Paläontologische Zeitschrift

, Volume 88, Issue 4, pp 495–502 | Cite as

A new trap-jaw ant species of the genus Odontomachus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) from the Early Miocene (Burdigalian) of the Czech Republic

  • Torsten Wappler
  • Gennady M. Dlussky
  • Michael S. Engel
  • Jakub Prokop
  • Stanislav Knor
ShortCommunication

Abstract

Odontomachus paleomyagra sp. nov. is described from the Early Miocene of the Most Basin (Czech Republic) on the basis of a single-winged female, representing one of the rare reports of fossil Odontomachini. The new species is separated easily from other trap-jaw ant species groups by differences in mandibular morphology (without denticles on the inner side) and distributional occurrence. The evolutionary and biogeographic history of the Odontomachini is briefly discussed.

Keywords

Ponerinae Odontomachus New species Miocene Most Basin Czech Republic Trap-jaw ants 

Kurzfassung

Aus dem Unter-Miozän im Most Becken (Nord Böhmen; Tschechische Republik) wird erstmals ein Exemplar der Ameisen-Gattung Odontomachus beschrieben und abgebildet. Die neue Art, Odontomachus paleomyagra sp. nov., unterscheidet sich von anderen Angehörigen der Schnappkieferameisen, vor allem durch Unterschiede in der Morphologie der Mandibeln (ohne Zähnchen an der Innenseite) und ihrer ungewöhnliche biogeographischen Verbreitung. Die evolutionäre und biogeographische Geschichte der Odontomachini wird kurz diskutiert.

Schlüsselwörter

Ponerinae Odontomachus Neue Art Miozän Most Becken Tschechien Schnappkieferameisen 

References

  1. Agosti, D., and N.F. Johnson (eds.) 2007. Antbase. World wide web electronic publication, version of May 2005. http://www.antbase.org. Accessed 04 April 2013.
  2. Barden, P., and D.A. Grimaldi. 2012. Rediscovery of the bizarre Cretaceous ant Haidomyrmex Dlussky (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with two new species. American Museum Novitates 3755: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baroni Urbani, C. 1980. Anochetus corayi n. sp., the first fossil Odontomachiti ant. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie) 55: 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, A. 1861. Unititled contribution. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 11: 7–8.Google Scholar
  5. Blakey, R. 2011. Global paleogeography. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/globaltext2.html. Accessed 5 May 2013.
  6. Bolton, B. 2013. An online catalog of the ants of the world. http://antcat.org/catalog/index. Accessed 5 April 2013.
  7. Brown, W.L. 1973. A comparison of the Hylean and Congo-West African rain forest ant faunas. In Tropical forest ecosystems in Africa and South America: a comparative review, ed. B.J. Meggers, E.S. Ayensu, and W.D. Duckworth, 161–185. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, W.L. 1976. Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. VI. Ponerinae, tribe Ponerini, subtribe Odontomachiti. Section A. Introduction, subtribal characters. Genus Odontomachus. Studia Entomologica (NS) 19: 67–171.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, W.L. 1977. A supplement to the world revision of Odontomachus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 84: 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, W.L. 1978. Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. VI. Ponerinae, tribe Ponerini, subtribe Odontomachiti. Section B. Genus Anochetus and bibliography. Studia Entomologica (NS) 20(1–4): 549–638.Google Scholar
  11. de Dalla Torre, C.G. 1893. Catalogus hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Volumen VII: Formicidae (Heterogyna). Lipsiae: Sumptibus Guilelmi Engelmann.Google Scholar
  12. De Andrade, M.L. 1994. Fossil Odontomachiti ants from the Dominican Republic. (Amber Collection Stuttgart: Hymenoptera, Formicidae. VII: Odontomachiti). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie) 199: 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. Dlussky, G.M. 1996. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Burmese amber. Paleontological Journal 30(4): 449–454.Google Scholar
  14. Dlussky, G.M. 2009. Ants (Insecta: Vespida: Formicidae) in the Upper Eocene amber of Central and Eastern Europe. Paleontological Journal 43: 1024–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dlussky, G.M., and S. Wedmann. 2012. The poneromorph ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae: Amblyoponinae, Ectatomminae, Ponerinae) of Grube Messel, Germany: high biodiversity in the Eocene. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 10: 725–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engel, M.S., and D.A. Grimaldi. 2005. Primitive new ants from the Cretaceous amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). American Museum Novitates 3485: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Emery, C., and M.Ch. de Voyage. 1892. Alluaud dans le territoire d’Assinie (Afrique occidentale) en juillet et août 1886. Formicides. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 60: 553–574.Google Scholar
  18. Emery, C. 1911. Hymenoptera. Fam. Formicidae. Subfam. Ponerinae. Genera Insectorum 118: 1–125.Google Scholar
  19. Feitosa, R.M., S. Lacau, W.D. Da Rocha, A.R. Oliveira, and J.H.C. Delabie. 2012. A giant new arboreal species of the ant genus Anochetus from Brazil (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (NS) 48(3-4): 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fikáček, M., J. Hájek, and J. Prokop. 2008. New records of the water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Hydrophilidae) from the central European Oligocene–Miocene deposits, with a confirmation of the generic status of Hydrobiomorpha enspelense Wedmann, 2000. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (NS) 44(2): 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, B.L., and M.A. Smith. 2008. A revision of malagasy species of Anochetus Mayr and Odontomachus Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). PLoS One 3(5): e1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forel, A. 1893. Sur la classification de la famille des formicides, avec remarques synonymiques. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 37: 161–167.Google Scholar
  23. Grimaldi, D.A., and M.S. Engel. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Grimaldi, D.A., D. Agnosti, and J.M. Carpenter. 1997. New and rediscovered primitive ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Cretaceous amber from New Jersey, and their phlogenetic relationships. American Museum Novitates 3208: 1–43.Google Scholar
  25. Gronenberg, W. 1995. The fast mandible strike in the trap-jaw ant Odontomachus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 176(3): 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hölldobler, B., and E.O. Wilson. 1990. The ants. Cambridge: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Iturralde-Vinent, M.A., and R.D.E. MacPhee. 1996. Age and paleogeographical origin of Dominican amber. Science 273(5283): 1850–1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knor, S., M. Skuhravá, T. Wappler, and J. Prokop. 2013. Galls and gall makers on plant leaves from the lower Miocene (Burdigalian) of the Czech Republic: systematic and palaeoecological implications. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 188: 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kvaček, Z. 1998. Bílina: a window on Early Miocene marshland environments. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 101: 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kvaček, Z., M. Böhme, Z. Dvořák, M. Konzalová, K. Mach, J. Prokop, and M. Rajchl. 2004. Early Miocene freshwater and swamp ecosystems of the Most Basin (northern Bohemia) with particular reference to the Bílina mine section (Spodnomiocenní sladkovodní a bažinné ekosystémy mostecké pánve (severní Čechy) se zvláštním zřetelem k profilu dolu Bílina). Journal of the Czech Geological Society 49(1–2): 1–40.Google Scholar
  31. LaPolla, J.S., G.M. Dlussky, and V. Perrichot. 2013. Ants and the fossil record. Annual Review of Entomology 58(1): 609–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latreille, P.A. 1804. Tableau méthodique des insectes. Classe huitième. Insectes, Insecta. Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire Naturelle 24: 129–200.Google Scholar
  33. Latreille, P.A. 1809. Genera crustaceorum et insectorum, secundum ordinem naturalem in familias disposita, iconibus exemplisque plurimis explicata, vol. 4. Paris: Amand Koenig.Google Scholar
  34. Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, A. 1835. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Hyménoptères. Roret: Tome I. Paris.Google Scholar
  35. Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae. Regnum Animale, 10th edn. Lipsiae: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  36. MacKay, W.P. 1991. Anochetus brevidentatus, new species, a second fossil Odontomachiti ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 99(1): 138–140.Google Scholar
  37. Matsumura, S. 1912. Thousand insects of Japan, supplement 4. Tokyo: Keishu-sha.Google Scholar
  38. Mayr, G. 1867. Adnotationes in monographiam formicidarum Indo-Neerlandicarum. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 2(10): 33–118.Google Scholar
  39. McKellar, R.C., J.R.N. Glasier, and M.S. Engel. 2013. A new trap-jawed ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Haidomyrmecini) from Canadian Late Cretaceous amber. The Canadian Entomologist 145: 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ouellette, G.D., B.L. Fisher, and D.J. Girman. 2006. Molecular systematics of basal subfamilies of ants using 28S rRNA (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40(2): 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patek, S.N., J.E. Baio, B.L. Fisher, and A.V. Suarez. 2006. Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 12787–12792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perrichot, V., A. Nel, D. Néraudeau, S. Lacau, and T. Guyot. 2008. New fossil ants in French Cretaceous amber (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften 95(2): 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prokop, J. 2003. Remarks on palaeoenvironmental changes based on reviewed tertiary insect associations from the Krusné hory piedmont basins and the Ceské stredohori Mts in northwestern Bohemia (Czech Republic). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 46((suppl, fossil insects)): 329–344.Google Scholar
  44. Roger, J. 1861. Die Ponera-artigen Ameisen. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift 5: 1–54.Google Scholar
  45. Santos, I.S., M.A. Costa, C.S.F. Mariano, J.H.C. Delabie, V. Andrade-Souza, and J.G. Silva. 2010. A cytogenetic approach to the study of neotropical Odontomachus and Anochetus Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 103(3): 424–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmidt, C.A. 2011. Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic revision of ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Ann Arbor: Proquest, UMI Dissertation Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, F. 1857. Catalogue of the hymenopterous insects collected at Sarawak, Borneo; Mount Ophir, Malacca; and at Singapore, by A. R. Wallace. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 2: 42–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sorger, D.M., and H. Zettel. 2011. On the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Philippine Islands: V. The genus Odontomachus Latreille, 1804. Myrmecological News 14: 141–163.Google Scholar
  49. Spagna, J.C., A.I. Vakis, C.A. Schmidt, S.N. Patek, X. Zhang, N.D. Tsutsui, and A.V. Suarez. 2008. Phylogeny, scaling, and the generation of extreme forces in trap-jaw ants. Journal of Experimental Biology 211(14): 2358–2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torsten Wappler
    • 1
  • Gennady M. Dlussky
    • 2
  • Michael S. Engel
    • 3
  • Jakub Prokop
    • 4
  • Stanislav Knor
    • 4
  1. 1.Section Palaeontology, Steinmann InstituteUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Department of Evolution, Biological FacultyM.V. Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Division of Entomology Natural History Museum, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  4. 4.Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceCharles University in PraguePraha 2Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations