Performance of honed surface profiles to artificial hip joints: An experimental investigation

  • Dipankar Choudhury
  • Robert Walker
  • Taposh Roy
  • Sweety Paul
  • Rajshree Mootanah
Article

Abstract

Surface texture technique increases the tribological capability and performance of bearing surfaces. This technology has a number of applications, including car engines and golf balls. However, the use of texture surface in artificial hip joints has not been adequately explored. The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of plateau honed surfaces on the tribological performance of metal-on-metal hip joints. Four sets of different plateau honed surfaces and a set of non-textured surface were investigated on a friction simulator with a lubricant having similar viscosity of pseudo-synovial fluid. The results showed 50% and 38% reductions in static and dynamic friction coefficient, respectively, for a honed surface (honed surface 3) compared with those of a non-textured surface after 1 million cycles. There was a number of wear signs, including adhesive and fatigue wear in all of the experimental surfaces. Nevertheless, the wear signs in the honed surface 3 were minor. Lubrication film thickness was thicker, and third body abrasive wear assumed to reduce in the honed surface since wear debris removed through honed channel. Therefore, the performance of a well-designed plateau-honed surface is significant in tribological aspects of metal-on-metal hip joints.

Keywords

Honed Texture surface Friction Hydrodynamic Metal-on-metal Hip joints 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    National Joint Registry, “National Joint Registry for England and Wales, 7th Annual Report 2010,” http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/portals/0/njr%207th%20annual%20report%202010.pdf (Accessed 05 Jan, 2013)
  2. 2.
    Bozic, K. J., Ong, K., Lau, E., Kurtz, S. M., Vail, T. P., Rubash, H. E., and Berry, D. J., “Risk of Complication and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Medicare Patients with Different Bearing Surfaces,” Clin Orthop Relat Res, Vol. 468, pp. 2357–2362, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Macfarlane, J., “10,000 hip replacement patients told their operations may need to be reversed after receiving faulty implants,” in Daily Mail online: London, UK, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith, A. J., Dieppe, P., Porter, M., and Blom, A. W., “Risk of cancer in first seven years after metal-on-metal hip replacement compared with other bearings and general population: linkage study between the National Joint Registry of England and Wales and hospital episode statistics,” Brit Med J, Vol. 344, pp. 1–1, 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mäkelä, K. T., Eskelinen, A., Pulkkinen, P., Paavolainen, P., and Remes, V., “Results of 3,668 primary total hip replacements for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years,” Acta orthopaedica, Vol. 82, No. 5, pp. 521–529, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jhurani, S. M. and Fred Higgs, C., “An elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) model of wear particle migration in an artificial hip joint,” Tribol Int, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1326–1338, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W Puhl, S. K., “Which factors influence the long term outcome of total hip replacement? In: C. Rieker, S. Oberholzer, W. Urs (eds),” World Tribology Forum in Arthroplasty. Hans Huber, Bern, pp. 35–47, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katti, K. S., “Biomaterials in total joint replacement,” Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 133–142, 2004.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dowson, D., Hardaker, C., Flett, M., and Isaac, H. G., “Hip Joint Simulator Study of the Performance of Metal-on-Metal Joints, Part I: The Role of Materials. 19,” J Arthroplasty, Vol. 19, pp. 118–123, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dowson, D., Hardaker, C., Flett, M., and Isaac, G. H., “A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design,” J Arthroplasty, Vol. 19, No. 8, Suppl 3, pp. 124–130, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verheyen, C. C. P. M. and Verhaar, J. A. N., “Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements,” J Bone Joint Surg Br, Vol. 93, pp. 298–306, 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gandhe, A. and Grover, M., “(i) Head size, does it matter?,” Current Orthopedics, pp. 155–164, Vol. 22, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, W., Jiang, L., Zhou, C. X., and Wang, X. L., “The lubricant retaining effect of micro-dimples on the sliding surface of PDMS,” Tribol Int, Vol. 52, pp. 87–93, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krupka, I., Hartl, M., Zimmerman, M., Houska, P., and Jang, S., “Effect of surface texturing on elastohydrodynamically lubricated contact under transient speed conditions,” Tribol Int, Vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 1144–1150, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mezghani, S., Demirci, I., Zahouani, H., and Mansori, M. E., “The effect of groove texture patterns on piston-ring pack friction,” Precis Eng, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 210–217, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pawlus, P., Cieslak, T., and Mathia, T., “The study of cylinder liner plateau honing process,” J Mater Process Tech, Vol. 209, No. 20, pp. 6078–6086, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gao, L., Yang, P., Dymond, I., Fisher, J., and Jin, Z., “Effect of surface texturing on the elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip implants,” Tribol Int, Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 1851, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ito, H., Kaneda, K., Yusta, T., Nishimura, I., Yasuda, K., and Matsuno, T., “Reduction of polyethylene wear by concave dimples on the frictional surface in artificial hip joints,” J Arthroplasty, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 332–338, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sawanoa, H., Warisawab, S., and Ishiharab, S., “Study on long life of artificial joints by investigating optimal sliding surface geometry for improvement in wear resistance,” Precis Eng, Vol. 33, pp. 492–498, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Bergmann, G., Deuretzbacher, G., Hellerc, M., Graichen, F., Rohlmann, A., Strauss, J., and Duda, G. N., “Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities,” J Biomech, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 859–871, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oliveiraa, A. L. L., Limaa, R. G., Cuevab, E. G., and Queirozc, R. D., “Comparative analysis of surface wear from total hip prostheses tested on a mechanical simulator according to standards ISO 14242-1 and ISO 14242-3,” Wear, Vol. 271, pp. 2340–2345, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jebens, E. H., and Eileen, M. M. J., “On the Viscosity and Ph of synovial fluid and the Ph of blood,” The journal of bone and joint surgery, Vol. 41-B, No. 2, pp. 388–400, 1959.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Larkin, G. J., Lowe, D. O. G., and Sturrock, D. R., “The correlation of clinical assessment of synovial fluid with its measure viscosity,” BRIT J RHEUMATOL, Vol. 23, pp. 195–197, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pawlak, Z., Kotynska, J., Figaszewski, Z. A., Oloyede, A., Gadomski, A., and Gudaniec, A., “Impact of the charge density of phospholipid bilayers on lubrication of articular cartilage surfaces,” Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 47–51, 2007.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dimkovski, Z., “Characterization of a cylinder liner surface by roughness parameter analysis,” Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden, 2006.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stachowiak, G. W. and Batchelor, A. W., “Engineering Tribology,” Butterworth-Heinemann Publication, 2nd edn., 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mow, V. C. and Huiskes, R., “Basic Orthopaedics and Mechano-Biology,” William and Wilkins, 3rd edn., 2005.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mattei, L., Puccio, F. D., Piccigallo, B., and Ciulli, E., “Lubrication and wear modelling of artificial hip joints: A review,” Tribol Int, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 532–549, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hu, T., Hu, L., and Dinga, Q., “Effective solution for the tribological problems of Ti-6Al-4V: Combination of laser surface texturing and solid lubricant film,” Surf Coat Tech, Vol. 2006, No. 24, pp. 5060–5066, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dipankar Choudhury
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert Walker
    • 3
  • Taposh Roy
    • 1
  • Sweety Paul
    • 4
  • Rajshree Mootanah
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.Medical Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Science and TechnologyAnglia Ruskin UniversityChelmsfordUK
  4. 4.CePHUniversity of MalayaKuala Lumpurmalaysia

Personalised recommendations