The Heterogeneity of Illness Behaviors in Patients with Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms
- 279 Downloads
To investigate the heterogeneity of illness behavior in patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS), we clustered patients in regard to their degree of engaging in different aspects of illness behavior and identified related variables with these behaviors.
A sample of N = 224 patients attending treatment in primary care with a history of MUPS (at least two symptoms) was investigated by analyzing different aspects of illness behavior with the self-reported number of doctor visits during the last 6 months and the Scale for the Assessment of Illness Behavior (SAIB; e.g., expression of symptoms).
Two distinct clusters were identified by cluster analysis: a low (n = 106) and a high (n = 118) illness behavior clusters. The high illness behavior cluster exhibited a significantly higher rate of health anxiety than the low illness behavior cluster. Regression analysis revealed a particular effect of sex in the high illness behavior cluster: whereas being male was associated with increased illness behavior as measured by the SAIB, being female was linked to a higher number of doctor visits. Increased health anxiety was associated with the SAIB illness behavior in both clusters. Depression and anxiety did not show incremental associations with all aspects of illness behavior.
Knowledge of the pattern of illness behavior in patients with MUPS enables us to improve psychological treatments that directly address specific aspects of illness behavior or health anxiety. Differences between sexes in illness behaviors require more differentiated consideration in future research.
KeywordsMedically unexplained physical symptoms Health care use Illness behavior Health anxiety
This study has been supported by a grant from the German Ministry of Education and Research BMBF (Head of the Project W. Rief).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was approved by the Philipps University of Marburg Ethics Committee. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Sharpe M, Mayou R, Bass C. Concepts, theories and terminology. In: Mayou R, Bass C, Sharpe M, editors. Treatment of functional somatic symptoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 3–16.Google Scholar
- 29.Meng F, Cui Y, Shen Y. Preliminary investigation on clinical features of somatoform disorders in general hospital. Chin Ment Heal J. 1999;13:67–9.Google Scholar
- 31.Rief W, Hiller W, Heuser J. SOMS—Das screening für somatoforme störungen. Manual zum fragebogen [SOMS—the screening for somatoform symptoms]. Bern: Huber-Verlag; 1997.Google Scholar
- 34.Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck depression inventory. Manual. Washington: Washington Press; 1978.Google Scholar
- 36.Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK. Cluster analysis. Newbury Park: SAGE Publishing; 1984.Google Scholar
- 38.Schendera CFG. Clusteranalyse mit SPSS. Mit Faktorenanalyse. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag; 2009.Google Scholar
- 39.Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2013.Google Scholar
- 40.Bergmann E, Kamtsiuris P. Inanspruchnahme medizinischer Leistungen [Utilization of medical services]. Gesundheitswesen. 1999;61:138–44.Google Scholar