Advertisement

Journal of Population Research

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 133–149 | Cite as

An evaluation of the recent fertility changes in Afghanistan: a parity-specific analysis

  • Thomas SpoorenbergEmail author
Article

Abstract

Very limited studies exist on the demography of Afghanistan. Using the only national survey with complete birth history data, the 2010 Afghanistan Mortality Survey, this paper describes the recent fertility changes in the country from a parity-specific perspective. From 1995 to 2009, parity progression ratios, average birth intervals, sex ratio at birth by parity and synthetic lifetime average parity are successively examined. Results show that the progression to higher-order births started to decline in the early 2000s and was accompanied by childbearing postponement. The consistency of the parity analysis is assessed by looking at the sex ratio at birth by parity and comparing the synthetic lifetime average parity to fertility estimates computed from other datasets and/or estimation methods. While the sex ratio at birth indicates strong distortion, casting doubt on the ultimate fertility level, the consistency of the parity-based fertility estimates with other fertility estimates corroborates the fact that misreporting the sex of the child is mainly causing the imbalanced sex ratio at birth and is not significantly affecting the level of fertility. The SPPRs-based analysis provides solid evidence that Afghanistan is in the early stage of its fertility transition.

Keywords

Fertility Parity Data quality Estimation Afghanistan 

References

  1. Afghan Public Health Institute, Ministry of Public Health (APHI/MoPH) [Afghanistan], Central Statistics Organization (CSO) [Afghanistan], ICF Macro, Indian Institute of Health Management Research (IIHMR) [India], and World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (WHO/EMRO) [Egypt]. (2011). Afghanistan Mortality Survey 2010. Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, F. (1990). Assessment of the quality of birth history data in the demographic and health surveys. In Institute for Resource Development, An assessment of DHS-I data quality (pp. 83–111). Calverton, MD: Institute for Resource Development/Macro Systems, Inc., Methodological Reports no. 1.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, L. A., Mawji, S., Whitehead, S., Crouse, C., Dalil, S., Ionete, D., Salama, P, Afghan Maternal Mortality Study Team. (2005). Where giving birth is a forecast of death: Maternal mortality in four districts of Afghanistan, 1999–2002. The Lancet, 365(9462), 864–870.Google Scholar
  4. Central Statistics Organization (CSO) and UNICEF. (2003). Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey2003. Afghnistan. Detail table. December 2003. Kabul: CSO and UNICEF Afghanistan Country Office.Google Scholar
  5. Central Statistics Organization (CSO) and UNICEF. (2012). Afghanistan Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 20102011: Final Report. Kabul: Central Statistics Organization (CSO) and UNICEF. Available online (Accessed December 6, 2012) from http://cso.gov.af/Content/files/AMICS-Jun24-2012-FINAL.pdf.
  6. Chahnazarian, A. (1988). Determinants of the sex ratio at birth: Review of recent literature. Social Biology, 35(3–4), 214–235.Google Scholar
  7. Cho, L.-J., Retherford, R. D., & Choe, M. K. (1986). The own-children method of fertility estimation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chu, S., Hill, R., & Graham, S. (1975). National demographic and family guidance study of the settled population of Afghanistan. Volume I: Demography. Washington, DC: Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  9. East-West Center (1992). EASWESPOP: Fertility estimate programs. Honolulu. Available at http://www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/resources/research/PDFs/manual_fertility_estimate.pdf.
  10. Feeney, G. (1983). Population dynamics based on birth intervals and parity progression. Population Studies, 37(1), 77–89.Google Scholar
  11. Feeney, G., & Yu, J. (1987). Period parity progression measures of fertility in China. Population Studies, 41(1), 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinde, A. (1998). Demographic methods. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  13. Hosseini-Chavoshi, M., McDonald, P., & Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J. (2006). The Iranian fertility decline, 1981–1999: An application of the synthetic parity progression ratio method. Population-E, 61(5–6), 701–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ICON Institute. (2009). National risk and vulnerability assessment 2007/8. A profile of Afghanistan. Main report, Kabul: Jehoon Printing Press.Google Scholar
  15. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and UNICEF. (2006). Best estimates of social indicators for children in Afghanistan, 1990–2005. Kabul: Central Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  16. Khalidi, N. A. (1989). Demographic Profile of Afghanistan, International Population Dynamics Program, Department of Demography, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Research Note no. 106 (December 14, 1989).Google Scholar
  17. Lerch, M. (2013). Fertility decline during Albania’s societal crisis and its subsequent consolidation. European Journal of Population, Online First article, published January 22, 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Public Health (Transitional Islamic Government of Afghanistan) (2003). Basic package of health services for Afghanistan, Kabul, March 2003/1382.Google Scholar
  19. Ministry of Public Health, John Hopkins University and Indian Institute of Health Management Research. (2008). Afghanistan Health Survey 2006. Estimates of priority health indicators for rural Afghanistan. Kabul.Google Scholar
  20. Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1987). Period parity progression ratios and birth intervals in England and Wales, 1941–1971: A synthetic life table analysis. Population Studies, 41(2), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pullum, T. W. (2004). Natality. Measures based on censuses and surveys. In J. S. Siegel & D. A. Swanson (Eds), The methods and materials of demography, 2nd ed. (pp. 407–428). Amsterdam: Elsevier, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pullum, T. W. (2006). An assessment of age and date reporting in the Demographic and Health Surveys, 1985–2003. Calverton, MD: Demographic and Health Surveys Project, ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  23. Spoorenberg, T. (2009). The impact of the political and economic transition on fertility and family formation in Mongolia: A synthetic parity progression ratios analysis. Asian Population Studies, 5(2), 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spoorenberg, T. (2010). Fertility transition in India between 1977 and 2004. Analysis using parity progression ratios. Population-E, 65(2), 315–332.Google Scholar
  25. Spoorenberg, T., & Dommaraju, P. (2012). Regional fertility transition in India: An analysis using synthetic parity progression ratios. International Journal of Population Research, Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 358409.Google Scholar
  26. Timæus, I. M., & Moultrie, T. A. (2012). Estimation of fertility by reverse survival. In T. A. Moultrie et al. (Eds). Tools for demographic estimation. Paris: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. Available online (Accessed December 10, 2012) http://demographicestimation.iussp.org/content/reverse-survival-methods.
  27. Trussell, J., & Brown, E. (1979). A close look at the demography of Afghanistan. Demography, 16(1), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Viswanathan, K., Becker, S., Hansen, P. M., Kumar, D., Kumar, B., Niayesh, H., et al. (2010). Infant and under-five mortality in Afghanistan: Current estimates and limitations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(8), 576–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Population Estimates and Projections Section, Population Division/DESAUnited Nations Population DivisionNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations