., & Wheaton, W. (1998). Urban economics and real estate markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Hanuschek, E., & Quigley, J. (1978). An explicit model of intra-metropolitan mobility. Land Economics, 54, 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hassan, R., Zang, X., & McDonnell-Baum, S. (1996). Why families move: A study of residential mobility in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 32, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hugo, G. (2008). Immigration settlement outside of Australian capital cities. Population Space and Place, 14, 553–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hugo, G., & Harris, S. (2011). Population distribution effect of migration in Australia. Adelaide: University of Adelaide, Report to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship.Google Scholar
  21. Maher, C. (1994). Residential mobility, locational disadvantage and spatial inequality in Australian cities. Urban Policy and Research, 12(3), 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maher, C., Whitelaw, J., McAllister, A., Francis, R., et al. (1992). Mobility and locational disadvantage within Australian cities: Social justice implications of household relocation, Social Justice Research program into locational disadvantage, report 2. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  23. Mulder, C. H. (1993). Migration dynamics: A life course approach. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Mulder, C. H., Clark, W. A. V., & Wagner, M. (2002). A comparative analysis of household formation in The United States, The Netherlands and West Germany. Demographic Research, 7, 566–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulder, C. H., & Wagner, M. (1993). Migration and marriage in the life course: A method for studying synchronized events. European Journal of Population, 9, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulder, C. H., & Wagner, M. (2012). Moving after separation: The role of location-specific capital. Housing Studies, 27(6), 839–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Odland, J., & Shumway, J. M. (1993). Interdependencies in the timing of migration and mobility events. Papers in Regional Science, 72(3), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabbe, B., & Taylor, M. (2010). Residential mobility, quality of neighborhood and life course events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 173, 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rindfuss, R. R., Swicegood, C. G., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (1987). Disorder in the life course: How common and does it matter? American Sociological Review, 52, 785–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogers, A., & Castro, L. J. (1981). Model migration schedules. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
  31. Ryan, C., & Whelan, S. (2010). Locational disadvantage, socio-economic status and mobility behavior—evidence from Australia. Canberra: Research School of Economics, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  32. Watson, N., & Wooden, M. (2012). The HILDA Survey: A case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3(3), 369–381.Google Scholar
  33. Wilkens, R., Warren, D., Hahn, M., & Houng, B. (2010). Families, incomes and jobs, vol. 5: A statistical report on waves 1–7 of the household, income and labour dynamics in Australia Survey. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations