International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 3–10 | Cite as

‘Just that Little Bit of Doubt’: Scottish Parents', Teenage Girls' and Health Professionals' Views of the MMR, H1N1 and HPV Vaccines

Article

Abstract

Background

Parental decision making about childhood vaccinations is complex and the vaccination schedule ever-changing. Vaccination may be controversial even in countries with historically high vaccination rates such as Scotland. Health behaviour models have aided understanding of individual vaccine intentions for specific vaccines. These are limited in explaining actual behaviours and are divorced from the impact of socio-cultural contexts on vaccination decision making.

Purpose

To explore vaccination views in Scotland amongst parents, teenage girls and health professionals across three controversial vaccines: the Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR), the Human Papilloma virus (HPV) and the Influenza A (H1N1) vaccine.

Method

We used qualitative interviews and focus group discussions in a purposive sample of health professionals (n = 51), parents (n = 15) and teenage girls aged 12–15 years (n = 8) about their views of these vaccines. Discussions were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Two main themes are highlighted: ‘vaccine risks revisited’ in which we explored how the MMR legacy resurfaced and how worries about vaccine safety permeated the data. ‘Vaccine responsibilities’ indicated tensions regarding roles and responsibilities for vaccines. An overarching notion of ‘just that little bit of doubt’ referred to lingering doubts and uncertainties interwoven across the vaccines.

Conclusions

Public health authorities should remain alert towards pervasive vaccine concerns. It is important for authorities to clarify vaccine roles and responsibilities in the face of new and existing vaccines and to acknowledge public concerns regarding vaccine safety.

Keywords

Qualitative MMR vaccine H1N1 vaccine HPV vaccine Parents Young people Health professionals 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part through the NHS Lothian Health Service Research Programme and in part through funding from Edinburgh Napier University. Thanks to Patricia McIntosh for facilitating this work and also to the clinical leads and parents, young people and health professionals who participated in this study. We also thank the study steering group for guidance during the conduct of this study.

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Immunization against diseases of public health importance. Fact sheet no. 288. 2005. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/fact_sheet/2005/FS_288.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2013.
  2. 2.
    Marks DF, Murray M, Evans B, Vida Estacio E. Health psychology: theory, research and practice. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2011.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NHS Health Scotland. Immunisation Scotland. 2010. http://www.immunisationscotland.org.uk/. Accessed 5 May 2013.
  4. 4.
    Health Protection Newsletter. Health Protection Team, Public Health Directorate. Edinburgh: Lothian NHS Board; April 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    NHS Information Service Division (ISD). HPV immunisation uptake statistics: HPV immunisation programme—school year 2011/12.2012. http://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Child-Health/Publications/2012-09-25/2012-09-25-HPV-Uptake-Report.pdf?22854250670. Accessed 5 May 2013.
  6. 6.
    Kumar VM, Whynes DK. Explaining variation on the uptake of HPV vaccination in England. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(172). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-172.
  7. 7.
    Walker J, Huc S, Sinka K, Tissington A, Oates K. Ongoing outbreak of mumps infection in Oban, Scotland, November 2010 to January 2011. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(8).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Measles and rubella monitoring, April 2013. Surveillance reports 24 April 2013.http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/measles-rubella-monitoring-April-2013.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2013.
  9. 9.
    Public Health Wales. Measles outbreaks: data. http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/888/page/66389. Accessed 21 August 2013.
  10. 10.
    Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nudular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet. 1998;351:637–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poland GA, Spiers R. Fear, misinformation, and innumerates: how the Wakefield paper, the press, and advocacy groups damaged the public health. Vaccine. 2010;28(12):2361–2. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.052.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stöckl A. Public discourse and policymaking: the HPV vaccination from the European perspective. In: Wailoo K, Livingston J, Epstein S, Aronowitz R, editors. Three shots at prevention: the HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 2010. p. 254–69.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brabin L, Roberts SA, Stretch R, Baxter D, Chambers G, Kitchener H, et al. Uptake of first two doses of human papillomavirus vaccine by adolescent schoolgirls in Manchester: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1056–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39541.534109BE.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hilton S, Hunt K, Langan M, Bedford H, Petticrew M. Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005–2008). Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(6):942–50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.027.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hilton S, Hunt K. Coverage of Jade Goody's cervical cancer in UK newspapers: a missed opportunity for health promotion? BMC Public Health. 2010;10:368. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-368.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenthal SL, Weiss TW, Zimet GD, Ma L, Good MB, Vichnin MD. Predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among women aged 19–26: importance of a physician's recommendation. Vaccine. 2011;29(5):890–5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sturm LA, Mays RM, Zimet G. Parental beliefs and decisions making about child and adolescent immunization: from polio to sexually transmitted infections. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005;26(6):441–52. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200512000-00009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Henderson R, Oates K, Macdonald H, Smith WCS. General practitioners' concerns about childhood immunisation and suggestions for improving professional support and vaccine uptake. Commun Dis Public Health. 2004;7(4):260–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Macdonald H, Henderson R, Oates K. Low uptake of immunisation: contributing factors. Community Pract. 2004;77(3):95–100.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boyce T, Holmes A. Addressing health inequalities in the delivery of the human papillomavirus vaccination programme: examining the role of the school nurse. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e43416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043416.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mills E, Jadad AR, Ross C, et al. Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental beliefs and attitudes toward childhood vaccination identifies common barriers to vaccination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;58:1081–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brown KA, Kroll JS, Hudson MJ, et al. Omission bias and vaccine rejection by parents of healthy children: implications for the influenza A/H1N1 vaccination programme. Vaccine. 2010;28(25):4181–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roberts KA, Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Lancet. 2002;360:1596–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brown K, Kroll JS, Hudon MJ, et al. Factors underlying parental decisions about combination vaccinations including MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2010;28(26):4235–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Juraskova I, O'Brien M, Mullan B, Bari R, Laidsaar-Powell R, McCaffery K. HPV Vaccination and the effect of information framing on intentions and behaviour: an application of the theory of planned behaviour and moral norm. Int J Behav Med. 2012;19(4):518–25. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9182-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mielewczyk F, Willig C. Old clothes and an older look: the case for a radical makeover in health behaviour research. Theory Psychol. 2007;17(16):811–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poltorak M, Leach M, Fairhead J, et al. ‘MMR talk’ and vaccination choices: an ethnographic study in Brighton. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:709–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McMurray R, Cheater FM, Weighall A, et al. Managing controversy through consultation: a qualitative study of communication and trust around MMR vaccination decisions. Br Gen Pract. 2004;54:520–5.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hilton S, Hunt K, Petticrew M. Gaps in parental understandings and experiences of vaccine-preventable diseases: a qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev. 2006;33(2):170–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Iturriza-Gomera M, Cunliffe N. Rotavirus vaccine: a welcome addition to the immunisation schedule in the UK. BMJ. 2013;346:f2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kmietowicz Z. Children in England to get flu vaccine at age 2 years from September. BMJ. 2013;346:f2792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Editors, Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nudular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet. 2010;375:445.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    BBC News. MMR scare doctor acted unethically panel finds. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8483865.stm
  35. 35.
    Fairhead J, Leach M. Vaccine anxieties: global science, child health and society. London: Earthscan Publications; 2007.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Raithatha N, Holland R, Gerrard S, et al. A qualitative investigation of vaccine risk perception amongst parents who immunize their children: a public health concern. J Public Health Med. 2003;25(2):161–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hilton S, Smith E. “I thought cancer was one of those random things. I didn't know cancer could be caught…”: adolescent girls' understandings and experiences of the HPV programme in the UK. Vaccine. 2011;29(26):4409–15.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang C, Gotsis M, Jordan-Marsh M. Social media microblogs as an HPV vaccination forum. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;10 Jul 9(11).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Keelan J, Pavri V, Balakrishnan R, Wilson K. An analysis of the human of the human papilloma virus vaccine debate on MySpace blogs. Vaccine. 2010;28(6):1535–40. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.060.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walsh CD, Gera A, Shah M, Sharma A, Powell JA, Wlison S. Public knowledge and attitudes towards human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:368. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-368.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Helseth S. What informs parents' decision-making about childhood vaccinations? J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(11):2421–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Smith P. The emotional labour of nursing revisited — can nurses still care? 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Larson HL, Cooper LZ, Eskola J, Katz SL, Ratzan S. Addressing the vaccine confidence gap. Lancet. 2011;378:526–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catriona Kennedy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carol Gray Brunton
    • 1
  • Rhona Hogg
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social CareEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Health Sciences BuildingUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland
  3. 3.Health Services Research UnitNHS LothianEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations