Advertisement

Metals and Materials International

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 343–352 | Cite as

Microstructural Degradation and Creep Fracture Behavior of Conventionally and Thermomechanically Treated 9% Chromium Heat Resistant Steel

  • Javier VivasEmail author
  • Carlos Capdevila
  • Eberhard Altstadt
  • Mario Houska
  • Ilchat Sabirov
  • David San-Martín
Article

Abstract

The microstructural degradation and the creep fracture behavior of conventionally and thermomechanically treated Grade 91 steel were investigated after performing small punch creep tests. A remarkable reduction in creep ductility was observed for the samples thermomechanically treated in comparison to those conventionally treated under the tested conditions of load (200 N) and temperature (700 °C). A change in the fracture mechanism from a ductile transgranular fracture to a brittle intergranular fracture was observed when changing from the conventionally treated to the thermomechanically treated processing condition, leading to this drop in creep ductility. The change in the fracture mechanism was associated to the localized concentration of creep deformation, close to coarse M23C6 carbides, at the vicinity of prior austenite grain boundaries (PAGB) in the thermomechanically treated samples. The preferential recovery experienced at the vicinity of PAGB produced the loss of the lath structure and the coarsening of the M23C6 precipitates. The electron microscopy images provided suggest that the creep cavities nucleate in these weak recovered areas, associated to the presence of coarse M23C6. After the coalescence of the cavities the propagation of the cracks was facilitated by the large prior austenite grain size produced during the austenitization which favors the propagation of the cracks along grain boundaries triggering the intergranular brittle fracture. This fracture mechanism limits the potential use of the proposed thermomechanical processing routes.

Keywords

Creep resistant steels Thermomechanical treatment Creep fracture behavior Microstructural degradation Small punch creep tests Ausforming 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge financial support to Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) through in the form of a Coordinate Project (MAT2016-80875-C3-1-R). Authors also would like to acknowledge financial support to Comunidad de Madrid through DIMMAT-CM_S2013/MIT-2775 project. The authors are grateful for the dilatometer tests by Phase Transformation laboratory. J.Vivas acknowledges financial support in the form of a FPI Grant BES-2014-069863. This work contributes to the Joint Programme on Nuclear Materials (JPNM) of the European Energy Research Alliance (EERA).

References

  1. 1.
    R.L. Klueh, D.S. Gelles, S. Jitsukawa, A. Kimura, G.R. Odette, B. van der Schaaf, M. Victoria, J. Nucl. Mater. 307–311(Part 1), 455–465 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.L. Klueh, K. Ehrlich, F. Abe, J. Nucl. Mater. 191–194(Part A), 116–124 (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Tan, Y. Katoh, A.A.F. Tavassoli, J. Henry, M. Rieth, H. Sakasegawa, H. Tanigawa, Q. Huang, J. Nucl. Mater. 479, 515–523 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Masuyama, ISIJ Int. 41, 612–625 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.J. Zinkle, G.S. Was, Acta Mater. 61, 735–758 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Abe, T. Horiuchi, M. Taneike, K. Sawada, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 378, 299–303 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Abe, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 387, 565–569 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Abe, Engineering 1, 211–224 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Hollner, B. Fournier, J. Le Pendu, T. Cozzika, I. Tournié, J.C. Brachet, A. Pineau, J. Nucl. Mater. 405, 101–108 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Song, C. Sun, Z. Fan, Y. Chen, R. Zhu, K.Y. Yu, K.T. Hartwig, H. Wang, X. Zhang, Acta Mater. 112, 361–377 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Vivas, C. Celada-Casero, D. San Martín, M. Serrano, E. Urones-Garrote, P. Adeva, M.M Aranda, C. Capdevila, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 47, 1–8 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Tamura, H. Sakasegawa, A. Kohyama, H. Esaka, K. Shinozuka, J. Nucl. Mater. 321, 288–293 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Vivas, C. Capdevila, E. Altstadt, M. Houska, M. Serrano, D. De-Castro, D. San-Martín, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 728, 259–265 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Holdsworth, Mater. High Temp. 34, 97–98 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Parker, Mater. High Temp. 34, 109–120 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E.N. Campitelli, P. Spätig, R. Bonadé, W. Hoffelner, M. Victoria, J. Nucl. Mater. 335, 366–378 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Ruan, P. Spätig, M. Victoria, J. Nucl. Mater. 307, 236–239 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D.J. Brookfield, W. Li, B. Rodgers, J.E. Mottershead, T.K. Hellen, J. Jarvis, R. Lohr, R. Howard-Hildige, A. Carlton, M. Whelan, J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 34, 423–436 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.P. Manahan, A.S. Argon, O.K. Harling, J. Nucl. Mater. 104, 1545–1550 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Altstadt, M. Serrano, M. Houska, A. García-Junceda, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 654, 309–316 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Altstadt, H.E. Ge, V. Kuksenko, M. Serrano, M. Houska, M. Lasan, M. Bruchhausen, J.M. Lapetite, Y. Dai, J. Nucl. Mater. 472, 186–195 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Vivas, C. Capdevila, E. Altstadt, M. Houska, D. San-Martín, Scr. Mater. 153, 14–18 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. De Cock, C. Capdevila, F.G. Caballero, C. García de Andrés, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 519, 9–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Y. Sugino, S. Ukai, B. Leng, N. Oono, S. Hayashi, T. Kaito, S. Ohtsuka, Mater. Trans. 53, 1753–1757 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Vivas, C. Capdevila, J. Jimenez, M. Benito-Alfonso, D. San-Martin, Metals 7, 236 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P.P. Suikkanen, C. Cayron, A.J. DeArdo, L.P. Karjalainen, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 27, 920–930 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Fedoseeva, N. Dudova, R. Kaibyshev, J. Mater. Sci. 52, 2974–2988 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. Rojas, J. Garcia, O. Prat, L. Agudo, C. Carrasco, G. Sauthoff, A.R. Kaysser-Pyzalla, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 1372–1381 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    T.L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications (Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Plesiutschnig, C. Beal, S. Paul, G. Zeiler, C. Sommitsch, Mater. High Temp. 32, 318–322 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Vivas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlos Capdevila
    • 1
  • Eberhard Altstadt
    • 2
  • Mario Houska
    • 2
  • Ilchat Sabirov
    • 3
  • David San-Martín
    • 1
  1. 1.Materalia Research Group, Physical Metallurgy DepartmentCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Metalúrgicas (CENIM-CSIC)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Structural materials and concerningHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR)DresdenGermany
  3. 3.IMDEA Materials InstituteMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations