Advertisement

Machinability Study of Duplex Stainless Steel 2205 During Dry Turning

  • Gaurav D. SonawaneEmail author
  • Vikas G. Sargade
Regular Paper
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Duplex stainless steels (DSS) are preferred replacement to austenitic stainless steel because of their higher strength leading to economic benefits. However, poor ductility and thermal conductivity along with high toughness make them difficult to machine. In the present investigation, tool wear, cutting force and surface roughness were evaluated during dry turning of DSS 2205 using tungsten carbide inserts coated with AlTiCrN and AlTiN. High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering technique was used for coating the substrates. Cutting speeds of 100, 140 and 180 m/min; feed of 0.12, 0.15, and 0.18 mm/rev, and a fixed depth of cut of 0.8 mm were chosen as cutting parameters for dry turning. AlTiCrN coating exhibited highest adhesion strength of 110 N compared to 89 N by AlTiN coating. AlTiCrN coated tools exhibited highest tool life of 7840 mm, with least surface roughness of 0.72 µm and cutting force of 255 N. This is attributed to its excellent physical properties such as good adhesion, higher oxidation resistance and thermal stability, compared to AlTiN coated tool. AlTiCrN and AlTiN coated tools exhibited respectively 6-times and 4-times more tool life than uncoated tools. Combination of high speed (180 m/min) and low feed (0.12 mm/rev) resulted in least surface finish. Regression model developed from the experimental data showed closer agreement (95%) between predicted and experimental values of surface roughness.

Keywords

DSS2205 HiPIMS AlTiN AlTiCrN Dry turning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude to CemeCon, Germany for providing timely support for tool coating.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the NEB and Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India for funding this project (Ref: 11/10/2015-NEB (G)/03 Dated 27/09/2017).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest and authors have full control of all the data included in manuscript and authors are agree to allow journal to review their data, if required.

Ethical Standards

The manuscript does not contain any clinical studies or patient data.

References

  1. 1.
    Chiu, L. H., Su, Y. Y., Chen, F. S., & Chang, H. (2010). Microstructure and properties of active screen plasma nitrided duplex stainless steel. Materials and Manufacturing processes,25(5), 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunn, R. N. (1997). Duplex stainless steels: Microstructures, properties and applications. Cambridge: Wood-head Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Selvaraj, D. P., & Chandramohan, P. (2010). Influence of cutting speed, feed rate and bulk texture on the surface finish of nitrogen alloyed duplex stainless steels during dry turning. Engineering,2, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Senthilkumar, K., Senthilkumar, J. S., & Srinivasan, A. (2013). Reducing surface roughness by optimizing the turning parameters. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering,24, 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koyee, R. D., Heisel, U., Eisseler, R., & Schmauder, S. (2015). Modeling and optimization of turning duplex stainless steels. Journal of Manufacturing Processes,3, 36–83.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Królczyk, G., Gajek, M., & Legutko, S. (2013). Effect of the cutting parameters impact on tool life in duplex stainless steel turning process. Tehnicki Vjesnik (Technical News),20(4), 587–592.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krolczyk, G., Nieslony, P., & Legutko, S. (2014). Microhardness and surface integrity in turning process of duplex stainless steel (DSS) for different cutting conditions. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance,23, 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koyee, R. D., Heisel, U., Schmauder, S., & Eisseler, R. (2014). Experimental investigation and multiobjective optimization of turning duplex stainless steels. International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering,1, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalss, W., Reiter, A., Derflinger, V., Gey, C., & Endrino, J. L. (2006). Modern coating in high performance cutting applications. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials,24(5), 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pervaiz, S., Deiab, I., & Darras, B. (2013). Power consumption and tool wear assessment when machining titanium alloys. International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing,14(6), 925–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nomani, J., Pramanik, A., Hilditch, T., & Littlefair, G. (2017). Stagnation zone during the turning of duplex SAF 2205 stainless steels alloy. Materials and Manufacturing Processes,32(13), 1486–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Molybdenum Association. (2014). Practical guidelines for the fabrication of duplex stainless steels (3rd ed.). London: International Molybdenum Association (IMoA).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi, Y. (2019). Effects of cutting speed on surface integrity and fatigue performance of hard machined surfaces. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,20(1), 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kulkarni, A. P., & Sargade, V. G. (2015). Characterization and performance of AlTiN, AlTiCrN, TiN/TiAlN PVD coated carbide tools while turning SS304. Materials and Manufacturing Processes,30, 748–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krolczyk, G., Legutko, S., & Gajek, M. (2013). Predicting the surface roughness in the dry machining of duplex stainless steel (DSS). Metallurgia,52(2), 259–262.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pramanik, A., Basak, A. K., Dixit, A. R., & Chattopadhyaya, S. (2018). Processing of duplex stainless steel by WEDM. Materials and Manufacturing Processes,33(14), 1559–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, N., Chen, Y., & Kong, D. (2018). Wear mechanism analysis and its effects on the cutting performance of PCBN inserts during turning of hardened 42CrMo. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,19(9), 1355–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Galanis, N. I., Manolakos, D. E., & Vaxevanidis, N. M. (2008). Comparison between dry and wet machining of stainless steel. In Proceedings 3rd international conference on manufacturing engineering (ICMEN) (pp. 91–98).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johansson, J. (1999). Ph.D. Thesis. Residual Stresses and Fatigue in a Duplex Stainless Steel. Sweden: Linkoping University.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krolczyk, G. M., Nieslony, A. P., Maruda, R. W., & Wojciechowski, B. S. (2016). Dry cutting effect in turning of a duplex stainless steel as a key factor in clean production. Journal of Cleaner Production,30, 1–12.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stanislav, V. (1998). New development in super-hard coating: The super-hard nanocrystalline-amorphous composite. Thin Solid Films,317, 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bunshah, R. F. (2002). Handbook of hard coatings. New York: William Andrew Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hui-Bo, H., Han, W., Li, H., Li, D., et al. (2014). Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on machinability and wear mechanism of TiAlN coated tools during dry turning. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,15(4), 655–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Celik, Y. H., Kilickap, E., & Guney, M. (2017). Investigation of cutting parameters affecting on tool wear and surface roughness in dry turning of Ti–6Al–4V using CVD and PVD coated tools. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering,39, 2085–2093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jose, F., Martinho, R. P., Martins, C., & Gouveia, R. M. (2019). Machining GX2CrNiMoN26-7-4 DSS alloy: Wear analysis of TiAlN and TiCN/Al2O3/TiN coated carbide tools behaviour in rough end milling operations. Coatings,9(6), 392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chinchanikar, S., & Choudhary, S. K. (2016). Comparative evaluations of nose wear progression and failure modes during hard turning under dry and near-dry cutting conditions. International Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials,18(5–6), 466–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hui-Bo, H., Li, H., Zhang, X., Yue, Q., et al. (2018). Research on the cutting performances and wear mechanisms of TiAlCrN coated tools during dry turning. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00026-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Strnad, P. C. (2012). Novel coating for high performance cutting and dry machining. In 6th edition of interdisciplinarity in engineering international conference (pp. 75–80).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li, Y. M., Yue, Q., Li, H. Y., & He, H. B. (2018). Friction and wear characteristics of 20Cr steel substrate and TiAlN coating under different lubrication conditions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,19(10), 1521–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Diniz, A. E., & Micaroni, R. (2002). Cutting conditions for finish turning process aiming: The use of dry cutting. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,42, 899–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zaharudin, A., & Budin, S. (2019). Influence of cutting speed on coated TiCN cutting tool during turning of AISI 316L stainless steel in dry turning process. In Proceedings in: 1st international conference on industrial and manufacturing engineering (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kondo, M. Y., Pinheiro, C., Marcelo, A., Souza, T. A., & SouzaKondo, V. C. (2019). Cutting parameters influence investigations on cutting consumed power, surface roughness and tool wear during turning of superalloy VAT 32with PVD coated carbide tools using Taguchi method. Material Research Express,1, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab0da8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rajaguru, J., & Arunachalam, N. (2017). Coated tool Performance in dry turning of super duplex stainless steel. In Proceedings in: 45th SME North American manufacturing research conference (Vol. 10, pp. 601–611) NAMRC 45, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Selvaraj, D. P., & Chandrasekar, P. (2018). Experimental investigations of nitrogen alloyed duplex stainless steel in dry milling process. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology,13(2), 321–331.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gutakovskis, V., Bunga, G., & Torims, T. (2010). Stainless steel machining with nanocoated duratomic TM cutting tools. In Proceedings in: 7th international DAAAM baltic conference industrial engineering (pp. 1–6) Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Selvaraj, D. P., Chandramohanb, P., & Mohanraj, M. (2014). Optimization of surface roughness, cutting force and tool wear of nitrogen alloyed duplex stainless steel in a dry turning process using Taguchi method. Measurement,49, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Honess, C. (2006). Importance of surface finish in the design of stainless steel. Rotherham: Swinden Technology Centre.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abhang, L. B., & Hameedullah, M. (2018). Modeling and analysis of tool wear based on cutting force and chip-tool interface temperatures in turning. Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Science,1, 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kumar, P. (2019). A surface roughness predictive model for DSS longitudinal turning operation, chapter 25 (pp. 285–296). Vienna: Daaam International Scientific Book.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang, H. P., Zhang, Q. Y., Ren, Y., Shay, T., & Liu, G. L. (2018). Simulation and experiments on cutting forces and cutting temperature in high speed milling of 300M steel under CMQL and dry conditions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,19(8), 1245–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen, Y., Sun, Y., Lin, H., Zhang, B. (2018) Prediction model of milling surface roughness based on regression analysis (Vol. 83, pp. 557–560).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jebaraj, A. V., Ajaykumar, L., & Deepak, C. R. (2017). Weldability, machinability, and surfacing of commercial duplex stainless steel AISI 2205 for marine application. Journal of Advanced Research,8, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kim, D. H., Zhang, T. F., Shin, J. H., Kang, M. C., & Kim, K. H. (2016). Microstructure and mechanical properties of Cr–Ni–N coatings deposited by HiPIMS. Surface Engineering,32(4), 314–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sonawane, G., & Sargade, V. (2019). Studies on the characterization and machinability of duplex stainless steel 2205 during dry turning. International Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,13(5), 349–353.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Organization, I. S. (1993). Tool Life testing with single point turning tools. ISO 3685 2(11), 1–48.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shanmugarajan, B., & Shrivastava, S. B. (2016). Optimisation of laser welding parameters for welding of P92 material using Taguchi based grey relational analysis. Defence Technology,12(4), 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Abhang, L. B., & Hameedullah, M. (2010). Chip-tool interface temperature prediction model for turning process. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology,2(4), 382–393.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Altun, O., & Boke, Y. E. (2009). Effect of microstructure of EB-PVD thermal barrier coatings on thermal conductivity and methods to reduce thermal conductivity. Archives of Materials Science and Engineering,40(1), 47–52.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Veprek, S. (1998). New development in superhard coatings: The superhard nanocrystalline-amorphous composites. Thin Solid Films,317(1–2), 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kulkarni, A. P., Joshi, G. G., & Sargade, V. G. (2013). Performance of PVD AlTiCrN coating during machining of austenitic stainless steel. Surface Engineering,29(5), 402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Saï, W. B., & Lebrun, J. L. (2003). Influence of finishing by burnishing on surface characteristics. Journal of Material Engineering and Performance,12(1), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bouchnak, T. B., & Germain, G. (2010). High pressure water jet assisted machining of duplex SS: Machinability and tool life. International Journal of Material Forming,3(1), 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological UniversityLonere, RaigadIndia

Personalised recommendations