Advertisement

PalZ

, Volume 92, Issue 4, pp 593–603 | Cite as

Have ladybird beetles and whiteflies co-existed for at least 40 Mya?

  • Karol SzawarynEmail author
  • Jacek Szwedo
Research Paper

Abstract

The beetle family Coccinellidae is rarely recorded from fossils. Most of the records come from the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth century. A complete list of Coccinellidae records from Baltic amber is presented and discussed. Extensive literature research provided a surprising conclusion that not a single species of Coccinellidae has been formally described from Baltic amber till now. The first two species of ladybird beetles from Eocene Baltic amber are described and placed in the genus Serangium, namely S. twardowskii sp. nov. and S. gedanicum sp. nov. Their phylogenetic placement in the subfamily Microweiseinae is provided. A key to the fossil species of Serangium is given. Extant representatives of the genus are distributed mainly in tropical areas of Asia and Oceania, and are specialised predators of whiteflies. Current discovery shows that during the Middle Eocene, the genus Serangium was distributed wider in the Northern Hemisphere and the evolution of these ladybird beetles was probably influenced by the evolution of whiteflies which are also found in the Baltic amber.

Keywords

Coccinelloidea Serangium Fossil New species Systematics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Piotr Twardowski (Gdańsk, Poland) for his generous donation of the ladybird beetle specimen that is here described to the MAIG, and Mr. Jonas Damzen (Vilnus, Lithuania) who made it possible to study the second specimen. We would also like to thank our colleagues from the University of Gdańsk for their great help in preparation of this manuscript, Elżbieta Sontag and Błażej Bojarski. Agnieszka Klikowicz (International Amber Association, Gdańsk) is acknowledged for her kind help with FT-IR spectra analysis. We would like to thank André Nel and Adam Ślipiński for reviewing this manuscript and for their valuable comments.

Supplementary material

12542_2018_409_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (231 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 232 kb)

References

  1. Bengtson, P. 1998. Open nomenclature. Palaeontology 31: 223–227.Google Scholar
  2. Berendt, G.C. 1845. Die im Bernstein befindlichen organischen Reste der Vorwelt gesammelt, in Verbindung mit Mehreren bearbeitet. Erster Band. Abtheilung I. Der Bernstein und die in ihm befindlichen Pflanzenreste der Vorwelt. Berlin: Nicolai.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackburn, T. 1889. Further notes on Australian Coleoptera, with descriptions of new species. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 11: 175–214.Google Scholar
  4. Booth, R.G., and A. Polaszek. 1996. The identities of ladybird beetle predators used for whitefly control, with notes on some whitefly parasitoids, in Europe. In Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Pests and Diseases—1996: Volume 1. Proceedings of an International Conference, 69–74. Farnham: BCPC.Google Scholar
  5. Casey, T.L. 1899. A revision of the American Coccinellidae. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 7: 71–169.Google Scholar
  6. Chapin, E.A. 1940. New genera and species of lady–beetles related to Serangium Blackburn (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 30: 263–272.Google Scholar
  7. Dejean, P.F.M.A. 1837. Livraison 5. Catalogue des coléoptères de la collection de M. le comte Dejean. Troisième édition, revue, corrigée et augmentée. Paris: Méquignon-Marvis Père et Fils.Google Scholar
  8. Drohojowska, J., and J. Szwedo. 2011. New Aleyrodidae (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodomorpha) from Eocene Baltic amber. Polish Journal of Entomology 80: 659–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emery, C. 1886. Über Phylogenie und Systematik der Insekten. Biologisches Zentralblatt 5: 648–656.Google Scholar
  10. Escalona, H.E., and A. Ślipiński. 2012. Generic revision and phylogeny of Microweiseinae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Systematic Entomology 37: 125–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giorgi, J.A., N.J. Vandenberg, J.V. McHugh, J.A. Forrester, S.A. Ślipiński, K.B. Miller, L.R. Shapiro, and M.F. Whiting. 2009. The evolution of food preferences in Coccinellidae. Biological Control 51: 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goeze, J.A.E. 1777. Entomologische Beiträge zu des Ritter Linné, Zwölften Ausgabe des Natursystems. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erben und Reich.Google Scholar
  13. Goloboff, P.A. 1999. NONA, version 2.0. Tucumán: Published by the author.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, R.D., J. Pakaluk, and S.A. Ślipiński. 1989. Carinodulini, a new tribe of Sticholotidinae based upon a new genus and species from Mexico (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 43: 359–364.Google Scholar
  15. Gyllenhal, L. 1808. Insecta Svecica, Classis I. Coleoptera sive Eleuterata. Tomus I. Scaris: F. J. Leverentz.Google Scholar
  16. Helm, O. 1896. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Insecten des Bernsteins. Schriften der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Danzig 9: 220–231.Google Scholar
  17. Hieke, F., and E. Pietrzeniuk. 1984. Die Bernstein-Käfer des Museums für Naturkunde, Berlin (Insecta: Coleoptera). Mitteilungen des Zoologischen Museums 60: 297–326.Google Scholar
  18. Hope, F.W. 1836. Observations on succinic insects. The Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 1: 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt, T., J. Bergsten, Z. Levkanicova, A. Papadopoulou, O.S. John, R. Wild, P.M. Hammond, D. Ahrens, M. Balke, M.S. Caterino, J. Gomez-Zurita, I. Ribera, T.G. Barraclough, M. Bocakova, L. Bocak, and A.P. Vogler. 2007. A comprehensive phylogeny of beetles reveals the evolutionary origins of a superradiation. Science 318: 1913–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jałoszyński, P., and A. Ślipiński. 2014. Ruthmuelleria, a new genus of Carinodulini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Microweiseinae) from South Africa. Zootaxa 3784: 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirejtshuk, A.G., and A. Nel. 2012. The oldest representatives of the family Coccinellidae (Coleoptera: Polyphaga) from the Lowermost Eocene Oise amber (France). Zoosystematica Rossica 21: 131–144.Google Scholar
  22. Klebs, R. 1910. Über Bernsteineinschlüsse in allgemeinen und die Coleopteren meiner Bernsteinsammlung. Schriften der Physikalisch-Ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg 51: 217–242.Google Scholar
  23. Kovář, I. 1996. Phylogeny. In Ecology of Coccinellidae, ed. I. Hodek, and A. Honek, 19–31. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krassilov, V.A. 2003. Terrestrial paleoecology and global change, vol. 1. Pensoft: Russian Academic Monographs. Sofia and Moscow.Google Scholar
  25. Kubisz, D. 2000. Fossil beetles (Coleoptera) from Baltic amber in the collection of the Museum of Natural History of ISEA in Krakow. Polish Journal of Entomology 69: 225–230.Google Scholar
  26. Kugelann, J.G. 1794. Verzeichniss der in einigen Gegenden Preussens bis jetzt entdeckten Käfer-Arten, nebst kurzen Nachrichten von denselben. Neuest Magazin fur die Liebhaben der Entomologie 1: 513–582.Google Scholar
  27. Kulicka, R., and A. Ślipiński. 1996. A review of the Coleoptera inclusions in the Baltic amber. Prace Muzeum Ziemi 44: 5–11.Google Scholar
  28. Lameere, A. 1938. Évolution des Coléoptèra. Bulletin Annales Société Entomologique de Belgique 78: 355–362.Google Scholar
  29. Larsson, S.G. 1978. Baltic amber—a palaeobiological study. Entomonograph 1: 1–192.Google Scholar
  30. Latreille, P.A. 1802. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des crustacés et des insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite à l’histoire naturelle générale et particulière, composée par Leclerc de Buffon, et rédigée par C.S. Sonnini, membre de plusieurs sociétés savantes. Familles naturelles des genres. Tome troisième. Paris: F. Dufart.Google Scholar
  31. Latreille, P.A. 1807. Genera crustaceorum et insectorum secundum ordinem naturalem in familias disposita, iconibus exemplisque plurimis explicata. Tomus tertius. Paris: A. Koenig.Google Scholar
  32. Lawrence, J.F., A. Ślipiński, A. Seago, M. Thayer, A. Newton, and A. Marvaldi. 2011. Phylogeny of the Coleoptera based on adult and larval morphology. Annales Zoologici 61: 1–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leach, W.E. 1815. Entomology. In Brewster’s Edinburgh Encyclopedia, vol. 9, ed. D. Brewster, 57–172. Edinburgh: Balfour.Google Scholar
  34. LeConte, J.L. 1852. Remarks upon the Coccinellidae of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 6: 129–145.Google Scholar
  35. Leng, C.W. 1920. Catalogue of the Coleoptera of America, North of Mexico. New York, Mount Vernon: J. D. Sherman, Jr.Google Scholar
  36. Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria maturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, vol. 1, Edn 10 (reformata). Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
  37. Linnaeus, C. 1767. Systema naturae, vol. I. Pars II. Edn 12, (reformata), 533–1327. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
  38. Maddison, W.P., and D.R. Maddison. 2017. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.2 http://mesquiteproject.org.
  39. Magro, A., E. Lecompte, F. Magné, J.L. Hemptinne, and B. Crouau-Roy. 2010. Phylogeny of ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): are the subfamilies monophyletic? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthews, S.C. 1973. Notes on open nomenclature and synonym lists. Palaeontology 16: 1713–1719.Google Scholar
  41. McKenna, D.D., A.L. Wild, K. Kanda, C.L. Belamy, R.G. Beutel, M.S. Caterino, C.W. Farnum, D.C. Hawks, M.A. Ivie, M.L. Jameson, R.A.B. Leschen, A.E. Marvaldi, J.V. McHugh, A.F. Newton, J.A. Robertson, M.K. Thayer, M.F. Whitng, J.F. Lawrence, A. Ślipiński, D.R. Maddison, and B.D. Farrel. 2015. The beetle tree of life reveals that Coleoptera survived end-Permian mass extinction to diversify during the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution. Systematic Entomology 40: 835–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Menge, F.A. 1856. Lebenszeichen vorweltlicher im Bernstein eingeschlossener Thiere (Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera). (Öffentliches Programm der Petrischule Danzig), 1–32. Danzig: Kafemann.Google Scholar
  43. Miyatake, M. 1994. Revisional studies on Asian genera of the subfamily Sticholotidinae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Memoirs of the College of Agriculture, Ehime University 38: 223–292.Google Scholar
  44. Mulsant, É. 1850. Species des Coléoptères trimères sécuripalpes. Annales des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles, d’Agriculture et d’Industrie 2 (2): 1–1104.Google Scholar
  45. Mulsant, É., and C. Rey. 1853. Description de trois coléoptères nuveaus de la famille des Scymnines. Opuscules Entomologiques 2: 86–90.Google Scholar
  46. Nixon, K.C. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nixon, K.C. 2002. Winclada, Version 1.00.08. Ithaca: Published by the author.Google Scholar
  48. Pope, R.D. 1962. A review of the Pharini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). The Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4: 627–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Redtenbacher, L. 1843. Tentamen dispositionis generum et specierum Coleopterorum Pseudotrimerorum Archiducatus Austriae, 1–32. Vindobonae: C. Ueberreuter.Google Scholar
  50. Robertson, J.A., A. Ślipiński, M. Moulton, F.W. Shockley, A. Giorgi, N.P. Lord, D.D. McKenna, W. Tomaszewska, J. Forrester, K.B. Miller, M.F. Whiting, and J.V. McHugh. 2015. Phylogeny and classification of Cucujoidea and the recognition of a new superfamily Coccinelloidea (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia). Systematic Entomology 40: 745–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sasaji, H. 1968. Phylogeny of the family Coccinellidae (Coleoptera). Etizenia, Occasional Publications of the Biological Laboratory, Fukui University 35: 1–37.Google Scholar
  52. Seago, A., J.A. Giorgi, J. Li, and A. Ślipiński. 2011. Phylogeny, classification and evolution of ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) based on simultaneous analysis of molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 60: 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ślipiński, A. 2007. Australian Ladybird Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): their biology and classification. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Water Resources.Google Scholar
  54. Ślipiński, S.A., and D. Burckhardt. 2006. Revision of the Australian Coccinellidae (Coccinellidae). Part 5. Tribe Serangiini. Annales Zoologici 56: 37–58.Google Scholar
  55. Szwedo, J. 2012. Life in the Eocene forests. In World Amber Council Seminar. Gdańsk the World Amber Capital, Gdańsk, eds. R. Pytlos, R. Szadziewski, A. Zbierska, G. Adamska, and A. Dmowska, 60–74. Gdańsk: Mayor’s Office for City Promotion, City Hall of Gdańsk.Google Scholar
  56. Szwedo, J., and A. Stroiński. 2017. Who’s that girl? The singular Tropiduchidae planthopper from the Eocene Baltic amber (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha). Palaeontologia Electronica 20 (3): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Szwedo, J., and J. Drohojowska. 2016. A swarm of whiteflies—the first record of gregarious behaviour from Eocene Baltic amber. The Science of Nature 103 (35): 1–6.Google Scholar
  58. Toussaint, E.F.A., M. Seidel, E.A. Varela, J. Hajek, D. Kral, L. Sekerka, A.E.Z. Short, and M. Fikacek. 2017. The peril of dating beetles. Systematic Entomology 42: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang, X.-M., and S.-X. Ren. 2012. A new genus Pangia belonging to the tribe Serangiini from China (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 87: 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wappler, T. 2003. Systematik, Phylogenie, Taphonomie und Paläoökologie der Insekten aus dem Mittel-Eozän des Eckfelder Maares, Vulkaneifel. Clausthaler Geowissenschaften 2: 1–241.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paläontologische Gesellschaft 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Evolutionary Entomology and Museum of Amber Inclusions, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of GdańskGdańskPoland

Personalised recommendations