Factors Influencing the Introduction of Physical Activity Interventions in Primary Health Care: a Qualitative Study
- 612 Downloads
The introduction of efficacious physical activity (PA) interventions in routine primary health care (PHC) is a complex process. Understanding factors influencing the process can enhance the development of successful introduction strategies.
The aim of this qualitative study was to explore stakeholders’ perceptions on factors influencing the introduction, i.e., adoption, implementation, and continuation, of PA interventions in PHC.
Twenty-eight semistructured interviews were held with intervention managers, PHC advisors, intervention providers, and referring general practitioners of five PA interventions delivered in PHC. A theoretical framework on the introduction of innovations in health care was used to guide the data collection. Influencing factors were identified using thematic analysis.
Stakeholders reported preconditions for the introduction of PA interventions in PHC (e.g., support, resources, and networks and collaborations), in addition to characteristics of PA interventions (e.g., compatibility, flexibility, and intervention materials) and characteristics of PHC professionals (e.g., knowledge, positive attitudes, and beliefs about capabilities) perceived to enhance the introduction process. Furthermore, they proposed strategies for the development of PA interventions (e.g., involvement of future stakeholders, full development, and refinement) and strategies to introduce PA interventions in PHC (e.g., training, assistance, and reinforcement). The majority of the influencing factors were discussed specifically in relation to one or two stages.
This study presents an overview of factors that are perceived to influence the introduction of PA interventions in PHC. It underscores the importance of taking these factors into account when designing introduction strategies and of giving special attention to the distinct stages of the process.
KeywordsPhysical activity Interventions Primary health care Qualitative Influencing factors Introduction Adoption Implementation Continuation
The authors wish to acknowledge Theo Paulussen and Annette Martens for their involvement in the conception and design of the study. This research was funded by ZonMw, The Netherlands Organisation of Health Research and Development (Grant Number 50-50115-96-606).
Ethical Standards and Human Rights
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
- 5.Fallon EA, Wilcox S, Laken M. Health care provider advice for African American adults not meeting health behavior recommendations. Prev Chron Dis. 2006;3(2):1–12.Google Scholar
- 10.Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach. 3rd ed. Mountain View: Mayfield; 1999.Google Scholar
- 17.Bartholomew KL, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernández ME. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011.Google Scholar
- 21.Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida; 2005.Google Scholar
- 22.Paulussen TGWM, Wiefferink K, Mesters I. Invoering van effectief gebleken interventies. In: Brug J, van Asseman P, Lechner L, editors. Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering. Assen: van Gorcum; 2007. p. 151–72.Google Scholar
- 24.Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005.Google Scholar
- 27.Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press; 1983.Google Scholar
- 30.Eakin EG, Smith BJ, Bauman AE. Evaluating the population health impact of physical activity interventions in primary care: are we asking the right questions? Phys Health. 2005;2:197–215.Google Scholar
- 37.ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. ATLAS.ti version 5.2.0. 2013.Google Scholar
- 40.Bize R, Cornuz J, Martin B. Opinions and attitudes of a sample of Swiss physicians about physical activity promotion in a primary care setting. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;55:97–100.Google Scholar
- 43.Swinburn BA, Walter LG, Arroll B, Tilyard MW, Russell DG. Green prescriptions: attitudes and perceptions of general practitioners towards prescribing exercise. Brit J Gen Pract. 1997;47(422):567–9.Google Scholar