Assessment of running safety of railway vehicles using multibody dynamics

Article

Abstract

An analysis model for multibody systems was developed to assess the running safety of the Saemaeul train passing through curves. Sensitivity analyses based on the variation of parameters related to derailments were conducted using this model and the ADAMS/Rail software package. These analyses showed that the derailment coefficient and the unload ratio of the right wheel were higher than that of the left wheel at low speed, but lower at high speed. The derailment coefficient and the unload ratio increased as the curve radius decreased. The derailment coefficient increased but there was no change in the unload ratio as the length of transition curves increased. The derailment coefficient and the unload rate increased in proportion to the increase in track cant.

Keywords

Railway Vehicle Multibody dynamics Running safety Derailment coefficient 

References

  1. 1.
    Bhatti, M. H. and Garg, V. K., “A Review of Railway Vehicle Performance and Design Criteria,” Int. J. Vehicle Design, Vol. 5, No. 1–2, pp. 232–254, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wickens, A. H., “The Dynamics of Railway Vehicles-from Stephenson to Carter,” Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 212, No. 3, pp. 209–217, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilchrist, A. O., “The Long Road to Solution of the Railway Hunting and Curving Problems,” Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 212, No. 3, pp. 219–226, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, H. Y. and Yu, D. L., “Influence of Semi-Active Suspension on Running Safety of Vehicles,” International Journal of Railway, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 147–151, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsudaira, T., “Dynamics of High Speed Rolling Stock,” Japanese National Railways RTRI Quarterly Reports, Special Issue, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weinstock, H., “Wheel Climb Derailment Criteria for Evaluation of Rail Vehicle Safety,” ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Paper No. 84-WA/RT-1, pp. 1–7, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilchrist, A. O. and Brickle, B. V., “A Re-examination of the Proneness to Derailment of a Railway Wheelset,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 131–141, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ham, Y. S., Lee, D. H., Kwon, S. J., You, W. H. and Oh, T. Y., “Continuous Measurement of Interaction Forces between Wheel and Rail,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 35–39, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takai, H., Uchida, M., Muramatsu, H. and Ishida, H., “Derailment Safety Evaluation using Analytic Equations,” Quarterly Report of RTRI, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 119–124, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park, S. H., Kim, J. S. and Choi, J. J., “Reference Slip Ratio Generation and Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Railway Rolling Stocks,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 39–44, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ham, Y. S., “Measuring and Analysis of Derailment Coefficients of Swing Motion Bogie for Railway Freight Car,” Proceedings of the KSPE Autumn Conference, pp. 130–133, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagase, N., Wakabayashi, Y. and Sakahara, H., “A Study of the Phenomenon of Wheel Climb Derailment: Results of Basic Experiments using Model Bogies,” Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 216, No. 4, pp. 237–247, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ishida, H. and Matsuo, M., “Safety Criteria for Evaluation of the Railway Vehicle Derailment,” Quarterly Report of RTRI, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 18–25, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miyamoto, M., “Mechanism of Derailments Phenomena with Railway Vehicle,” Quarterly Report of RTRI, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 147–155, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishida, H., Miyamoto, T., Maebashi, E., Doi, H., Iida, K. and Furukawa, A., “Safety Assessment for Flange Climb Derailment of Trains Running at Low Speeds on Sharp Curves,” Quarterly Report of RTRI, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 65–71, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mechanical Dynamics, “ADAMS/Rail User’s Guide,” 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ham, Y. S., “Study on the anti-vibration of the rolling stock,” Korea Railroad Research Institute, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Korail, “List of Main Components of PMC Car,” 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rolling Stocks SystemSeoul National University of TechnologySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations