Associations of Pain Intensity and Frequency With Loneliness, Hostility, and Social Functioning: Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Within-Person Relationships
The current studies investigated associations between pain intensity and pain frequency with loneliness, hostility, and social functioning using cross-sectional, longitudinal, and within-person data from community-dwelling adults with varying levels of pain.
Secondary analysis of preexisting data was conducted. Study 1 investigated cross-sectional (baseline data: n = 741) and longitudinal (follow-up data: n = 549, observed range between baseline and follow-up: 6–53 months) associations. Study 2 tested within-person associations using daily diaries across 30 days from a subset of the participants in Study 1 (n = 69).
Cross-sectionally, pain intensity and frequency were associated with higher loneliness (βintensity = 0.16, βfrequency = 0.17) and worse social functioning (βintensity = − 0.40, βfrequency = − 0.34). Intensity was also associated with higher hostility (β = 0.11). Longitudinally, pain intensity at baseline predicted hostility (β = 0.19) and social functioning (β = − 0.20) at follow-up, whereas pain frequency only predicted social functioning (β = − 0.21). Within people, participants reported higher hostility (γ = 0.002) and worse social functioning (γ = − 0.013) on days with higher pain, and a significant average pain by daily pain interaction was found for loneliness. Pain intensity did not predict social well-being variables on the following day.
Pain intensity and frequency were associated with social well-being, although the effects were dependent on the social well-being outcome and the time course being examined.
KeywordsAcute pain Biopsychosocial Community-dwelling adults Social well-being
This research was funded by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers F31AG048692, R01AG026006, and K02AG033629 and by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society under Award Number MB0026.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Eisenberger NI. Social pain and the brain: controversies, questions, and where to go from here. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:601–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115146.Google Scholar
- 5.Martin LJ, Tuttle AH, Mogil, JS. The interaction between pain and social behavior in humans and rodents. In Behavioral Neurobiology of Chronic Pain. Berlin: Springer; 2014. pp. 233–250.Google Scholar
- 6.Brown JL, Sheffield D, Leary MR, Robinson ME. Social support and experimental pain. Psychosom Med. 2003;65(2):276–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSY.0000030388.62434.46.Google Scholar
- 8.Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, Wells K, Rogers WH, Berry SD, et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA. 1989;262(7):907–13.Google Scholar
- 12.Peplau LA. Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy, vol. 36. Hoboken: Wiley; 1982.Google Scholar
- 15.Jacobs JM, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Cohen A, Stessman J. Chronic back pain among the elderly: prevalence, associations, and predictors. Spine. 2006;31(7):203–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000206367.57918.3c.Google Scholar
- 16.Hanssen DJ, Naarding P, Collard RM, Comijs HC, Voshaar RCO. Physical, lifestyle, psychological, and social determinants of pain intensity, pain disability, and the number of pain locations in depressed older adults. Pain. 2014;155(10):2088–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.019.Google Scholar
- 20.Burns JW. Anger management style and hostility: predicting symptom-specific physiological reactivity among chronic low back pain patients. J Behav Med. 1997;20(6):505–22.Google Scholar
- 22.Anderson KB, Anderson CA, Dill KE. Hostility, pain, and aggressive thoughts. Aggress Behav. 1998;24:161–71.Google Scholar
- 25.Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992:473–83.Google Scholar