Effects of the Surface Contact on the Uncertainty in Indentation Yield Strength: Surface Roughness and Angular Misalignment
- 11 Downloads
We suggest a method for accurately estimating the uncertainty of indentation yield strength determined from the modified Meyer relation as a mathematical function of the measurement, taking into account Type A and Type B uncertainty. Using this method, we quantitatively compared the expanded uncertainty level of the yield strength as measured by instrumented indentation testing (IIT) and uniaxial tensile testing, and propose a dominant measurand that affects the final expanded uncertainty of the indentation yield strength. To interpret the difference in uncertainty between IIT and uniaxial tensile testing, we investigated the effect of the major sources of uncertainty in the IIT system: sample surface roughness and angular misalignment between the surface normal of the sample and the symmetric axis of the indenter. The surface roughness was controlled using 400-, 1000- and 2000-grit paper and the misalignment angle ranged over 0°, 1° and 2°. Acceptable surface roughness and standard uncertainty of misalignment angle are proposed that give the IIT similar uncertainty to uniaxial tensile testing.
KeywordsIndentation Yield strength Metals Uncertainty Spherical indenter
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1I1A3A01054545) and the Ministry of Science and ICT (No. NRF-2015R1A5A1037627).
- 7.ASTM E8/E8M-16a, Standard Test Method for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (American Standard for Testing of Materials, Philadelphia, 2016)Google Scholar
- 8.D. Tabor, The Hardness of Metals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951), pp. 19–94Google Scholar
- 10.E. Meyer, Phys. Z. 9, 66 (1908)Google Scholar
- 11.ISO/IEC GUIDE 98-3, Uncertainty of Measurement-Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2008)Google Scholar
- 13.ISO/FDIS 14577-1, Metallic Materials-Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters—Part 1: Test method (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2002)Google Scholar
- 14.R.A. George, S. Dinda, A.S. Kasper, Met. Prog. 109, 30 (1976)Google Scholar
- 15.T.M. Adams, A2LA Guide for the estimation of measurement uncertainty in testing, Chap. 3 (The American Association for Laboratory Accreditation, Frederick, 2002)Google Scholar
- 16.C.J. Chieh, Linear regression: making sense of a six sigma tool (2008). https://www.isixsigma.com/tools-templates/regression/linear-regression-making-sense-six-sigma-tool/. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
- 19.ASTM E2546-15, Standard Practice for Instrumented Indentation Testing (American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, 2015)Google Scholar
- 20.G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy (McGraw-Hill Book Company, London, 1988), pp. 332–334Google Scholar
- 21.Y. Xia, Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, 2014Google Scholar