Theoretical Perspectives of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions: a Scoping Review
- 950 Downloads
The purpose of this paper is to review the literature as this relates to theoretical perspectives of adherence to web-based interventions, drawing upon empirical evidence from the fields of psychology, business, information technology and health care.
A scoping review of the literature utilising principles outlined by Arksey and O’Malley was undertaken.
Several relevant theoretical perspectives have emerged, eight of which are charted and discussed in this review. These are the Internet Intervention Model, Persuasive Systems Design, the ‘PERMA’ framework, the Support Accountability Model, the Model of User Engagement, the Technology Acceptance Model, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of IT and the Conceptual Model of User Engagement.
The findings of the review indicate that an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating a range of technological, environmental and individual factors, may be needed in order to comprehensively explain user adherence to web-based interventions.
KeywordsWeb-based interventions Adherence Engagement Theory Model Framework
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This review was funded through the Waterford Institute of Technology PhD Scholarship Programme.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 10.Prestwich A, Sniehotta FF, Whittington C, Dombrowski SU, Rogers L, Michie S. Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Am Psychol Assoc; 2014.Google Scholar
- 13.Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Transl Behav Med. 2016:1–14.Google Scholar
- 22.Rogers Everett M. Diffusion of innovations. New York. 1995;12.Google Scholar
- 25.Cavanagh K. Turn on, tune in and [don’t] drop out: engagement, adherence, attrition, and alliance with internet-based interventions. In: Bennett-Levy J, Richards DA, Farrand P, Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Kavanaugh DJ, et al., editors. Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions. Oxford guides in cognitive behavioural therapy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 227–33.Google Scholar
- 28.Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications; 2012.Google Scholar
- 30.Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M. Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2009;24(1):28.Google Scholar
- 32.Short CE, Rebar AL, Plotnikoff RC, Vandelanotte C. Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: a proposed model of user engagement. Eur Health Psychol. 2015;17(1):32–8.Google Scholar
- 33.Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and persuasion: Springer; 1986. p. 1–24.Google Scholar
- 38.Davis FD Jr. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1986.Google Scholar
- 40.Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003:425–78.Google Scholar
- 41.Sun H, Zhang P. Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: an alternative approach. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2006;7(9):24.Google Scholar
- 42.Attuquayefio S, Addo H. Review of studies with UTAUT as conceptual framework. Eur Sci J, ESJ. 2014;10(8).Google Scholar
- 43.Taiwo AA, DOWNE AG. The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a meta-analytic review of empirical findings. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2013;49(1).Google Scholar
- 48.Fogg BJ, editor A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology; 2009: ACM.Google Scholar
- 50.Wildeboer L. Does the number of persuasive technology principles used in web-based interventions concerning mental health affect the effectiveness: a meta-analysis: University of Twente; 2015.Google Scholar
- 51.Pohlmeyer A. Design for happiness. Interfaces. 2012;92(8–11).Google Scholar
- 52.Seligman ME. Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Policy. 2011;27(3):60–1.Google Scholar
- 53.Titov N, Dear BF, Johnston L, Lorian C, Zou J, Wootton B, et al. Improving adherence and clinical outcomes in self- guided internet treatment for anxiety and depression: randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7).Google Scholar
- 59.Schueller SM, Mohr DC, editors. Initial field trial of a coach-supported web-based depression treatment. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare; 2015: ICST [Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering].Google Scholar
- 60.Zarski A-C, Lehr D, Berking M, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD. Adherence to internet-based mobile-supported stress management: a pooled analysis of individual participant data from three randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(6).Google Scholar
- 61.Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.Google Scholar
- 68.Murugesh-Warren A, Dubb S, Sudbury D, Nnajiuba U, Abdel-Gadir S, Caris J. An extension of the UTAUT 2 with a focus of age in healthcare: what do different ages want? Int J Integrat Care [IJIC]. 2015;15:1–3.Google Scholar
- 69.Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins: New York; 1996.Google Scholar
- 70.Beardsley MC. Some persistent issues in aesthetics. The aesthetic point of view: selected essays 1982:285–7.Google Scholar
- 71.Stephenson W. The play theory of mass communication. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 1964.Google Scholar
- 73.O’Brien H. Theoretical perspectives on user engagement. In: O’Brien H, Cairns P, editors. Why engagement matters: cross-disciplinary perspectives and innovations on user engagement with digital media. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated; 2016. p. 1–26.Google Scholar
- 74.Short CE, Vandelanotte C, Dixon MW, Rosenkranz R, Caperchione C, Hooker C, et al. Examining participant engagement in an information technology-based physical activity and nutrition intervention for men: the manup randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res protoc. 2014;3(1):e2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 76.O’Brien H, Cairns P. Why engagement matters: cross-disciplinary perspectives and innovations on user engagement with digital media. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated; 2016.Google Scholar
- 79.Stegemann SK, Weg R, Ebenfeld L, Thiart H, Berking M, Funk B. Towards measuring user engagement in internet interventions for common mental disorders. In: Proceedings of the HCI 2012, the 26th BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Birmingham, 12–14 September 2012. p. 1–4. Available from http://ewic.bcs.org/. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
- 83.Alfonsson, S. Treatment adherence in internet-based CBT. The effects of presentation, support and motivation. PhD [dissertation]. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2016. Available from: Uppsala universitetsbibliotek.Google Scholar
- 87.Johansson M, Sinadinovic K, Hammarberg A, Sundström C, Hermansson U, Andreasson S, et al. Web-based self-help for problematic alcohol use: a large naturalistic study. Int J Behav Med. 2016:1–11.Google Scholar