Advertisement

Psychosocial Syndemics and Sexual Risk Practices Among U.S. Adolescents: Findings from the 2017 U.S. Youth Behavioral Survey

  • Moses OkumuEmail author
  • Bernadette K. Ombayo
  • Eusebius Small
  • David Ansong
Article

Abstract

Background

The present study aims to (1) identify classes of psychosocial syndemics among adolescents in the U.S. based on psychological factors, such as depression and suicidal ideation, and social factors, such as binge drinking, alcohol use, and drug use; (2) identify correlates of psychosocial syndemics; and (3) examine the independent associations between psychosocial syndemic factors and sexual risk practices.

Method

We used latent class analysis and a sample of 14,762 U.S. high school students who participated in the 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System to examine youth population profiles based on shared characteristics of syndemics. Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, we conducted logistic regression to explore the connections between psychosocial syndemic factors and three sexual risk practices, namely, early initiation of sexual intercourse, condom use, and sex with multiple partners.

Results

The study results indicate that three classes of risk exist among the sample: substance misuse (class 1, n = 3872, 26.2%), normative (class 2, n = 8791, 59.6%), and mental health problems (class 3, n = 2099, 14.2%). Class membership of psychosocial syndemics was significantly different by gender, age group, and race. The odds of initiating sexual intercourse before age 13 were positively associated with participants belonging in the substance misuse class and the mental health problem class. The odds of using condoms during the last sexual intercourse for currently sexually active adolescents were lower for participants classified in the substance misuse class. The likelihood of reporting having sex with four or more partners in a lifetime was higher among participants belonging to the substance misuse class.

Conclusion

The study advances our understanding of the heterogeneity of class membership associated with psychosocial syndemic risk factors among adolescents and extends our understanding of syndemics in the area of adolescent health. Thus, practitioners and policymakers can design multicomponent and multilevel school-based HIV/STI prevention programs that meet the needs of adolescents.

Keywords

Psychosocial syndemics Sexual risk practices Adolescents School-based health Latent class analysis United States 

Notes

Funding Information

The authors received no funding to support this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The data for this study were collected by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Ethical Approval Statement

The Institutional Review Board at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) approved the national YRBSS. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. The CDC obtained informed consent from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors listed on this study certify that we have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interests in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report, 2017. 29; 2018. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Published November 2018. Accessed 02 Feb 2019.
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV among youth, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/age/youth/. Accessed 02 Feb 2019.
  3. 3.
    Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E, Dunne EF, Mahajan R, Ocfemia MCB, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(3):187–93.  https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318286bb53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kotchick BA, Shaffer A, Miller KS, Forehand R. Adolescent sexual risk behavior: a multi-system perspective. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21(4):493–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00070-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brawner BM, Gomes MM, Jemmott LS, Deatrick JA, Coleman CL. Clinical depression and HIV risk-related sexual behaviors among African-American adolescent females: unmasking the numbers. AIDS Care. 2012;24(5):618–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2011.630344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vagi KJ, O’Malley Olsen E, Basile KC, Vivolo-Kantor AM. Teen dating violence (physical and sexual) among US high school students: findings from the 2013 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(5):474–82.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones DE, Feinberg ME, Cleveland MJ, Cooper BR. A multidomain approach to understanding risk for underage drinking: converging evidence from 5 data sets. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(11):2080–7.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The White House. National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States: updated to 2020. Whitehuse. https://www.aids.gov/federal-resources/national-hiv-aids-strategy/nhas-update.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed 15 Sept 2015.
  9. 9.
    Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, Queen B, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018;67(8):1–174.  https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santelli J, Carter M, Orr M, Dittus P. Trends in sexual risk behaviors, by nonsexual risk behavior involvement, U.S. high school students, 1991–2007. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44(4):372–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singer M, Clair S. Syndemics and public health: reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context. Med Anthropol Q. 2003;17(4):423–41.  https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2003.17.4.423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brennan J, Kuhns LM, Johnson AK, Belzer M, Wilson EC, Garofalo R, et al. Syndemic theory and HIV-related risk among young transgender women: the role of multiple, co-occurring health problems and social marginalization. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(9):1751–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dyer TP, Shoptaw S, Guadamuz TE, Plankey M, Kao U, Ostrow D, et al. Application of syndemic theory to Black men who have sex with men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. J Urban Health. 2012;89(4):697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stall R, Mills TC, Williamson J, Hart T, Greenwood G, Paul J, et al. Association of co-occurring psychosocial health problems and increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among urban men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):939–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Starks TJ, Millar BM, Eggleston JJ, Parsons JT. Syndemic factors associated with HIV risk for gay and bisexual men: comparing latent class and latent factor modeling. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(11):2075–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mustanski B, Van Wagenen A, Birkett M, Eyster S, Corliss HL. Identifying sexual orientation health disparities in adolescents: analysis of pooled data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 2005 and 2007. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):211–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martinez I, Ickovics JR, Keene DE, Perez-Escamilla R, Kershaw TS. Longitudinal evaluation of syndemic risk dyads in a cohort of young pregnant couples. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63(2):189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsai AC, Burns BFO. Syndemics of psychosocial problems and HIV risk: a systematic review of empirical tests of the disease interaction concept. Soc Sci Med. 2015;139:26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsai AC. Syndemics: a theory in search of data or data in search of a theory? Soc Sci Med. 2018;206:117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pitpitan EV, Strathdee SA, Semple SJ, Chavarin CV, Magis-Rodriguez C, Patterson TL. Buffering syndemic effects in a sexual risk-reduction intervention for male clients of female sex workers: results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:1866–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gilbert L, Raj A, Hien D, et al. Targeting the SAVA (substance abuse, violence and AIDS) syndemic among women and girls: a global review of epidemiology and integrated interventions. JAIDS. 2015;69(suppl 2):S118–27.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Newman PA, Zimmerman MA. Gender differences in HIV-related sexual risk behavior among urban African American youth: a multivariate approach. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000;12(4):308–25.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Connell CM, Gilreath TD, Hansen NB. A multiprocess latent class analysis of the co-occurrence of substance use and sexual risk behavior among adolescents. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009;70(6):943–51.  https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2009.70.943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chirinda W, Peltzer K, Ramlagan S, Louw JS. Early sexual debut and associated risk factors among male and female youth in South Africa. J Psychol Afr. 2012;22(4):601–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lowry R, Robin L, Kann L. Effect of forced sexual intercourse on association between early sexual debut and other health risk behaviors among high school students. J Sch Health. 2017;87(6):435–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Becker ML, Bhattacharjee P, Blanchard JF, et al. Vulnerabilities at first sex and their association with lifetime gender-based violence and HIV prevalence among adolescent girls and young women engaged in sex work, transactional sex, and casual sex in Kenya. JAIDS. 2018;79(3):296–304.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Okumu M, Mengo C, Ombayo B, Small E. Bullying and HIV risk among high school teenagers: the mediating role of teen dating violence. J Sch Health. 2017;87(10):743–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bonar EE, Walton MA, Epstein-Ngo QM, Zimmerman MA, Blow FC, Cunningham RM. Two-year trajectories of sexual risk behaviors among drug-using adolescents and emerging adults in an urban community. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(7):2069–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1570-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cleland CM, Lanza ST, Vasilenko SA, Gwadz M. Syndemic risk classes and substance use problems among adults in high-risk urban areas: a latent class analysis. Front Public Health. 2017;5:237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robinson AC, Knowlton AR, Gielen AC, Gallo JJ. Substance use, mental illness, and familial conflict non-negotiation among HIV-positive African-Americans: latent class regression and a new syndemic framework. J Behav Med. 2016;39:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Trajectories of risk for early sexual activity and early substance use in the Fast Track Prevention Program. Prev Sci. 2014;15(Suppl 1):33–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0328-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bennett DA. How can I deal with missing data in my study? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Oct;25(5):464–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Akaike H. Factor analysis and AIC. 1987;52(3):317–332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29.
  34. 34.
    Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6(2):461–4.  https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muthén BO, Muthén LK. Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24(6):882–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(4):535–69.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shrier LA, Walls C, Lops C, Kendall AD, Blood EA. Substance use, sexual intercourse, and condom nonuse among depressed adolescents and young adults. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(3):264–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JADOHEALTH.2011.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Logie CH, Lys C, Okumu M, et al. Pathways between depression, substance use and multiple sex partners among northern and indigenous young women in the Northwest Territories, Canada: results from a crosssectional survey. Sex Transm Infect. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans2017-053265.
  39. 39.
    Blomeyer D, Friemel CM, Buchmann AF, Banaschewski T, Laucht M, Schneider M. Impact of pubertal stage at first drink on adult drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37(10):1804–11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12154.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    DeWit DJ, Adlaf EM, Offord DR, Ogborne AC. Age at first alcohol use: a risk factor for the development of alcohol disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(5):745–50.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brown SA, McGue M, Maggs J, Schulenberg J, Hingson R, Swarzwelder S, et al. A developmental perspective on alcohol and youths 16 to 20 years of age. Pedriatics. 2008;121(4):290–310.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13314.A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brener ND, Kann L, Shanklin S, et al. Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system—2013. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013;62(RR-1):1–20 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23446553. Accessed 4 June 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social WorkUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of Social WorkUniversity of Texas, ArlingtonArlingtonUSA
  3. 3.School of Social WorkUniversity of North Carolina-Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations