Fabrication and characterization of strain gauge integrated polymeric diaphragm pressure sensors

  • Jongchan Kim
  • Jungchul Lee
  • Bumkyoo ChoiEmail author


We demonstrated a simple fabrication of polymeric diaphragm pressure sensors by embedding a commercial thin-film strain gauge in a polymeric diaphragm. Two different polymer materials, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), were employed for fabrication. Performance of pressure sensors fabricated with two different polymers including sensitivity, linearity, and long-term stability was thoroughly compared using a characterization setup operating in either compressed air or water. Pressure sensitivities were similar for air and water environments regardless of the polymer material. However, the sensitivity and resolution of PET pressure sensors were about 2.5 times better than those of PDMS pressure sensors. Moreover, significant degradation of PDMS pressure sensors was observed over time while PET pressure sensors exhibited good stability in water. Overall, PET is better suited for making liquid pressure sensors than PDMS.


Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) Polymeric diaphragm pressure sensor Strain gauge 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Langer, R. and Tirrell, D. A., “Designing materials for biology and medicine,” Nature, Vol. 428, No. 6982, pp. 487–492, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitesides, G. M., “The origins and the future of microfluidics,” Nature, Vol. 442, No. 7101, pp. 368–373, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benz, D., Botzelmann, T., Kuck, H., and Warkentin, D., “On low cost inclination sensors made from selectively metallized polymer,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 123–24, No. pp. 18–22, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, M. S., Shin, H. J., and Park, Y. K., “Design concept of highperformance flexible tactile sensors with a robust structure,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 11, pp. 1941–1947, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eberhardt, W., Gerhäußer, T., Giousouf, M., Kück, H., Mohr, R., and Warkentin, D., “Innovative concept for the fabrication of micromechanical sensor and actuator devices using selectively metallized polymers,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 97–98, pp. 473–477, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lim, H. C., Schulkin, B., Pulickal, M. J., Liu, S., Petrova, R., Thomas, G., Wagner, S., Sidhu, K., and Federici, J. F., “Flexible membrane pressure sensor,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 119, No. 2, pp. 332–335, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hill, G. C., Melamud, R., Declercq, F. E., Davenport, A. A., Chan, I. H., and Hartwell, P.G. et al., “Su-8 MEMS fabry-perot pressure sensor,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 138, No. 1, pp. 52–62, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mannsfeld, S. C. B., Tee, B. C. K., Stoltenberg, R. M., Chen, C. V. H. H., Barman, S., and Muir, B. V. O. et al., “Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers,” Nat Mater, Vol. 9, No. 10, pp. 859–864, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hasenkamp, W., Forchelet, D., Pataky, K., Villard, J., Van Lintel, H., and Bertsch, A. et al., “Polyimide/SU-8 catheter-tip MEMS gauge pressure sensor,” Biomed Microdevices, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 819–828, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, C. Y., Wu, P. M., Shutter, L. A., and Narayan, R. K., “Dual-mode operation of flexible piezoelectric polymer diaphragm for intracranial pressure measurement,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 96, No. 5, 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krassow, H., Campabadal, F., and Lora-Tamayo, E., “Wafer level packaging of silicon pressure sensors,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 82, No. 1–3, pp. 229–233, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cibula, E. and Donlagic, D., “Miniature fiber-optic pressure sensor with a polymer diaphragm,” Applied Optics, Vol. 44, No. 14, pp. 2736–2744, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ko, H. S., Liu, C. W., and Gau, C., “Novel fabrication of a pressure sensor with polymer material and evaluation of its performance,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 1640–1648, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, D. W. and Choi, Y. S., “A novel pressure sensor with a PDMS diaphragm,” Microelectronic Engineering, Vol. 85, No. 5–6, pp. 1054–1058, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ha, D., Vries, W. N., John, S. W., Irazoqui, P. P., and Chappell, W. J., “Polymer-based miniature flexible capacitive pressure sensor for intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring inside a mouse eye,” Biomed Microdevices, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 207–215, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang, A., Lin, J., Ji, X., Wang, W., Li, H., Zhang, C., and Han, T., “A high-sensitivity pressure sensor based on surface transverse wave,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 187, pp. 141–146, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Senturia, S. D., “Microsystem design,” Kluwer academic publishers Boston, pp. 469–494, 2001.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Metz, S., Van de Ven, W., Potreck, J., Mulder, M., and Wessling, M., “Transport of water vapor and inert gas mixtures through highly selective and highly permeable polymer membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 251, No. 1, pp. 29–41, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSogang UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations