Advertisement

Numerical modeling of stacked composite CFRP/Ti machining under different cutting sequence strategies

  • Jinyang XuEmail author
  • Mohamed El Mansori
Article

Abstract

Stacked composite CFRP/Ti is identified as an innovative structural configuration for manufacturing the key aircraft components favoring energy saving in the modern aerospace industry. Machining of this composite-to-metal alliance exhibits the most challenging task in manufacturing community due to the disparate natures of each phase involved and their respective poor machinability. Since the experimental studies are highly cost and time consuming, the numerical approach should be a capable alternative to overcoming the several technical limitations involved. In this research, an original FE model was developed to simulate the complete chip formation process when orthogonal cutting (OC) of hybrid CFRP/Ti stacks. Different constitutive models and failure criteria were implemented into the Abaqus/Explicit code to construct the entire machining behavior of the stacked composite material. The stack model was built to replicate accurately the key physical phenomena activated in the hybrid cutting operation. Special concentration was made on the comparative studies of the effects of different cutting-sequence strategies on the machining responses induced by CFRP/Ti cutting. The numerical results highlighted the significant role of cutting-sequence strategy in affecting the final machined surface morphology and subsurface damage extent, and hence emphasized the importance of selecting reasonable cutting-sequence strategy for hybrid CFRP/Ti machining.

Keywords

Stacked composite Orthogonal cutting FE analysis Cutting-sequence strategy Cutting mechanism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Xu, J., Mkaddem, A., and El Mansori, M., “Recent Advances in Drilling Hybrid FRP/Ti Composite: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Composite Structures, vol. 135, pp. 316–338, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brinksmeier, E., Fangmann, S., and Rentsch, R., “Drilling of Composites and Resulting Surface Integrity,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu, J. and El Mansori, M., “Cutting Modeling using Cohesive Zone Concept of Titanium/CFRP Composite Stacks,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2091–2100, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu, J. and El Mansori, M., “Finite Element Analysis when Orthogonal Cutting of Hybrid Composite CFRP/Ti,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 87, no. 1, Paper no. 012059, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu, J., An, Q., Cai, X., and Chen, M., “Drilling Machinability Evaluation on New Developed High-Strength T800S/250F CFRP Laminates,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1687–1696, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    An, Q., Xu, J., Cai, X., and Chen, M., “Experimental Investigation on Drilling Force and Hole Quality when Drilling of T800S/250F CFRP Laminate,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 797, pp. 155–160, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, J., An, Q., and Chen, M., “A Comparative Evaluation of Polycrystalline Diamond Drills in Drilling High-Strength T800S/ 250F CFRP,” Composite Structures, vol. 117, pp. 71–82, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghidossi, P., El Mansori, M., and Pierron, F., “Edge Machining Effects on the Failure of Polymer Matrix Composite Coupons,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 989–999, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghidossi, P., El Mansori, M., and Pierron, F., “Influence of Specimen Preparation by Machining on the Failure of Polymer Matrix Off-Axis Tensile Coupons,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 1857–1872, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdel-Aal, H., Nouari, M., and El Mansori, M., “Tribo-Energetic Correlation of Tool Thermal Properties to Wear of Wc-Co Inserts in High Speed Dry Machining of Aeronautical Grade Titanium Alloys,” Wear, vol. 266, no. 3, pp. 432–443, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abdel-Aal, H., Nouari, M., and El Mansori, M., “Influence of Thermal Conductivity on Wear When Machining Titanium Alloys,” Tribology International, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 359–372, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu, J., Zheng, X., An, Q., and Chen, M., “Wear Mechanism of Tool in High-speed Milling of Titanium Alloy TC6,” Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1037–1042, 2012.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, Z., An, Q., Xu, J., Chen, M., and Han, S., “Wear Performance of (nc-AlTiN)/(a-Si3N4) Coating and (nc-AlCrN)/(a-Si3N4) Coating in High-Speed Machining of Titanium Alloys under Dry and Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) Conditions,” Wear, vol. 305, no. 1, pp. 249–259, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Z., Xu, J., Han, S., and Chen, M., “A Coupling Method of Response Surfaces (CRSM) for Cutting Parameters Optimization in Machining Titanium Alloy under Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) Condition,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 693–702, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu, J., Liu, Z., An, Q., and Chen, M., “Wear Mechanism of High-Speed Turning Ti-6Al-4V with TiAlN and AlTiN Coated Tools in Dry and MQL Conditions,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 497, pp. 30–34, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Isbilir, O. and Ghassemieh, E., “Comparative Study of Tool Life and Hole Quality in Drilling of CFRP/Titanium Stack using Coated Carbide Drill,” Machining Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 380–409, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramulu, M., Branson, T., and Kim, D., “A Study on the Drilling of Composite and Titanium Stacks,” Composite Structures, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 67–77, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park, K.-H., Beal, A., Kwon, P., and Lantrip, J., “Tool Wear in Drilling of Composite/Titanium Stacks using Carbide and Polycrystalline Diamond Tools,” Wear, vol. 271, no. 11, pp. 2826–2835, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park, K.-H. and Kwon, P., “Wear Characteristic on Bam Coated Carbide Tool in Drilling of Composite/Titanium Stack,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1073–1076, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Santiuste, C., Miguélez, H., and Soldani, X., “Out-of-Plane Failure Mechanisms in LFRP Composite Cutting,” Composite Structures, vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 2706–2713, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hashin, Z. and Rotem, A., “A Fatigue Failure Criterion for Fiber Reinforced Materials,” Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 448–464, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benzeggagh, M. L. and Kenane, M., “Measurement of Mixed-Mode Delamination Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Glass/Epoxy Composites with Mixed-Mode Bending Apparatus,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 439–449, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aymerich, F., Dore, F., and Priolo, P., “Prediction of Impact-Induced Delamination in Cross-Ply Composite Laminates using Cohesive Interface Elements,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 2383–2390, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Savani, E., Pirondi, A., Carta, F., Nogueira, A., and Hombergsmeier, E., “Modelling Delamination of Ti-CFRP Interfaces,” Proc. of 15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, Italy, 24–29 June, 2012.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xi, Y., Bermingham, M., Wang, G., and Dargusch, M., “Finite Element Modeling of Cutting Force and Chip Formation during Thermally Assisted Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy,” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering-Transactions of the ASME, vol. 135, no. 6, Paper no. 061014, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnson, G. R. and Cook, W. H., “A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperatures,” Proc. of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, pp. 541–547, 1983.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lesuer, D. R., “Experimental Investigations of Material Models for Ti-6Al-4V and 2024-T3,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report No. UCRL-ID-134691, 1999.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gente, A., Hoffmeister, H.-W., and Evans, C., “Chip Formation in Machining Ti6Al4V at Extremely High Cutting Speeds,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 49–52, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Umbrello, D., “Finite Element Simulation of Conventional and High Speed Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Iliescu, D., Gehin, D., Iordanoff, I., Girot, F., and Gutiérrez, M., “A Discrete Element Method for the Simulation of CFRP Cutting,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, X. and Zhang, L., “An Experimental Investigation into the Orthogonal Cutting of Unidirectional Fibre Reinforced Plastics,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1015–1022, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MSMP - EA 7350 LaboratoireArts et Métiers ParisTechChâlons-en-ChampagneFrance

Personalised recommendations