Advertisement

Journal of Population Research

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 39–65 | Cite as

The role of education in the reconciliation between female occupation and family responsibilities at mid-life: the Italian case

  • Valeria BordoneEmail author
  • Alessandro Rosina
Article

Abstract

This study, based on the data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, deals with the labour market participation of mid-aged women and the reconciliation with family responsibilities. The analysis focuses on Italy, a fast ageing country with a very low female occupation rate. By performing a comparison with Sweden and France, we set three European models, different in terms of welfare system and gender roles, against each other. Women’s educational attainment is shown to be the most important factor associated with being in the labour market between 50 and 59 years old in all the countries analysed. Our findings suggest a couple-oriented approach to study women’s balancing of career and family: for married women, husbands’ education plays an ambivalent role concerning women's participation in the labour market, according to its combination with wives’ resources. The depressive effect on female employment of living close to a parent in poor health holds especially in Italy, suggesting the need to invest more on welfare policies in this country.

Keywords

Female labour force participation Human capital Family support Italy Ageing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper uses data from SHARE release 2.3.1, as of 29 July 2010. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th framework program (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic program Quality of Life), through the 6th framework program (projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE, CIT5-CT-2005-028857, and SHARELIFE, CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and through the 7th framework program (SHARE-PREP, 211909 and SHARE-LEAP, 227822). Additional funding from the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, Y1-AG-4553-01 and OGHA 04-064, IAG BSR06-11, R21 AG025169) as well as from various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see http://www.share-project.org for a full list of funding institutions). This research was partly funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): Z171-G11.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Ichino, A., & Karabarbounis, L. (2011). Gender-based taxation and the division of family chores. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(2), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apps, P. F., & Rees, R. (1988). Taxation and the household. Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austen, S., & Ong, R. (2010). The employment transitions of mid-life women: Health and care effects. Ageing and Society, 30, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Enlarged edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (2007). Human capital. In D. R. Henderson (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of economics. http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/HumanCapital.html.
  9. Bernardi, F. (1999). Donne fra famiglia e carriera. Strategie di coppia e vincoli sociali. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  10. Bernardi, F. (2001). The employment behaviour of married women in Italy. In H. P. Blossfeld & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Careers of couples in contemporary societies (pp. 121–145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bernasco, W. (1994). Coupled careers: The effects of spouse’s resources on success at work. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Bernasco, W., De Graaf, P. M., & Ultee, W. C. (1998). Coupled careers: Effects of spouse’s resources on occupational attainment in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 14(1), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernhardt, E., & Goldscheider, F. (2002). Children and union formation in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 18(3), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blome, A., Keck, W., & Alber, J. (Eds.). (2009). Family and the welfare state in Europe. Intergenerational relations in ageing societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. Blossfeld, H. P., & Drobnic, S. (Eds.). (2001). Careers of couples in contemporary societies: from male breadwinner to dual earner families. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Blossfeld, H. P., Klijzing, E., Pohl, K., & Rohwer, G. (1996). Modellierung paralleler und interdependenter Prozesse in der Bevölkerungwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungwissenschaft, 21, 29–56.Google Scholar
  17. Börsch-Supan, A., Brugiavini, A., Jürges, H., Mackenbach, J., Siegrist, J., & Weber, G. (2005). Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA).Google Scholar
  18. Börsch-Supan, A., & Jürges, H. (Eds.). (2005). The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe—methodology. Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing.Google Scholar
  19. Browning, M. (1992). Children and household economic behavior. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3), 1434–1475.Google Scholar
  20. Chiappori, P. A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56(1), 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Crespo, L. (2006). Caregiving and employment status of European mid-life women. CEMFI Working Paper: University of Alicante.Google Scholar
  23. D’Addio, A. C., & Mira d’Ercole, M. (2005). Trends and determinants of fertility rates in OECD countries: The role of policies. OECD Social, employment and migration working papers.Google Scholar
  24. Dalla Zuanna, G., & Micheli, G. A. (2004). Strong family and low fertility: A paradox? New perspectives in interpreting contemporary family and reproductive behaviour. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Del Boca, D., & Rosina, A. (2009). Famiglie sole. Sopravvivere con un welfare insufficiente. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  26. Del Boca, D., & Vuri, D. (2007). The mismatch between employment and child care in Italy: The impact of rationing. Journal of Population Economics, 20(4), 805–832. doi: 10.1007/s00148-006-0126-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Di Giulio, P., & Rosina, A. (2007). Intergenerational family ties and the diffusion of cohabitation in Italy. Demographic Research, 16(14), 441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ettner, S. L. (1996). The opportunity costs of elder care. Journal of Human Resources, 31(1), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grundy, E., & Henretta, J. C. (2006). Between elderly parents and adult children: A new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich generation’. Ageing & Society, 26, 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill, E. J., Maertinson, V. K., Ferris, M., & Zenger Baker, R. (2004). Beyond the mommy track: The influence of new-concept part-time work for professional women on work and family. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25(1), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoem, B., & Hoem, J. M. (1988). The Swedish family: Aspects of contemporary developments. Journal of Family Issues, 9(3), 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jansen, M., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2006). Couples’ attitudes, childbirth, and the division of labor. Journal of Family Issues, 27(11), 1487–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kolodinsky, J., & Shirey, L. (2000). The impact of living with an elder parent on adult daughter’s labor supply and hours of work. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21(2), 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamura, G., Mnich, E., & Doehner, H. (2006). The future of informal care of older people in Europe: trends and challenges. Paper presented at conference on The contribution of ICTs to equal opportunities and work-life-balance of informal careers for older people, Brussels, 30 November.Google Scholar
  36. Lesthaeghe, R., & Neels, K. (2002). From the first to the second demographic transition: An interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population, 18(4), 325–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin, N., Vaughn, J. C., & Ensel, W. M. (1981). Social resources and occupational-status attainment. Social Forces, 59(4), 1163–1181.Google Scholar
  38. Loomis, L. S., & Booth, A. (1995). Multigenerational caregiving and wellbeing: The myth of the beleaguered sandwich generation. Journal of Family Issues, 16(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lundberg, S. J., & Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lundberg, S. J., & Pollak, R. A. (2003). Efficiency in marriage. Review of Economics of the Household, 1, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lundberg, S. J., & Pollak, R. A. (2007). The American family and family economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lundberg, S. J., & Pollak, RA. (2008). Family decision making. In S. N. Durlauf, & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics online. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Lutz, W., & Samir, K. C. (2011). Global human capital: Integrating education and population. Science, 333(6042), 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Masuy, A. J. (2009). Effect of caring for an older person on women’s lifetime participation in work. Ageing & Society, 29, 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mencarini, L., & Tanturri, M. L. (2004). Time use, family role-set and childbearing among Italian working women. Genus, 60(1), 111–137.Google Scholar
  48. Micheli, G. A., & Rosina, A. (2006). Il lavoro adulto femminile tra due fuochi. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 114(4), 505–524.Google Scholar
  49. Miller, D. A. (1981). The sandwich generation: Adult children of the aging. Social Work, 26(5), 419–423.Google Scholar
  50. Mills, M., Mencarini, L., Tanturri, M. L., & Begall, K. (2008). Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naldini, M. (2003). The family in the Mediterranean welfare states. London/Portland: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  52. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006). Live longer, work longer. Paris.Google Scholar
  53. Pagani, L., & Marenzi, A. (2008). The labor market participation of sandwich generation Italian women. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(3), 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parsons, T. (1942). Age and sex in the social structure of the United States. American Sociological Review, 7(5), 604–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pinnelli, A. (1995). Women’s condition, low fertility, and emerging union patterns in Europe. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Putney, N. M., & Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Families, intergenerational relations, and kinkeeping in midlife. In M. E. Lachman (Ed.), Handbook of midlife development (pp. 528–570). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Quattrini, S., Melchiorre, M. G., Balducci, C., Spazzafumo, L., & Lamura, G. (2006). EUROFAMCARE: The national survey report for Italy. Ancona: INRCA.Google Scholar
  58. Rosina, A., & Saraceno, C. (2008). Interferenze asimmetriche. Uno studio della discontinuita lavorativa femminile. Economia e Lavoro, 42(2), 149–167.Google Scholar
  59. Rosina, A., & Testa, M. R. (2009). Couples’ first child intentions and disagreement: An analysis of the Italian case. European Journal of Population, 25(4), 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Samuelson, P. (1956). Social indifference curves. Quarterly Journal of Economics., 70(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saraceno, C. (1994). The ambivalent familism of the Italian welfare state. Social Politics, 1(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Saraceno, C. (1997). Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare. In OECD (Ed.), Family, market and community. Equity and efficiency, (Vol. 21, pp. 81–100). Paris: OECD, Social policy studies.Google Scholar
  63. Sundstroem, M., & Stafford, F. P. (1992). Female labour force participation, fertility and public policy in Sweden. European Journal of Population, 8(2), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tomassini, C., Wolf, D. A., & Rosina, A. (2003). Parental housing assistance and parent-child proximity in Italy. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 700–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Bastelaer, A., & Bloendal, L. (2003). Labour reserve: People outside the labour force. In EUROSTAT (Ed.), Statistics in focus: Population and social conditions. Luxembourg: EUROSTAT.Google Scholar
  66. Verbakel, E., & de Graaf, P. M. (2008). Resources of the partner: Support or restriction in the occupational career? Developments in tThe Netherlands between 1940 and 2003. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vlasblom, J. D., & Schippers, J. J. (2004). Increases in female labour force participation in Europe: Similarities and differences. European Journal of Population, 20(4), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weesie, J. (1999). Seemingly unrelated estimation and the cluster-adjusted sandwich estimator. Stata Technical Bulletin, 52, 34–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science & Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wittgenstein Centre (IIASA, VID/ÖAW, WU)Vienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Statistical ScienceUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations