Post-processing of Laser Additive Manufactured Inconel 718 Using Laser Shock Peening

  • A. N. Jinoop
  • S. Kanmani SubbuEmail author
  • C. P. Paul
  • I. A. Palani
Regular Paper


The components built using new generation feature based design and manufacturing process, called laser additive manufacturing (LAM) is inherited with tensile residual stress due to rapid heating and cooling during material processing. Laser shock peening (LSP) is an advanced surface engineering process that imparts beneficial compressive residual stresses into materials yielding longer product life by increasing the resistance to many surface-related failures, such as wear. LSP is widely used by various industries including aerospace, power generation, chemical processing, etc. to increase the life of engineering components. This paper reports LSP of LAM built Inconel 718 and the parametric study is conducted by varying peak laser power and number of shots at three different levels. Optimum laser power and number of shots derived using grey relational analysis is found to be 170 mW and 7, respectively for maximum hardness and minimum depth of profile. The investigation show that LSP changed the surface morphology and mechanical properties of the LAM built structure. The surface investigation using optical profilometer and Vickers micro-hardness shows a maximum profile depth of 10 μm and hardness of 360 HV. Residual stress measurement indicates compressive residual stress of 214.9–307.9 MPa on the LAM sample surface after LSP. The wear studies show an improvement by a factor of 1.70 for LSP treated LAM samples as compared to that of as-built condition. This study unwrap avenues for using LSP as property enhancement post-processing technique LAM fabricated structures with geometrical complexities.


Laser Additive manufacturing Surface treatment Laser shock peening Parameters Characterization 



The authors are highly obliged to Mr. Mahesh Yadav (Ph.D. Student, IIT Delhi), Mr. Sarath Chandra (Research Scholar, NIT Warangal), Mr. Mani Prabu, Mr. Manikandan and Mr. Akash (Research Scholars, IIT Indore) for their support. The authors would like to thank the support from Dr. Ravikumar N.V, Assistant Professor, IIT Madras for residual stress measurement, Dr. Arockia Kumar, NIT Warangal, Dr. N. Venkaiah, NIT Warangal and Ms. Sushmita Bhartiya and Ms. Rashmi Singh, RRCAT.


  1. 1.
    Yadav, M. J., Jinoop, A. N., Danduk, C., & Kanmani, Subbu S. (2017). Laser shock processing: process physics, parameters, and applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(8), 7921–7930.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salimianrizi, A., Foroozmehr, E., Badrossamay, M., & Farrokhpour, H. (2016). Effect of laser shock peening on surface properties and residual stress of Al6061-T6. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 77, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hfaiedh, N., Peyre, P., Song, H., Popa, I., Ji, V., & Vignal, V. (2015). Finite element analysis of laser shock peening of 2050-T8 aluminum alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 70, 480–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karthik, D., Kalainathan, S., & Swaroop, S. (2015). Surface modification of 17-4 PH stainless steel by laser peening without protective coating process. Surface & Coatings Technology, 278, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jinoop, A. N., Paul, C. P., & Bindra, K. S. (2019). Laser assisted direct energy deposition of Hastelloy-X. Optics Lasers Technology, 109, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiling, Y., Seung, K. M., Bing, Y. L., & Guijun, B. (2017). Effects of heat treatment on microstructures and tensile properties of IN718/TiC nanocomposite fabricated by selective laser melting. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 18(12), 1693–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paul, C. P., Jinoop, A. N., & Bindra, K. S. (2018). Metal additive manufacturing using lasers. In R. Singh & J. P. Davim (Eds.), Applications and Innovations (pp. 37–94). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jinoop, A. N., Kanmani, Subbu S., & Arockia, Kumar R. (2018). Mechanical and microstructural characterisation on direct metal laser sintered Inconel 718. International Journal of Additive and Subtractive Materials Manufacturing, 2, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo, S., He, W., Chen, K., Nie, X., Zhou, L., & Li, Y. (2018). Regain the fatigue strength of laser additive manufactured Ti alloy via laser shock peening. Journal of Alloys Compounds, 750, 626–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nikola, K., Eric, B., Patrice, P., Snežana, C., Nebojša, B., & Roland, E. L. (2017). Tailoring residual stress profile of selective laser melted parts by laser shock peening. Additive Manufacturing, 16, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charles, S. M., Tao, W., Lin, Y., Graham, C., & Yiu-Wing, M. (2002). Laser shock processing and its effects on microstructure and properties of metal alloys: a review. International Journal of Fatigue, 24, 1021–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Umapathi, A., & Swaroop, S. (2018). Deformation of single and multiple laser peened TC6 titanium alloy. Optics & Laser Technology, 100, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abdullahi, K. G., & Mamoun, M. (2014). Laser peening process and its impact on materials properties in comparison with shot peening and ultrasonic impact peening. Materials, 7, 7925–7974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramanujam, R., Muthukrishnan, N., & Raju, R. (2011). Optimization of cutting parameters for turning Al-SiC(10p) MMC using ANOVA and grey relational analysis. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 12(4), 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chinnaiyan, P., & Jeevanantham, A. K. (2014). Multi-objective optimization of single point incremental sheet forming of AA5052 using Taguchi based grey relational analysis coupled with principal component analysis. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15(11), 2309–2316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trdan, U., & Grum, J. (2015). Investigation of corrosion behaviour of aluminium alloy subjected to laser shock peening without a protective coating. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peyre, P., Fabbro, R., Merrien, P., & Lieurade, H. P. (1996). Laser shock processing of aluminium alloys. Application to high cycle fatigue behaviour. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 210, 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, D., Akhtar, S. N., Patel, A. K., Ramkumar, J., & Balani, K. (2015). Tribological performance of laser peened Ti–6Al–4V. Wear, 322, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. N. Jinoop
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Kanmani Subbu
    • 3
    Email author
  • C. P. Paul
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. A. Palani
    • 4
  1. 1.Laser Additive Manufacturing LaboratoryRaja Ramanna Centre for Advanced TechnologyIndoreIndia
  2. 2.Homi Bhabha National InstituteAnushaktinagar, MumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology PalakkadPalakkadIndia
  4. 4.Discipline of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology IndoreIndoreIndia

Personalised recommendations