Advertisement

Evolving Systems

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 689–705 | Cite as

Stride towards aging problem in face recognition by applying hybrid local feature descriptors

  • Kishore Kumar KamarajugaddaEmail author
  • Trinatha Rao Polipalli
Original Paper

Abstract

In our proposed research, we developed a discriminative model for addressing the challenge of face recognition with respect to age variation by utilizing periocular region. Initially, we represent each face by using a densely sampled local feature description technique, in which multi-block local binary pattern (MB-LBP) and weber local descriptor (WLD) are adopted as the local descriptors. In this approach, extract the feature of entire facial image by the aid of both local descriptors. Since the feature space of both the MBLBP and WLD is vast, we develop an advanced multi-feature discriminant analysis to process these two local feature spaces in a unified framework. By random sampling, the training set as well as the feature space, multiple linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) classifiers are constructed and then combined to generate a robust decision via a fusion rule. In the proposed method, the MORPH and FG-NET datasets are utilized for the experimental evaluation. In the MORPH dataset, our proposed method is compared with existing methods such as SIFT, Multi scale method based on morphology, signed grey level difference (SD), LBP, scale-invariant classification, gabor, hidden factor analysis (HFA), modified HFA (MHFA) and learning discriminant face descriptors (LFD). The accuracy of face and periocular region for our method is 98.83% and 98.32%. The existing method such as sparse null linear discriminate analysis (SNLDA), direct LDA, principle component analysis + LDA, cross-age reference coding (CARC), HFA and sparse representation classification (SRC) are compared with the proposed method and obtained the recognition rate is 96.74% and 97.89%. In parameter evaluation we get following values: recall is 93.34% and 96.56%, precision is 95.49% and 94.76%, F-score is 94.40% and 92.17% for face and periocular region. In the FG-NET dataset, our proposed method is compared with existing methods such as SIFT, LBP, MLBP, MWLD and multi-feature discriminant analysis (MFDA). The average accuracy in face region and the periocular region is 65.32% and 68.92%. Our proposed method produce recognition rate as 98.11% and 97.87% for face region and periocular region when compared with SNLDA, DLDA, SRC, PCA + LDA and Coupled Auto-encoder Networks (CAN). In parameter evaluation we get following values: recall is 90.85% and 91.65%, precision is 92.35% and 94.56%, F-score is 91.59% and 90.84% for face and periocular region. Our Method has error rate as 1.7% and our error rate is less when contrasted with Agarwal et al. (21%), Wallis et al. (11.5%), Wang et al. (4.515%) and Leibe et al. (2.5%) techniques.

Keywords

Face recognition Multi-block local binary pattern (MB-LBP) Weber local descriptor (WLD) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) MORPH and FG-NET 

Notes

References

  1. Agarwal S, Awan A, Roth D (2004) Learning to detect objects in images via a sparse, part-based representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(11):1475–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvi FB, Pears R (2017) A composite spatio-temporal modeling approach for age invariant face recognition. Expert Syst Appl 72:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvi FB, Pears R, Kasabov N (2017) An evolving spatio-temporal approach for gender and age group classification with spiking neural networks. Evol Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-017-9175-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekhouche SE, Ouafi A, Benlamoudi A, Taleb-Ahmed A, Hadid A (2015) Facial age estimation and gender classification using multi level local phase quantization. In: Control, Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT), 2015 3rd international conference, Tlemcen, Algeria, 2015Google Scholar
  5. Bereta M, Karczmarek P, Pedrycz W, Reformat M (2013a) Local descriptors in application to the aging problem in face recognition. Pattern Recogn 46(10):2634–2646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bereta M, Pedrycz W, Reformat M (2013b) Local descriptors and similarity measures for frontal face recognition: a comparative analysis. J Vis Commun Image Represent 24(8):1213–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Best-Rowden L, Jain AK (2017) Longitudinal study of automatic face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2652466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty S, Singh SK, Chakraborty P (2017) Local directional gradient pattern: a local descriptor for face recognition. Multimedia Tools Appl 76(1):1201–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen B-C, Chen C-S, Hsu WH (2015) Face recognition and retrieval using cross-age reference coding with cross-age celebrity dataset. IEEE Trans Multimedia 17(6):804–815.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2015.2420374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen JH, Su MC, Cao R, Hsu SC, Lu JC (2017a) A self organizing map optimization based image recognition and processing model for bridge crack inspection. Autom Construction 73:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Z, Huang W, Lv Z (2017b) Towards a face recognition method based on uncorrelated discriminant sparse preserving projection. Multimedia Tools Appl 76(17):17669–17683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi SE, Jo J, Lee S, Choi H, Kim IJ, Kim J (2017) Age face simulation using aging functions on global and local features with residual images. Expert Syst Appl 80:107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong Y, Feng J, Yang C, Wang X, Zhen L, Pu J (2017) Multi-scale counting and difference representation for texture classification. Vis Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-017-1415-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dora L, Agrawal S, Panda R, Abraham A (2017) An evolutionary single Gabor kernel based filter approach to face recognition. Eng Appl Artif Intell 62:286–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duan Y, Lu J, Feng J, Zhou J (2017) Context-aware local binary feature learning for face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2710183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao Y, Ma J, Yuille AL (2017) Semi-supervised sparse representation based classification for face recognition with insufficient labeled samples. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(5):2545–2560MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. García-Pedrajas N, Del Castillo JAR, Cerruela-García G (2017) A proposal for local k values for k-nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learning Syst 28(2):470–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosal S, Ray N (2017) Deep deformable registration: enhancing accuracy by fully convolutional neural net. Pattern Recogn Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gong D, Li Z, Lin D, Liu J, Tang X (2013) Hidden factor analysis for age invariant face recognition. 2013 IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2013.357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayat M, Khan SH, Bennamoun M (2017) Empowering simple binary classifiers for image set based face recognition. Int J Comput Vis.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-017-1000-3 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huerta I, Fernández C, Segura C, Hernando J, Prati A (2015) A deep analysis on age estimation. Pattern Recogn Lett 68:239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jalba AC, Wilkinson MH, Roerdink JB (2004) Morphological hat-transform scale spaces and their use in pattern classification. Pattern Recogn 37(5):901–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karczmarek P, Kiersztyn A, Pedrycz W, Dolecki M (2017) An application of chain code-based local descriptor and its extension to face recognition. Pattern Recogn 65:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kishore Kumar K, Trinatha Rao P (2016) Face verification across ages using discriminative methods and see 5.0 classifier. In: Satapathy S, Das S (eds) Proceedings of first international conference on information and communication technology for intelligent systems, vol 2. Springer, Cham (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 51) Google Scholar
  25. Kumar KK, Rao PT (2018) Biometric identification using the periocular region. In: Satapathy S, Joshi A (eds) Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems (ICTIS 2017), vol 2. Springer, Cham (ICTIS 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 84) Google Scholar
  26. Lei Z, Pietikäinen M, Li SZ (2014) Learning discriminant face descriptor. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 36(2):289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leibe B, Leonardis A, Schiele B (2004) Combined object categorization and segmentation with an implicit shape model. In Workshop on statistical learning in computer vision. ECCV 2(5):7Google Scholar
  28. Li J (2017) A synthetic research on the multimedia data encryption based mobile computing security enhancement model and multi-channel mobile human computer interaction framework. Multimedia Tools Appl 76(16):16963–16987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Z, Park U, Jain AK (2011) A discriminative model for age invariant face recognition. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 6(3):1028–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2011.2156787 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li S, Gong D, Yuan Y (2013) Face recognition using Weber local descriptors. Neurocomputing 122:272–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li Z, Gong D, Li X, Tao D (2016) Aging face recognition: a hierarchical learning model based on local patterns selection. IEEE Trans Image Process 25(5):2146–2154MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li H, Zou H, Hu H (2017) Modified hidden factor analysis for cross-age face recognition. IEEE Signal Process Lett 24(4):465–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu BD, Gui L, Wan Y, Wang YX, Shen B, Li X, Wang YJ (2017) Class specific centralized dictionary learning for face recognition. Multimedia Tools Appl 76(3):4159–4177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lowe D (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vision 60:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu J, Wang G, Zhou J (2017) Simultaneous feature and dictionary learning for image set based face recognition. IEEE Trans Image Process.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2713940 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Manjunath BS, Ma WY (1996) Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 18(8):837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moeini A, Faez K, Moeini H, Safai AM (2017) Open-set face recognition across look-alike faces in real-world scenarios. Image Vis Comput 57:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ojala T, Valkealahti K, Oja E, Pietikäinen M (2001) Texture discrimination with multidimensional distributions of signed gray-level differences. Pattern Recogn 34(3):727–739zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T (2002) Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24(7):971–987zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pei T, Zhang L, Wang B, Li F, Zhang Z (2017) Decision pyramid classifier for face recognition under complex variations using single sample per person. Pattern Recogn 64:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Portillo-Portillo J, Leyva R, Sanchez V, Sanchez-Perez G, Perez-Meana H, Olivares-Mercado J, Nakano-Miyatake M (2017) A view-invariant gait recognition algorithm based on a joint-direct linear discriminant analysis. Appl Intell.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1043-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qu Q, Sun J, Wright J (2014) Finding a sparse vector in a subspace: linear sparsity using alternating directions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogozin OV, Kladov SA (2013) Comparative analysis of face recognition algoritms in problem of visual identification. Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2013-6-818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaikh MK, Tahir MA, Bouridane A (2017) Robust face recognition using kernel collaborative representation and multi-scale local binary patterns. In: Jiang R, Al-maadeed S, Bouridane A, Crookes P, Beghdadi A (eds) Biometric security and privacy. signal processing for security technologies. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  45. Shi H, Wang X, Yi D, Lei Z, Zhu X, Li SZ (2017) Cross-modality face recognition via heterogeneous joint Bayesian. IEEE Signal Process Lett 24(1):81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Surekha B, Nazare KJ, Viswanadha Raju S, Dey N (2017) Attendance recording system using partial face recognition algorithm. In: Dey N, Santhi V (eds) Intelligent techniques in signal processing for multimedia security. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 660. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  47. Urbach ER, Roerdink JB, Wilkinson MH (2007) Connected shape-size pattern spectra for rotation and scale-invariant classification of gray-scale images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(2):272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wallis G, Baddeley R (1997) Optimal, unsupervised learning in invariant object recognition. Neural Comput 9(4):883–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wan L, Liu N, Huo H, Fang T (2017) Face recognition with convolutional neural networks and subspace learning. In: Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC) 2nd international conference, Chengdu, China, 2017Google Scholar
  50. Wang X, Guo R, Kambhamettu C (2015) Deeply-learned feature for age estimation. In: 2015 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV). IEEE, pp 534–541Google Scholar
  51. Wong JJ, Cho SY (2009) A local experts organization model with application to face emotion recognition. Expert Syst Appl 36(1):804–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu YS, Ju GH, Liu HS, Chen HM (2011) Improved face recognition by integrating local binary pattern and constrained mutual subspace method. Energy Procedia 13:3280–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xie X, Jones M, Tam G (2017) Recognition, tracking, and optimisation. Int J Comput Vision 122(3):409–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xing J, Li K, Hu W, Yuan C, Ling H (2017) Diagnosing deep learning models for high accuracy age estimation from a single image. Pattern Recogn 66:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu C, Liu Q, Ye M (2017) Age invariant face recognition and retrieval by coupled auto-encoder networks. Neurocomputing 222:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yoo CH, Kim SW, Jung JY, Ko SJ (2017) High-dimensional feature extraction using bit-plane decomposition of local binary patterns for robust face recognition. J Vis Commun Image Represent 45:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang H, Patel VM (2017) Sparse representation-based open set recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39(8):1690–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang H, Zhang Y, Huang TS (2013) Pose-robust face recognition via sparse representation. Pattern Recogn 46(5):1511–1521zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhou XY, Zheng WM (2008) Novel face recognition method based on KPCA plus KDA. J Comput Appl 5:052.2008zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kishore Kumar Kamarajugadda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Trinatha Rao Polipalli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ECEFaculty of Science and Technology, IFHEHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Department of ECE, GITAM School of TechnologyGITAMHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations