Towards predictive stochastic dynamical modeling of cancer genesis and progression

Article

Abstract

Based on an innovative endogenous network hypothesis on cancer genesis and progression we have been working towards a quantitative cancer theory along the systems biology perspective. Here we give a brief report on our progress and illustrate that combing ideas from evolutionary and molecular biology, mathematics, engineering, and physics, such quantitative approach is feasible.

Key words

cancer stochastic processes systems biology endogenous network functional landscape 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Abedelrazeq, A.S. 2007. Spontaneous regression of colorectal cancer: A review of cases from 1900 to 2005. Int J Colorectal Disease 22, 727–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ao, P. 2004. Potential in stochastic differential equations: novel construction. J Phys 37, L25–L30.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ao, P. 2009. Global view of bionetwork dynamics: Adaptive landscape. J Genetics and Genomics 36, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Ao, P., Kwon, C., Qian, H. 2007. On the existence of potential landscape in the evolution of complex systems. Complexity 12, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ao, P., Galas, D., Hood, L., Zhu, X.-M. 2008. Cancer as Robust Intrinsic State of Endogenous Molecular-Cellular Network Shaped by Evolution. Medical Hypotheses 70, 678–684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Auffray, C., Chen, Z., Hood, L. 2009. Systems medicine: The future of medical genomics and healthcare. Genome Medicine 1, article No. 2.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bar-Yam, Y., Harmon, D., de Bivort, B. 2009. Systems biology: Attractors and democratic dynamics. Science 323, 1016–1017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cao, Y.F., Liang, J. 2008. Optimal enumeration of state space of finitely buffered stochastic molecular networks and exact computation of steady state landscape probability. BMC Syst Biol 2, article No. 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dinulos, J.G., Hawkins, D.S., Clark, B.S., Francis, J.S. 1997. Spontaneous remission of congenital leukemia. J Pediatrics 131, 300–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Greaves, M. 2001. Cancer: The Evolutionary Legacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Heng, H.H.Q., Bremer, S.W., Stevens, J.B., Ye, K.J., Liu, G., Ye, C.J. 2009. Genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity in cancer: A genome-centric perspective. J Cellular Physiology 220, 538–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Karmakar, R., Bose, I. 2007. Positive feedback, stochasticity and genetic competence. Physical Biology 4, 29–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kosko, B. 1997. Fuzzy Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kwon, C., Ao, P., Thouless, D.J. 2005. Structure of stochastic dynamics near fixed points. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 102, 13029–13033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Miao, Y., Liu, Z.Q., Siew, C.K., Miao, C.Y. 2001. Dynamical cognitive network — an extension of fuzzy cognitive map. IEEE T Fuzzy Systems 9, 760–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Morelli, M.J., Tanase-Nicola, S., Allen, R.J., ten Wolde, P.R. 2008. Reaction coordinates for the flipping of genetic switches. Biophys J 94, 3413–3423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Onuchic, J.N., Wang, J., Wolynes, P.G. 1999. Analyzing single molecule trajectories on complex energy landscapes using replica correlation functions. Chem Phys 247, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Qian, H., Shi, P.Z., Xing, J.H. 2009. Stochastic bifurcation, slow fluctuations, and bistability as an origin of biochemical complexity. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11, 4861–4870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Reynolds, C.P. 2002. Ras and Seppuku in neuroibalstorma. J Natl Cancer Inst 94, 319–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Wang, J., Huang, B., Xia, X.F., Sun, Z.R. 2006. Funneled landscape leads to robustness of cell networks: Yeast cell cycle. PLoS Comput Biol 2, 1385–1394.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Weinberg, R.A. 2007. The Biology of Cancer. Taylor and Francis, New York.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Weinreb, G.E., Elston, T.C., Jacobson, K. 2006. Causal mapping as a tool to mechanistically interpret phenomena in cell motility: Application to cortical oscillations in spreading cells. Cell Mot Cytosk 63, 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Yin, L., Ao, P. 2006. Existence and construction of dynamical potential in nonequilibrium processes without detailed balance. J Phy A39, 8593–8601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Zhang, Y.P., Qian, M.P., Ouyang, Q., Deng, M.H., Li, F.T., Tang, C. 2006. Stochastic model of yeast cellcycle network. Physica D219, 35–39.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Zhu, X.M., Yin, L., Hood, L., Ao, P. 2004. Calculating robustness of epigenetic states in phage lambda life cycle. Funct Integr Genom 4, 188–195.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Zhu, X.M., Hood, L., Galas, D., Ao, P. 2010. Construction of a molecular-cellular endogenous network prostate cancer model. To be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Scientists in the Interdisciplinary Areas and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine of Ministry of EducationShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Departments of Mechanical Engineering and PhysicsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Systems BiologySeattleUSA
  4. 4.School of PhysicsPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  5. 5.GenMath, Corp.SeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations