Influence of Heat Treatment on High-Cycle Fatigue and Fracture Behaviors of Piston Aluminum Alloy Under Fully-Reversed Cyclic Bending

  • Saeid Rezanezhad
  • Mohammad AzadiEmail author
  • Mahboobeh Azadi


In the present article, the influence of the heat treatment on high-cycle fatigue and fracture behaviors of piston aluminum–silicon alloys was studied. For this objective, standard samples were tested under fully-reversed cyclic bending by a rotary fatigue machine and then, fracture behaviors were investigated by the field emission scanning electron microscopy. Before experiments, two heat treatments were performed on as-cast aluminum specimens, including a cooling process on samples after casting and the T6 treatment (solutioning for 5 h at 500 °C, quenching and ageing for 9 h at 180 °C). Obtained results showed that the heat treatment changed the distribution and the size and of silicon phases in the aluminum matrix and increased the hardness, significantly. In addition, the high-cycle fatigue lifetime increased by the heat treatment, surprisingly as 2146% and 411%, at the highest stress level and the lowest stress level, respectively. This enhancement was more than the improvement by cooling samples after casting. Observing cleavage and quasi-cleavage marks on the specimen fracture surfaces was the reason for the brittle fracture behavior. Besides, cleavage planes were smaller in heat treated samples, with shorter micro-cracks or lower crack densities, which affected the fatigue lifetime of the material.

Graphic Abstract


Heat treatment effect Aluminum–silicon alloy Engine piston High-cycle fatigue Fracture behavior 



Authors would tend to thank Motorsazi Pooya Neyestanak (MPN) Company, in Isfahan, Iran for their financial supports, in addition to provide raw materials and to perform the casting process.


  1. 1.
    M. Azadi, Effects of strain rate and mean strain on cyclic behavior of aluminum alloys under isothermal and thermo-mechanical fatigue loadings. Int. J. Fatigue 47, 148–153 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Azadi, G.H. Farrahi, G. Winter, W. Eichlseder, The effect of various parameters on out-of-phase thermo-mechanical fatigue lifetime of A356.0 cast aluminum alloy. Int. J. Eng. Trans. C Asp. 26(12), 1459–1468 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Azadi, G. Winter, G.H. Farrahi, W. Eichlseder, Comparison between isothermal and non-isothermal fatigue behaviors in cast aluminum–silicon–magnesium alloy. Strength Mater. 47(6), 840–848 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F.S. Silva, Fatigue on engine pistons—a compendium of case studies. Eng. Fail. Anal. 13, 480–492 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.J. Caton, J.W. Jones, J.E. Allison, The influence of heat treatment and solidification time on the behavior of small-fatigue-cracks in a cast aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 314, 81–85 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.M. Boileau, J.E. Allison, The effect of solidification time and heat treatment on the fatigue properties of a cast 319 aluminum alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 34, 1807–1820 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Sadeler, Y. Totik, M. Gavgali, I. Kaymaz, Improvements of fatigue behavior in 2014 Al alloy by solution heat treating and age-hardening. Mater. Des. 25, 439–445 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.N. Desmukha, R.K. Pandey, A. Mukhopadhyay, Effect of aging treatments on the kinetics of fatigue crack growth in 7010 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 435–436, 318–326 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Firouzdor, M. Rajabi, E. Nejati, F. Khomamizadeh, Effect of microstructural constituents on the thermal fatigue life of A319 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 454–455, 528–535 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.A. Siddiqui, S.A. Abdul-Wahab, T. Pervez, Effect of aging time and aging temperature on fatigue and fracture behavior of 6063 aluminum alloy under seawater influence. Mater. Des. 29, 70–79 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Hornqvist, B. Karlsson, Influence of heat treatment on the cyclic deformation properties of aluminum alloy AA7030. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 479, 345–355 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Takahashia, K. Sasakib, Low cycle thermal fatigue of aluminum alloy cylinder head in consideration of changing metrology microstructure. Proc. Eng. 2, 767–776 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. May, M.A. Belouchrani, S. Taharboucht, A. Boudras, Influence of heat treatment on the fatigue behavior of two aluminum alloys 2024 and 2024 plated. Proc. Eng. 2, 1795–1804 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Azadi, M.M. Shirazabad, Heat treatment effect on thermo-mechanical fatigue and low cycle fatigue behaviors of A356.0 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 45, 279–285 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.K. Shaha, F. Czerwinski, W. Kasprzak, J. Friedman, D.L. Chen, Effect of Mn and heat treatment on improvements in static strength and low-cycle fatigue life of an Al–Si–Cu–Mg alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 657, 441–452 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Wang, J.C. Pang, S.X. Li, Z.F. Zhang, Low-cycle fatigue properties and life prediction of Al–Si piston alloy at elevated temperature. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 704, 480–492 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Khisheh, K. Khalili, M. Azadi, V. Zaker Hendoabadi, Heat treatment effect on microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behavior of cylinder head aluminum–silicon–copper alloy. J. Engine Res. 50, 55–65 (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Zhang, H. Zhu, H. Liao, Y. Cheng, Z. Hu, X. Zeng, Effect of heat treatments on fatigue property of selective laser melting AlSi10Mg. Int. J. Fatigue 116, 513–522 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Haskel, G.O. Verran, R. Barbieri, Rotating and bending fatigue behavior of A356 aluminum alloy: effects of strontium addition and T6 heat treatment. Int. J. Fatigue 114, 1–10 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Azadi, S. Rezanezhad, M. Zolfaghari, M. Azadi, Effects of various ageing heat treatments on microstructural features and hardness of piston aluminum alloy. Int. J. Eng. Trans. A 32(1), 92–98 (2019)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahle Company, Pistons and Engine Testing (Springer, Berlin, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Zeren, The effect of heat-treatment on aluminum-based piston alloys. Mater. Des. 28, 2511–2517 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Metallic materials—rotating bar bending fatigue testing, Standard No. ISO-1143, ISO International Standard (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.J. Khameneh, M. Azadi, Evaluation of high-cycle bending fatigue and fracture behaviors in EN-GJS700-2 ductile cast iron of crankshafts. Eng. Fail. Anal. 85, 189–200 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T.O. Mbuy, I. Sinclair, A.J. Moffat, P.A.S. Reed, Micro-mechanisms of fatigue crack growth in cast aluminum piston alloys. Int. J. Fatigue 42, 227–237 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Azadi, M. Zolfaghari, S. Rezanezhad, M. Azadi, Effects of SiO2 nano-particles on tribological and mechanical properties of aluminum matrix composites by different dispersion methods. Appl. Phys. A 124(5), 377 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Zeren, E. Karakulak, S. Gumus, Influence of Cu addition on microstructure and hardness of near-eutectic Al–Si–xCu-alloys. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 21(8), 1698–1702 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Zhu, Z. Jian, G. Yang, Y. Zhou, Effects of T6 heat treatment on the microstructure, tensile properties, and fracture behavior of the modified A356 alloy. Mater. Des. 36, 243–249 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L.Y. Pio, Effect of T6 heat treatment on the mechanical properties of gravity die cast A356 aluminum alloy. J. Appl. Sci. 11(11), 2048–2052 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Ogris, A. Wahlen, H. Luechinger, P.J. Uggowitzer, On the silicon sheroidization in Al–Si alloys. J. Light Met. 2, 263–269 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D.L. Zhang, L.H. Zheng, D.H. StJohn, Effect of a short solution treatment time on microstructure and mechanical properties of modified Al–7wt.%Si–0.3wt.%Mg alloy. J. Light Met. 2, 27–36 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. Zhang, J. Zhang, B. Li, W. Cai, Double-stage hardening behavior and fracture characteristics of a heavily alloyed Al–Si piston alloy during low-cycle fatigue loading. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 561, 26–33 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    ASM Handbook, Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloy and Special Purposed Materials, vol. 2 (ASM International, Almere, 1992)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Liu, Q. Zhang, Z. Zue, Y. Xiong, F. Ren, A. Volinsky, Microstructure evolution of Al–12Si–CuNiMg alloy under high temperature low cycle fatigue. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 574, 186–190 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A.J. Moffat, S. Barnes, B.G. Mellor, P.A.S. Reed, The effect of silicon content on long crack fatigue behavior of aluminum–silicon piston alloys at elevated temperature. Int. J. Fatigue 27(10–11), 1564–1570 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    E. Rincon, H.F. Lopez, M.M. Cisneros, H. Mancha, M.A. Cisneros, Effect of temperature on the tensile properties of an as-cast aluminum alloy A319. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 452–453, 682–687 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringSemnan UniversitySemnanIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Material and Metallurgical EngineeringSemnan UniversitySemnanIran

Personalised recommendations