Metals and Materials International

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 827–832 | Cite as

Theoretical model for evaluating the threshold reduction in roll bonding of Al/Al2O3/Al laminations

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Roll bonding is the most important stage of the accumulative roll bonding process, which is used to produce high strength composites. The presence of a particle layer at the interface alters the bonding condition and increases the threshold reduction for the commencement of bonding. In this study, the bonding mechanism in presence of powder at the interface is analyzed and a theoretical model is proposed to predict the required threshold reduction in warm roll bonding of commercially pure aluminum sheets as a function of amount of alumina particles at the interface. The model considers the rolling parameters and the effect of amount and size of particles by defining some constants, which are obtained by experiment. It is shown that the measured values of the threshold reduction are very well predicted by the modeling results.

Key words

composites bonding rolling interfaces scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Lu, K. Tieu, and D. Wexler, J. Mater Process. Technol. 209, 4830 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Jamaati and M. R. Toroghinejad, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527, 4146 (2010).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Rezayat, A. Akbarzadeh, and A. Owhadi, Composite A 43, 261 (2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Alizadeh and M. H. Paydar, J. Alloys. Compd. 492, 231 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Alizadeh and M. H. Paydar, Mater. and Design. 30, 82 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Kitazono, E. Sato, and K. Kuribayashi, Acta. Mater. 50, 495 (2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Bay, CIRP Annals — Manuf. Technol. 34, 1985 (1985).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Mitani, R. Vargas, and M. Zavala, Thin. Solid. Films. 111, 37 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Mohamed and J. Washburn, Welding Research Supplement 302 (1975).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    John M. Parks, Welding Research Supplement 32, 209 (1953).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Jamaati and M. R. Toroghinejad, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 527, 4858 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. G. Lenard, Primer on Flat Rolling, pp.36–52, Elsevier, Oxford (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Kavakita and K. H. Lüdde, Powder. Technol. 4, 61 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Chakrabarty, Theory of Plasticity, pp.480–497, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Singapore (1987).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Zhang and N. Bay, Welding J. 76, 417 (1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Xie and W. Tong, Acta. Mater. 53, 477 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. R. Le, M. P. F. Sutcliffe, P. Z. Wang, and G. T. Burstein, Acta. Mater. 52, 911 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Strijbos, Ceramurgia. Int. 6, 119 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Pintaude, Wear. 255, 55 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. E. Jansson, Y. Leterrier, and J. E. Ma, Eng. Frac. Mech. 73, 2614 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations