Paläontologische Zeitschrift

, Volume 89, Issue 4, pp 961–981 | Cite as

Postcranial material of Nothosaurus marchicus from the Lower Muschelkalk (Anisian) of Winterswijk, The Netherlands, with remarks on swimming styles and taphonomy

  • Nicole Klein
  • Dennis F. A. E. Voeten
  • Jos Lankamp
  • Remco Bleeker
  • Oliver J. Sichelschmidt
  • Marco Liebrand
  • Dennis C. Nieweg
  • P. Martin Sander
Research Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The postcranial morphology of Nothosaurus from Winterswijk is described on the basis of three partially preserved skeletons. Because of the association with a diagnostic cranium, two of these can be confidently assigned to N. marchicus. Preserved humeri are recognized as morphotype II, which confirms the relationship between this humeral morphotype and N. marchicus. The occurrence of an additional nothosaur taxon in the Lower Muschelkalk, strong sexual dimorphism, or a broader size range of N. marchicus is evidenced again. The postcranial morphology of Nothosaurus is compared to published and new data on the basal pistosauroid (cf. Cymatosaurus) from the same locality. Numerous shared morphological characters of N. marchicus, Nothosaurus sp., and the basal pistosauroid from Winterswijk hamper assignment of isolated bones, which is presently only possible if a combination of features on multiple bones from a single individual can be assessed. Ontogenetic stage of the described skeletons is discussed as well. Differences between N. marchicus, the basal pistosauroid, and the morphologically similar, but smaller pachypleurosaur A. heterodontus are mainly related to the morphologies of the humerus, ulna, and the clavicle-interclavicle complex, and thereby indicate different modes of locomotion i.e., swimming styles. The pachypleurosaur and the basal pistosauroid were most likely anguilliform swimmers, whereas Nothosaurus also employed its forelimbs during swimming (paraxial swimming). Taphonomical observations on material of the Winterswijk locality indicate the presence of scavengers, although most disarticulated skeletons were transported by water and decayed and disintegrated in shallow water.

Keywords

Nothosaurus Pistosauroidea Morphology Size and Ontogeny Swimming style Taphonomy 

Kurzfassung

Die Morphologie des postcranial Skelettes von Nothosaurus wird anhand dreier unvollständig erhaltener Skelette von der Fundstelle Winterswijk beschrieben. Zwei der Skelettreste wurden mit diagnostischem Schädelmaterial gefunden und können so unzweifelhaft N. marchicus zugeordnet werden. Soweit erhalten, können die Humeri dem Nothosaurus-Morphotyp II zugeschrieben werden, was die bereits zuvor gezogene Verbindung dieses Humerus Morphotyps mit diesem Taxon bestätigt. Auch mit dieser Studie wird auf das Vorkommen eines weiteren Nothosaurus Taxons im unteren Muschelkalk, oder einen deutlichen geschlechtlichen Dimorphismus, oder aber auf ein breiteres Größenspektrum für N. marchicus hingewiesen. Postcraniale Elemente von Nothosaurus werden mit der Morphologie des basalen Pistosauroiden (cf. Cymatosaurus) anhand publizierter Daten aber auch anhand von Neufunden aus Winterswijk verglichen. Zahlreichen morphologischen Ähnlichkeiten stehen einige wenige Unterschiede gegenüber was die Zuordnung isolierter Knochen (Einzelfunden) erschwert oder gar unmöglich macht. Nur die Kombination von Merkmalen unterschiedlicher Knochen eines Individuums ermöglicht eine genauere taxonomische Zuordnung. Des weiteren wird das ontogenetische Alter der Skelette diskutiert. Morphologische Unterschiede zwischen Nothosaurus, dem basalen Pistosauroiden und dem morphologisch ebenfalls ähnlichen, obwohl kleineren Pachypleurosaurier A. heterodontus betreffen vor allem den Humerus, die Ulna und den Clavicula-Interclavicula-Komplex, was auf Unterschiede in der Lokomotion, also im Schwimmstil, hindeutet. Der Pachypleurosaurier A. heterodontus und der basale Pistosauroide waren höchstwahrscheinlich anguilliforme Schwimmer, wohingegen Nothosaurus bereits seine Vorderarme zur Fortbewegung nutzte was auf paraxiales Schwimmen deutet. Taphonomische Beobachtungen an den Skeletten von marinen Reptilien aus der Fundstelle Winterswijk beweisen die Anwesenheit von Aasfressern. Die meisten Skelette wurden jedoch im Wasser transportiert und zerfielen dann langsam im Flachwasser, wo sie schließlich in unterschiedlicher Erhaltung eingebettet wurden.

Schlüsselwörter

Nothosaurus Pistosauroidea Morphologie Größe und Ontogenie Schwimmstil Taphonomie 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all members of the Muschelkalk Workgroup, especially Henk Oosterink, for their support, and Sibelco Europe MineralsPlus Winterswijk, which operates the Winterswijk Steen-en Kalkgroeve, and its manager Gerard ten Dolle for access to the quarry and the support they provided on their premises. Furthermore we would like to thank the following institutions and individuals for access to the specimens studied in this work: Henk Oosterink, Winterswijk, The Netherlands; Herman Winkelhorst, Aalten, The Netherlands; Jan van den Berg, Schoonhoven, The Netherlands; Wim Berkelder, Winterswijk, The Netherlands; Reinier van Zelst and John de Vos, National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, Leiden, The Netherlands; Daniela Schwarz-Wings, Museum für Naturkunde, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany. Special thanks go out to the following staff members of the Steinmann Institute, University of Bonn: Olaf Dülfer for his outstanding preparation work and Georg Oleschinski for the excellent photographies.

References

  1. Aigner, T. 1985. Storm depositional systems: Dynamic stratigraphy in modern and ancient shallow-marine sequences, 174. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Albers, P.C.H. 2005. A placodontoid jaw fragment from the Lower Muschelkalk of Winterswijk (The Netherlands). PalArch’s Journal Of Vertebrate Palaeontology 3: 33–36. http://www.palarch.nl/2005/07/albers2005/.
  3. Albers, P.C.H. 2011. New Nothosaurus skulls from the Lower Muschelkalk of the western Lower Saxony Basin (Winterswijk, The Netherlands) shed new light on the status of Nothosaurus winterswijkensis. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 90(1): 15–22.Google Scholar
  4. Albers, P.C.H., and O. Rieppel. 2003. A new species of the sauropterygian genus Nothosaurus from the Lower Muschelkalk of Winterswijk, The Netherlands. Journal of Paleontology 77: 738–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baur, G. 1889. Palaeohatteria Credner, and the Proganosauria. American Journal of Science 37: 310–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickelmann, C., and P.M. Sander. 2008. A partial skeleton and isolated humeri of Nothosaurus (Reptilia: Eosauropterygia) from Winterswijk, The Netherlands. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28: 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brochu, C.A. 1996. Closure of neurocentral sutures during crocodilian ontogeny: implications for maturity assessment in fossil archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16: 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caroll, R.L. 1985. Evolutionary constraints in aquatic diapsid reptiles. Special Papers in Palaeontology 33: 145–155.Google Scholar
  9. Castanet, J., H. Francillon-Vieillot, F.J. Meunier, and A. de Ricqlés. 1993. Bone and individual aging. In Bone Growth, vol. 7, ed. B.K. Hall, 245–283. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dülfer, O., and N. Klein. 2006. Studentische Lehrgrabung im Winterswijker Muschelkalk. Der Präparator 52: 90–96.Google Scholar
  11. Edinger, T. 1921. Über Nothosaurus. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Frankfurt a.M: Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University.Google Scholar
  12. Gürich, G.J.E. 1884. Über einige Saurier des oberschlesischen Muschelkalkes. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 36: 125–144.Google Scholar
  13. Haas, G. 1980. Ein Nothosaurier-Schädel aus dem Muschelkalk des Wadi Ramon (Negev, Israel). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 83: 119–125.Google Scholar
  14. Hagdorn, H., and O. Rieppel. 1999. Stratigraphy of marine reptiles in the Triassic of Europe. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie Teil I: 651–678.Google Scholar
  15. Hagdorn, H. and Th. Simon. 2010. Vossenveld-Formation. Litholex (Lithostratigraphische Einheiten Deutschlands) ID 45: 1–6. http://www.bgr.de/app/litholex/gesamt_ausgabe_neu.php?id=45.
  16. Herngreen, G.F.W., J.H.A. van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, and H.W. Oosterink. New geological data (Middle Triassic, Rhaetian-Liassic and Oligocene) of the Winterswijk quarry, the eastern Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 84-4: 409-413.Google Scholar
  17. Hooijer, D.A. 1959. Records of nothosaurians from the Muschelkalk of Winterswijk, Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw 2: 37–39.Google Scholar
  18. Hugi, J. 2011. The long bone histology of Ceresiosaurus (Sauropterygia, Reptilia) in comparison to other eosauropterygians from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio (Switzerland/Italy). Swiss Journal of Palaeontology. doi: 10.1007/s13358-011-0023-6.
  19. Hugi, J., T.M. Scheyer, N. Klein, P.M. Sander, and M.R. Sànchez-Villagra. 2011. Long bone microstructure and life history data of pachypleurosaurids from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio, Switzerland/Italy. Comptes Rendus Palevol 10: 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ji, C., D.-Y. Jiang, O. Rieppel, R. Motani, A. Tintori, and Z.-Y. Sun. 2014. A new specimen of Nothosaurus youngi from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou, China. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 34: 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang, W., M.W. Maisch, W. Hao, Y. Sun, and Z. Sun. 2006. Nothosaurus yangjuanensis n. sp. (Reptilia, Sauropterygia, Nothosauridae) from the middle Anisian (Middle Triassic) of Guizhou, southwestern China. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte 5: 257–276.Google Scholar
  22. Klein, N. 2009. Skull morphology of Anarosaurus heterodontus (Reptilia: Sauropterygia: Pachypleurosauria) from the Lower Muschelkalk of the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, The Netherlands). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29: 665–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein, N. 2010. Long bone histology of Sauropterygia from the Lower Muschelkalk of the Germanic Basin provides unexpected implications for phylogeny. PLoS One 5(7): e11613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klein, N. 2012. Postcranial morphology and growth of the pachypleurosaur Anarosaurus heterodontus (Sauropterygia) from the Lower Muschelkalk of Winterswijk, The Netherlands. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 86: 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klein, N., and P.C.H. Albers. 2009. A new species of the sauropsid reptile Nothosaurus from the Lower Muschelkalk of the Western Germanic Basin, Winterswijk, the Netherlands. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54: 589–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klein, N., and T.M. Scheyer. 2014. A new placodont (Placodontia, Sauropterygia) from the Middle Triassic (early Anisian) of the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, The Netherlands). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 94: 887–902.Google Scholar
  27. Klein, N., and O.J. Sichelschmidt. 2014. Remarkable dorsal ribs with distinct uncinate processes from the early Anisian of the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, The Netherlands). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 271: 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein, N. and E.-M. Griebeler. 2015. Bone histology, microanatomy, and growth of the nothosauroid Simosaurus gaillardorti (Sauropterygia) from the Upper Muschelkalk of southern Germany/Baden-Württemberg. Comptes rendus Palevol (in press).Google Scholar
  29. Klein, N., J. M., Neenan, T.M., Scheyer, and E.-M., Griebeler. 2015a. Growth patterns and life history strategies in Placodontia (Diapsida: Sauropterygia). Royal Society Open Science 2: 140440. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140440.
  30. Klein, N., A. Houssaye, J.M. Neenan, and T.M. Scheyer. 2015b. Long bone histology and microanatomy of Placodontia (Diapsida: Sauropterygia). Contributions to Zoology 84: 59–84.Google Scholar
  31. Koken, E. 1893. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gattung Nothosaurus. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 45: 337–377.Google Scholar
  32. Li, J.-L. 2006. A brief summary of the Triassic marine reptiles of China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 44: 99–108.Google Scholar
  33. Li, J.-L., and O. Rieppel. 2004. A new nothosaur from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 42: 1–12.Google Scholar
  34. Liu, J., S-x Hu, O. Rieppel, D-y Jiang, M.J. Benton, N.P. Kelley, J.C. Aitchison, C-y Zhou, W. Wen, J-y Huang, T. Xie, and T. Lv. 2014. A gigantic nothosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from the Middle Triassic of SW China and its implication for the Triassic biotic recovery. Scientific reports 4: 7142. doi: 10.1038/srep07142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Motani, R. 2009. The Evolution of Marine Reptiles. Evo Edu Outreach 2: 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Münster, G.V. 1834. Vorläufige Nachricht über einige neue Reptilien im Muschelkalke von Baiern. Neues Jahrbuch für die Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefactenkunde 1834: 521–527.Google Scholar
  37. Neenan, J.M., N. Klein, and T.M. Scheyer. 2013. European origin of placodont marine reptiles and the evolution of crushing dentition in Placodontia. Nature Communications 4: 1621. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neenan JM, Li Ch, Rieppel O, Scheyer TM. 2015. The cranial anatomy of Chinese placodonts and the phylogeny of Placodontia (Diapsida: Sauropterygia). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12277.
  39. Nopcsa, F. 1928. Palaeontological notes on reptiles. Geologica Hungaria Serie Palaeontologica 1: 3–84.Google Scholar
  40. Oosterink, H.W. 1986. Winterswijk, Geologie Deel II. De Triasperiode (geologie, mineralen en fossielen). Wetenschappelijke Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging 178: 1–120.Google Scholar
  41. Oosterink, H.W. 2009. The diversity of trace fossils from the Anisian (Middle Triassic) of Winterswijk, the Netherlands. Deposits 20: 8–11.Google Scholar
  42. Oosterink, H.W., and W. Poppe. 1979. Vissen en visresten uit de Onder-Muschelkalk van Winterswijk. Grondboor en Hamer 3: 95–112.Google Scholar
  43. Oosterink, H.W., W. Berkelder, C. De Jong, J. Lankamp, and H. Winkelhorst. 2003. Sauriers uit de Onder-Muschelkalk van Winterswijk. Grondboor en Hamer Staringia 11: 1–144.Google Scholar
  44. Oosterink, H., N. Klein, H. Diependaal, and P. M. Sander. in press. Der Untere Muschelkalk von Winterswijk. In: N. Hauschke and V. Wilde (eds.). Trias—Eine andere Welt. Überarbeitete Ausgabe.Google Scholar
  45. Owen, R. 1860. Palaeontology; or, a systematic summary of extinct animals and their geological remains. Edinburgh: Adam Black and Charles Black.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rieppel, O. 1994. Osteology of Simosaurus gaillardoti and the relationships of stem-group sauropterygia. Fieldiana Geology New Series 28: 1–85.Google Scholar
  47. Rieppel, O. 2000. Sauropterygia I. In Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology, vol. 12A, ed. P. Wellnhofer. München: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. Rieppel, O. 2001. A new species of Nothosaurus (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from the Upper Muschelkalk (Lower Ladinian) of southwestern Germany. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 263: 137–161.Google Scholar
  49. Rieppel, O., and K. Lin. 1995. Pachypleurosaurs (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from the lower Muschelkalk, and a review of the Pachypleurosauroidae. Fieldiana Geology New Series 32: 1–44.Google Scholar
  50. Rieppel, O., and R. Wild. 1996. A revision of the genus Nothosaurus (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from the Germanic Triassic, with comments on the status of Conchiosaurus clavatus. Fieldiana Geology New Series 34: 1–82.Google Scholar
  51. Rieppel, O., J.-M. Mazin, and E. Tchernov. 1997. Speciation along rifting continental margins: a new Nothosaur from the Negev (Israel). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Series IIA 325: 991–997.Google Scholar
  52. Sander, P.M., N. Klein, P.C.H. Albers, C. Bickelmann, and H. Winkelhorst. 2014. Postcranial morphology of a basal Pistosauroidae (Sauropterygia) from the Lower Muschelkalk of Winterswijk, The Netherlands. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 88: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schröder, H. 1914. Wirbeltiere der Rüdersdorfer Trias. Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt Neue Folge 65: 1–98.Google Scholar
  54. Schultze, H.P. 1970. Über Nothosaurus. Neubeschreibung eines Schädels aus dem Keuper. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 51: 211–237.Google Scholar
  55. Shang, Q.-H. 2006. A new species of Nothosaurus from the early Middle Triassic of Guizhou, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 44: 237–249.Google Scholar
  56. Storrs, G.W. 1993. Functio and phylogeny in sauropterygian (Diapsida) evolution. American Journal of Science 293: 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tschanz, K. 1989. Lariosaurus buzzii n. sp. From the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio (Switzerland) with comments on the classification of nothosaurs. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 208: 137–161.Google Scholar
  58. Voeten, D., P.M. Sander, and N. Klein. 2014. Skeletal material from larger Eusauropterygia (Reptilia: Eosauropterygia) with nothosaurian and cymatosaurian affinities from the Lower Muschelkalk of Winterswijk. The Netherlands: Paläontologische Zeitschrift. doi: 10.1007/s12542-014-0250-4.Google Scholar
  59. Volz, W. 1902. Proneusticosaurus, eine neue Sauropterygia Gattung aus dem unstersten Muschelkalk Oberschlesiens. Palaeontographica 49: 121–164.Google Scholar
  60. Weigelt, J. 1930. Rezente Wirbeltierleichen und ihre paläobiologische Bedeutung, 3te ed. Bad Villbel: Berger.Google Scholar
  61. Wild, R., and H. Oosterink. 1984. Tanystropheus (Reptilia, Squamata) aus dem Unteren Muschelkalk von Winterswijk, Holland. Grondboor en Hamer 38: 142–148.Google Scholar
  62. Zhang, Q., W. Wen, S. Hu, M.J. Benton, Ch. Zhou, T. Xie, T. Lu, J. Huang, B. Choo, Z.-Q. Chen, J. Liu, and Q. Zhang. 2014. Nothosaur foraging tracks from the Middle Triassic of southwestern China. Nature Communications 5: 3973. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paläontologische Gesellschaft 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Klein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dennis F. A. E. Voeten
    • 3
  • Jos Lankamp
    • 4
  • Remco Bleeker
    • 5
  • Oliver J. Sichelschmidt
    • 6
  • Marco Liebrand
    • 7
  • Dennis C. Nieweg
    • 8
  • P. Martin Sander
    • 2
  1. 1.Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Division of PaleontologySteinmann Institute, University of BonnBonnGermany
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and Laboratory of OrnithologyPalacký UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic
  4. 4.BorneThe Netherlands
  5. 5.GoorThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Bergisch GladbachGermany
  7. 7.EttenThe Netherlands
  8. 8.Miramar ZeemuseumVledder, DrentheThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations