Advertisement

PalZ

pp 1–9 | Cite as

Pakkokuhyus and Progenitohyus (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) from the Eocene of Southeast Asia are not Helohyidae: paleobiogeographical implications

  • Stéphane Ducrocq
Research Paper

Abstract

Pakkokuhyus and Progenitohyus are two genera of primitive artiodactyls from the Eocene of Southeast Asia that have been referred to the family Helohyidae. However, recent advances in the phylogeny and systematics of basal artiodactyls suggest that the status of several Asian forms should be reassessed. In that frame, reexamination of the few dental remains known for Pakkokuhyus and Progenitohyus indicates that they very probably do not belong to the Helohyidae but to the Dichobunidae. The dental structure of the alleged helohyid Gobiohyus from Asia also suggests that the attribution of this genus to the Helohyidae is questionable. In that context, the representatives of the family Helohyidae probably originated in North America during the Middle Eocene and were never involved in dispersals between Eurasia and North America, contrary to the diacodexeids and homacodontids. This further suggests that the systematics of basal artiodactyls from Southeast Asia should be carefully reassessed.

Keywords

Myanmar Thailand Dichobunoidea Paleobiogeography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks are due to Y. Chaimanee, who provided the original specimen of Progenitohyus for comparisons, to O. Chavasseau for discussions, and to C. Blondel and M. Benammi for their help with bibliography. I warmly thank L. Foley-Ducrocq, who corrected the English, and T. Lehmann and J. Eberhardt, who helped with German translations. The manuscript benefited from comments and suggestions from K. Heissig, F. Lihoreau, the Associate Editor T. Mörs, and the Editor-in-Chief M. Reich. This work has been supported by the ANR-09-BLAN-0238 Program, the CNRS UMR 7262, and the University of Poitiers.

References

  1. Aung Naing Soe, Myitta, Soe Thura Tun, Aye Ko Aung, Tin Thein, B. Marandat, S. Ducrocq, and J.-J. Jaeger 2002. Sedimentary facies of the late middle Eocene Pondaung Formation (central Myanmar) and the palaeoenvironments of its anthropoid primates. Comptes Rendus Palevol 1: 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aung Naing Soe, O. Chavasseau, Y. Chaimanee, Chit Sein, J.-J. Jaeger, X. Valentin, and S. Ducrocq. 2017. New remains of Siamotherium pondaungensis (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamoidea) from the Eocene of Pondaung (Myanmar): paleoecologic and phylogenetic implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2017.1270290.Google Scholar
  3. Beard, K.C., and B. Wang. 1991. Phylogenetic and biogeographic significance of the tarsiiform primate Asiomomys changbaicus from the Eocene of Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 85: 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beard, K.C. 1998. East of Eden: Asia as an important center of taxonomic origination in mammalian evolution. Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History 34: 5–39.Google Scholar
  5. Boisserie, J.-R., F. Lihoreau, M. Orliac, R.E. Fisher, E.M. Weston, and S. Ducrocq. 2010. Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 158: 325–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunet, M., and J. Sudre. 1980. Deux nouveaux Dichobunidés (ARtiodactyla, Mammalia) de l’Oligocène inférieur d’Europe—1. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen B83: 121–143.Google Scholar
  7. Coombs, M.C., and W.P. Coombs. 1977. Dentition of Gobiohyus and a reevaluation of the Helohyidae (Artiodactyla). Journal of Mammalogy 58: 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cope, E.D. 1873. Fourth notice of extinct Vertebrata from the Bridger and the Green River Tertiaries. Paleontological Bulletin 17: 1–4.Google Scholar
  9. Ducrocq, S. 1999. The late Eocene Anthracotheriidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from Thailand. Palaeontographica A252: 93–140.Google Scholar
  10. Ducrocq, S., Y. Chaimanee, V. Suteethorn, and J.-J. Jaeger. 1997. First discovery of Helohyidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) in the Late Eocene of Thailand: a possible transitional form for Anthracotheriidae. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris (Sciences de la Terre) 325: 367–372.Google Scholar
  11. Erfurt, J., and J. Sudre. 1996. Eurodexeinae, eine neue Unterfamilie der Artiodactyla (Mammalia) aus dem Unter- und Mitteleozän Europas. Palaeovertebrata 25: 371–390.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrusquia-Villafranca, I. 2006. The first Paleogene mammal record of Middle America: Simojovelhyus pocitosense (Helohyidae, Artiodactyla). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26: 989–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foss, S.E. 2007. Family Helohyidae. In The Evolution of Artiodactyls, eds. D.R. Prothero and S.E. Foss, 85–88. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gazin, C.L. 1956. The geology and vertebrate paleontology of upper Eocene strata in the northeastern part of the Wind River Basin, Wyoming, part 2. The mammalian fauna of the Badwater area. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 131 (8): 1–35.Google Scholar
  15. Heissig, K. 2001. Anthracohyus (Artiodactyla, Mammalia), an Eurasian Achaenodontid. Lynx 32: 97–105.Google Scholar
  16. Holroyd, P.A., and R.L. Ciochon. 1995. A new artiodactyl (Mammalia) from the Eocene Pondaung Sandstones, Burma. Annals of Carnegie Museum 64: 177–183.Google Scholar
  17. Marsh, O.C. 1872. Preliminary description of new Tertiary mammals. American Journal of Science 4: 202–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marsh, O.C. 1876. Notice of new Tertiary mammals. V. American Journal of Science (series 3) 12: 401–404.Google Scholar
  19. Matthew, W.D., and W. Granger. 1925. New mammals from the Irdin Manha Eocene of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 198: 1–10.Google Scholar
  20. Métais, G., J. Guo, and K.C. Beard. 2004. A new small dichobunid artiodactyl from Shanghuang (middle Eocene, eastern China): implications for the early evolution of proto-selenodonts in Asia. Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History 36: 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ni, X., J. Meng, K.C. Beard, D.L. Gebo, Y. Wang, and C. Li. 2010. A new tarkadectine primate from the Eocene of Inner Mongolia, China: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 277: 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orliac, M.J., and S. Ducrocq. 2012. Eocene raoellids (Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla) outside the Indian Subcontinent: palaeogeographical implications. Geological Magazine 149: 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orliac, M.J., and M.A. O’Leary. 2014. Comparative anatomy of the petrosal bone of dichobunoids, early members of Artiodactylamorpha (Mammalia). Journal of Mammalian Evolution 21: 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pilgrim, G.E. 1928. The Artiodactyla of the Eocene of Burma. Palaeontologia Indica 13: 1–39.Google Scholar
  25. Prothero, D.R., B.L. Beatty, and R.M. Stucky. 2013. Simojovelhyus is a peccary, not a helohyid (Mammalia, Artiodactyla). Journal of Paleontology 87: 930–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell, D.E., and R.-J. Zhai. 1987. The Paleogene of Asia: mammals and stratigraphy. Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle 52: 1–488.Google Scholar
  27. Stucky, R.K. 1992. Mammalian faunas in North America of Bridgerian to early Arikareean “Ages” (Eocene and Oligocene). In Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution, eds. D.R. Prothero and W.A. Berggren, 464–493. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stucky, R.K. 1998. Eocene bunodont and bunoselenodont Artiodactyla (“dichobunids’’). In Evolution of Tertiary Mammals in North America. Vol 1: Terrestrial Carnivores, Ungulates, and Ungulatelike Mammals, eds. C.M. Janis, K.M. Scott, and L.L. Jacobs, 358–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Theodor, J.M., J. Erfurt, and G. Métais. 2007. The Earliest Artiodactyls. In The Evolution of Artiodactyls, eds. D.R. Prothero and S.E. Foss, 32–58. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Thewissen, J.G.M., P.D. Gingerich, and D.E. Russell. 1987. Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla (Mammalia) from the early-middle Eocene Kuldana Formation of Kohat (Pakistan). Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan 27: 247–274.Google Scholar
  31. Vislobokova, I.A. 2004. Artiodactyls from the middle Eocene of Khaichin-Ula II, Mongolia. Paleontological Journal 38: 90–96.Google Scholar
  32. Woodburne, M.O., and C.C. Swisher III. 1995. Land mammal high-resolution geochronology, intercontinental overland dispersals, sea level, climate, and vicariance. In Geochronology, time scales and global stratigraphic correlation, eds. W.A. Berggren, D.V. Kent, M.-P. Aubry, and J. Hardenbol, 335–364. Tulsa, Okla: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology, Special Publication 54).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Paläontologische Gesellschaft 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IPHEP, UMR CNRS 7262, Université de Poitiers, UFR SFAPoitiers Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations