Modified Johnson-Cook model incorporated with electroplasticity for uniaxial tension under a pulsed electric current
- 95 Downloads
Abstract
An empirical expression describing the electroplastic deformation behavior is suggested based on the Johnson-Cook (JC) model by adding several functions to consider both thermal and athermal electric current effects. Tensile deformation behaviors are carried out for an AZ31 magnesium alloy and an Al-Mg-Si alloy under pulsed electric current at various current densities with a fixed duration of electric current. To describe the flow curves under electric current, a modified JC model is proposed to take the electric current effect into account. Phenomenological descriptions of the adopted parameters in the equation are made. The modified JC model suggested in the present study is capable of describing the tensile deformation behaviors under pulsed electric current reasonably well.
Keywords
alloys deformation mechanical properties tensile test electroplasticityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.O. A. Troitskii, Pisma Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 10, 18 (1969).Google Scholar
- 2.H. Conrad, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 287, 276 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.W. A. Salandro, J. J. Jones, T. A. McNeal, J. T. Roth, S.-T. Hong, and M. T. Smith, J. Manuf. Sci. E.-Trans. ASME 132, 051016 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.C. D. Ross, D. B. Irvin, and J. T. Roth, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 129, 342 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.S.-T. Hong, Y.-H. Jeong, N. Chowdhury, D.-M. Chun, M.-J. Kim, and H. N. Han, CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Techn. 64, 277 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.W. Kim, K.-H. Yeom, N. T. Thien, S.-T. Hong, B.-K. Min, S. I. Oh, et al. CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Techn. 63, 273 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.V. I. Dubinko and V. F. Klepikov, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 72, 1188 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M.-J. Kim, K. Lee, K. H. Oh, I.-S. Choi, S.-T. Hong, H. N. Han, et al. Scripta Mater. 75, 58 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.M.-J. Kim, M.-G. Lee, K. Hariharan, S.-T. Hong, I.-S. Choi, H. N. Han, et al. Int. J. Plasticity 94, 148 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. Magargee, F. Morestin, and J. Cao, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 135, 041003 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. Fan, J. Magargee, P. Hu, and J. Cao, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 574, 218 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.T. J. Kronenberger, D. H. Johnson, and J. T. Roth, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 131, 031003 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.C. Bunget, W. A. Salandro, L. Mears, and J. T. Roth, Trans. N. Amer. Manufac. 38, 647 (2010).Google Scholar
- 14.W. A. Salandro, C. Bunget, and L. Mears, J. Manuf. Sci. E.-Trans. ASME 133, 041008 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.J.-H. Roh, J.-J. Seo, S.-T. Hong, M.-J. Kim, and H. N. Han, Int. J. Plasticity 58, 84 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.K. Hariharan, M.-G. Lee, M.-J. Kim, H. N. Han, D. Kim, and S. Choi, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46, 3043 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Standard E8/E8M-09, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, USA (2011).Google Scholar
- 18.G. R. Johnson and W. H. Cook, Proc. Seventh International Symposium on Ballistic, pp.541–547, The Hague, Netherlands (1983).Google Scholar
- 19.Y. Hu, Y. X. Jin, H. Zheng, Y. Zhou, and J. Shao, Met. Mater. Int. 22, 1015 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.J. Zhao, Z. Jiang, G. Zu, W. Du, X. Zhang, and L. Jiang, Met. Mater. Int. 22, 474 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.I. Ulaciaa, C. P. Salisbury, I. Hurtado, and M. J. Worswick, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 211, 830 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar