Applications of classification based on similarities and dissimilarities
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
- 62 Downloads
Abstract
In this paper, we first review some definitions and propositions regarding similarities between two objects (2-similarity), or among three or more objects (3-similarity/n-similarity). Then the notion of 3-dissimilarity is introduced and the relationships and connections between 2-dissimilarities and 3-dissimilarities are studied. Through some examples, the applications regarding the concepts of 3-similarity, 4-similarity, and dissimilarity relations will be brought out.
Keywords
3-similarity relations Equivalence 3-relations Dissimilarity relations n-dissimilarityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Alguliev R, Aliguliyev R (2007) Experimental investigating the F-measure as similarity measure for automatic text summarization. Applied and Computational Mathematics 6(2): 278–287Google Scholar
- 2.Jain A, Dubes R (1988) Algorithm for clustring data. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
- 3.Gentner D, Markman A B (1997) Structural alignment in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52(1): 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hahn U, Chater N, Richardson L B (2003) Similarity as transformation. Cognition 87: 1–32MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Keshavarzi M, Dehghan M A, Mashinchi M (2009) Classification based on similarity and dissimilarity through equivalence classes. Applied and Computational Mathematics 8(2): 203–215MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.Keshavarzi M, Dehghan M A, Mashinchi M (2011) Classification based on 3-similarity. Iranian Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Informatics 6(1): 7–21MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 7.Klawonn F, Castro J L (1995) Similarity in fuzzy reasoning. Mathware and Soft Computing 3: 197–228MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 8.Landauer T K, Dumais S T (1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review (104)2: 211–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Larkey L B, Markman A B (2005) Processes of similarity judgment. Cognitive Science 29: 1061–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Loia V, Senatore S, Sessa M (2004) Combining agent technology and similarity-based reasoning for targeted e-mail services. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 145: 29–56MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Rezaei H, Emoto M, Mukaidono M (2006) New similarity measure between two fuzzy sets. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics 10(6): 946–953Google Scholar
- 12.Rissland E L (2006) AI and similarity. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3): 39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Sessa M I (2001) Translation and similarity-based logic programming. Soft Computing 5: 160–170MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Shepard R N (1962) The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. Psychometrika 27(2): 125–140MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Schweitzer B, Sklar A(1983) Probabilistic metric spaces. North-Holland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 16.Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84(4): 327–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Valtchev P (1999) Construction automatique de taxanomies pour l’aide a’ la representaion de connaissance par objects. These de doctorat, Universite Joseph Fourier, Grenoble IGoogle Scholar
- 18.Zadeh L A (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Information Control: 338–353Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and Fuzzy Information and Engineering Branch of the Operations Research Society of China 2012