Design of Laminated Seal in Cryogenic Triple-Offset Butterfly Valve Used in LNG Marine Engine

  • Hyo-Seo Kwak
  • Hansaem Seong
  • Chul KimEmail author
Regular Paper


A cryogenic triple-offset butterfly valve, which is installed in LNG marine engine, controls flow of liquid nitrogen (− 196 °C) to liquefy natural gas (− 163 °C). The existing seal has dual-layer structure composed of rubber and metal seals. The rubber seal is needed to be frequently replaced owing to its low durability, and elasticity of the metal seal decreases in the cryogenic environment, so that leakage of the nitrogen occurs. In order to offer a combination of compressible and resilient materials that form a strong sealing performance in the cryogenic environment (− 196 °C), a new type of seal was devised by laminating muti-layers (graphite and stainless steel). The airtightness of the laminated seal was estimated by comparing contact pressure that occurs on surface of the seal with working pressure. Effects of design parameters in relation to the laminated seal were analyzed to improve sealing performance, and after that a shape of laminated seal to improve operability and airtightness was suggested. Also, the proposed model obtained from FEA was verified through hydraulic and cryogenic leakage tests.


Cryogenic triple-offset butterfly valve Laminated seal Graphite Leakage Contact stress Finite element analysis 



  1. 1.
    Codan, E., Bernasconi, S., & Born, H. (2010). IMO III emission regulation: Impact on the turbo-charging system. Conseil International des Machines A Combustion Congress, 139, 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahn, J. T., Lee, K. C., Lee, K. H., & Han, S. H. (2011). Investigation of the mechanical behavior of a flexible solid metal seal for a cryogenic butterfly valve. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25(9), 2393–2400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarawate, N., Morgan, V., & Weber, D. (2015). Development of laminated seals for stator–stator sealing in gas turbines. ASME turbo expo 2015: Turbine technical conference and exposition, pp. V05CT15A021–V05CT15A021, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsai, C. C., Chang, C. Y., & Tseng, C. H. (2004). Optimal design of metal seated ball valve mechanism. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26(3–4), 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ke, Y., Yao, X., Yang, H., Ma, Y., & Liu, Y. (2017). The compression and friction of tubular rubber seal under the curved surface loading. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 231(1), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ke, Y., Yao, X., Yang, H., & He, Q. (2015). A measuring method of gas leakage along the contact interface of the stripped rubber seals. Measurement, 61, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shin, M. S., Yoon, J. Y., Park, I. W., Lee, S. H., Park, H. Y., & Jung, S. H. (2011). A study on structural analysis of butterfly valve components by pressure testing of the industrial standard. The KSFM Journal of Fluid Machinery, 14(3), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Del Toro, A., Johnson, M. C., & Spall, R. E. (2015). Computational fluid dynamics investigation of butterfly valve performance factors. Journal American Water Works Association, 107(5), E243–E254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang, S., Kim, D. E., Kim, K. K., & Kim, J. O. (2014). Effect analysis of design variables on the disc in a double-eccentric butterfly valve. The Scientific World Journal, Vol. 2014, Article ID 305085.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feyzullahoğlu, E. (2015). Abrasive wear, thermal and viscoelastic behaviors of rubber seal materials used in different working conditions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 229(1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Kan, B., Jin, M., Ding, J., Hua, T., & Yang, G. (2012). Mathematical modeling of the interference of seal pair in triple-offset butterfly valve. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 226(12), 3026–3031.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phull, H. S. (2004). New developments in triple-offset butterfly valves. World Pumps, 2004(456), 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Das, D., Dutta, A. K., & Ray, K. K. (2010). Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: Part I. Microstructure and hardness. Materials Science and Engineering A, 527(9), 2182–2193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nazarian, H., Krol, M., Pawlyta, M., & Vahdat, S. E. (2018). Effect of sub-zero treatment on fatigue strength of aluminum 2024. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 710(5), 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Mechanical Technology, Pusan National UniversityBusanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Convergence TechnologyPusan National UniversityBusanSouth Korea
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringPusan National UniversityBusanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations