Advertisement

Validation of feasibility of two depth sensor-based Microsoft Kinect cameras for human abduction-adduction motion analysis

  • Choong Yeon Kim
  • Jae Soo Hong
  • Keyoung Jin ChunEmail author
Article

Abstract

Kinematic motion analysis using a VICON camera costing about $20,000 and an IMU sensor, valued at about $1,500, are typical. A depth sensor-based Kinect camera, which costs about $200, is easier to use and less expensive than other motion analysis systems. This study assessed the performance of Kinect camera in evaluating kinematic data of a dummy capable of arm abduction-adduction motion to a maximum angle of 60 degrees as well as of seven healthy male adults. Phase difference between the VICON and Kinect cameras at a standing position angle of 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° was 6.5%, 6.8%, 10.8%, 6.1% and 5.5%, respectively which values were revealed a significantly smaller phase difference of Kinect camera than the IMU sensor (p=0.027), and showed that Kinect camera was more effective for motion analysis. Statistical analysis of the correlation between the VICON and Kinect cameras yielded a Pearson coefficient of 0.96, 0.96, 0.84, 0.96, and 0.94, and limit of agreement (LoA) score of 95.0%, 96.4%, 94.7%, 96.0%, and 95.8% at the standing position angle of 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°, respectively. Two kinect cameras have similar motion tracking performance as the VICON camera system at very little cost.

Keywords

Phase difference Pearson’s coefficient Limit of agreement Abduction-adduction Very little cost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Muybridge, E., “The Science of the Horse’s Motions,” Scientific American, Vol. 39, pp. 241, 1878.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johansson, G., “Visual Motion Perception,” Scientific American, Vol. 232, No. 6, pp. 76–88, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aggarwal, J. and Duda, R. O., “Computer Analysis of Moving Polygonal Images,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 100, No. 10, pp. 966–976, 1975.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marr, D. and Nishihara, H. K., “Representation and Recognition of the Spatial Organization of Three-Dimensional Shapes,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 200, No. 1140, pp. 269–294, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrow, H. G., Tenenbaum, J. M., Bolles, R. C., and Wolf, H. C., “Parametric Correspondence and Chamfer Matching: Two New Techniques for Image Matching,” DTIC Document, No. 0704-0188, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hong, Y. and Cheung, C.-K., “Gait and Posture Responses to Backpack Load during Level Walking in Children,” Gait & Posture, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 28–33, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krosshaug, T., Nakamae, A., Boden, B., Engebretsen, L., Smith, G., et al., “Estimating 3D Joint Kinematics from Video Sequences of Running and Cutting Maneuvers-Assessing the Accuracy of Simple Visual Inspection,” Gait & Posture, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 378–385, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bland, J. M. and Altman, D., “Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement,” The Lancet, Vol. 327, No. 8476, pp. 307–310, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myles, P. S. and Cui, J., “I. Using the Bland–Altman Method to Measure Agreement with Repeated Measures,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 309–311, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carstensen, B., Simpson, J., and Gurrin, L. C., “Statistical Models for Assessing Agreement in Method Comparison Studies with Replicate Measurements,” The International Journal of Biostatistics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zimmermann, L., Ebersohl, J. P., Le Hung, F., Berry, J., Baillieu, F., et al., “Airbag Application: A Microsystem Including a Silicon Capacitive Accelerometer, CMOS Switched Capacitor Electronics and True Self-Test Capability,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 190–195, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, K. H., Ko, J. S., Cho, Y.-H., Lee, K., Kwak, B. M., and Park, K., “A Skew-Symmetric Cantilever Accelerometer for Automotive Airbag Applications,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 121–126, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Napolitano, M. A., Borradaile, K. E., Lewis, B. A., Whiteley, J. A., Longval, J. L., et al., “Accelerometer Use in a Physical Activity Intervention Trial,” Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 514–523, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy, S. L., “Review of Physical Activity Measurement using Accelerometers in Older Adults: Considerations for Research Design and Conduct,” Preventive Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 108–114, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adamo, K. B., Prince, S. A., Tricco, A. C., Connor-Gorber, S., and Tremblay, M., “A Comparison of Indirect Versus Direct Measures for Assessing Physical Activity in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review,” International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 2–27, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jimenez, A. R., Seco, F., Prieto, C., and Guevara, J., “A Comparison of Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning Algorithms using a Low-Cost MEMS IMU,” Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing, pp. 37–42, 2009.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hol, J. D., Schony, T. B., and Gustafsson, F., “Relative Pose Calibration of a Spherical Camera and an IMU,” Proc. of 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 21–24, 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiménez, A. R., Seco, F., Prieto, J. C., and Guevara, J., “Indoor Pedestrian Navigation using an INS/EKF Framework for Yaw Drift Reduction and a Foot-Mounted IMU,” Proc. of 7th Workshop on Positioning Navigation and Communication (WPNC), pp. 135–143, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luinge, H. J., Veltink, P. H., and Baten, C. T., “Ambulatory Measurement of Arm Orientation,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 78–85, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menna, F., Remondino, F., Battisti, R., and Nocerino, E., “Geometric Investigation of a Gaming Active Device,” Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 8085, Paper No. 80850G, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shotton, J., Sharp, T., Kipman, A., Fitzgibbon, A., Finocchio, M., et al., “Real-Time Human Pose Recognition in Parts from Single Depth Images,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 116–124, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clark, R. A., Bower, K. J., Mentiplay, B. F., Paterson, K., and Pua, Y.-H., “Concurrent Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Variables,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 46, No. 15, pp. 2722–2725, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vernadakis, N., Derri, V., Tsitskari, E., and Antoniou, P., “The Effect of Xbox Kinect Intervention on Balance Ability for Previously Injured Young Competitive Male Athletes: A Preliminary Study,” Physical Therapy in Sport, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 148–155, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Su, C.-J., Chiang, C.-Y., and Huang, J.-Y., “Kinect-Enabled Homebased Rehabilitation System using Dynamic Time Warping and Fuzzy Logic,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 22, pp. 652–666, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Diest, M., Stegenga, J., Wörtche, H. J., Postema, K., Verkerke, G. J., and Lamoth, C. J., “Suitability of Kinect for Measuring whole Body Movement Patterns during Exergaming,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 2925–2932, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lange, B., Chang, C.-Y., Suma, E., Newman, B., Rizzo, A. S., and Bolas, M., “Development and Evaluation of Low Cost Game-based Balance Rehabilitation Tool using the Microsoft Kinect Sensor,” Proc. of Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1831–1834, 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Choong Yeon Kim
    • 1
  • Jae Soo Hong
    • 1
  • Keyoung Jin Chun
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Advanced Biomedical Engineering Lab.Korea Institute of Industrial TechnologyChungcheongnam-doSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations