‘Just that Little Bit of Doubt’: Scottish Parents', Teenage Girls' and Health Professionals' Views of the MMR, H1N1 and HPV Vaccines
- 631 Downloads
Parental decision making about childhood vaccinations is complex and the vaccination schedule ever-changing. Vaccination may be controversial even in countries with historically high vaccination rates such as Scotland. Health behaviour models have aided understanding of individual vaccine intentions for specific vaccines. These are limited in explaining actual behaviours and are divorced from the impact of socio-cultural contexts on vaccination decision making.
To explore vaccination views in Scotland amongst parents, teenage girls and health professionals across three controversial vaccines: the Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR), the Human Papilloma virus (HPV) and the Influenza A (H1N1) vaccine.
We used qualitative interviews and focus group discussions in a purposive sample of health professionals (n = 51), parents (n = 15) and teenage girls aged 12–15 years (n = 8) about their views of these vaccines. Discussions were analysed using thematic analysis.
Two main themes are highlighted: ‘vaccine risks revisited’ in which we explored how the MMR legacy resurfaced and how worries about vaccine safety permeated the data. ‘Vaccine responsibilities’ indicated tensions regarding roles and responsibilities for vaccines. An overarching notion of ‘just that little bit of doubt’ referred to lingering doubts and uncertainties interwoven across the vaccines.
Public health authorities should remain alert towards pervasive vaccine concerns. It is important for authorities to clarify vaccine roles and responsibilities in the face of new and existing vaccines and to acknowledge public concerns regarding vaccine safety.
KeywordsQualitative MMR vaccine H1N1 vaccine HPV vaccine Parents Young people Health professionals
This study was funded in part through the NHS Lothian Health Service Research Programme and in part through funding from Edinburgh Napier University. Thanks to Patricia McIntosh for facilitating this work and also to the clinical leads and parents, young people and health professionals who participated in this study. We also thank the study steering group for guidance during the conduct of this study.
Conflict of Interest
- 1.World Health Organization. Immunization against diseases of public health importance. Fact sheet no. 288. 2005. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/fact_sheet/2005/FS_288.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2013.
- 2.Marks DF, Murray M, Evans B, Vida Estacio E. Health psychology: theory, research and practice. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2011.Google Scholar
- 3.NHS Health Scotland. Immunisation Scotland. 2010. http://www.immunisationscotland.org.uk/. Accessed 5 May 2013.
- 4.Health Protection Newsletter. Health Protection Team, Public Health Directorate. Edinburgh: Lothian NHS Board; April 2008.Google Scholar
- 5.NHS Information Service Division (ISD). HPV immunisation uptake statistics: HPV immunisation programme—school year 2011/12.2012. http://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Child-Health/Publications/2012-09-25/2012-09-25-HPV-Uptake-Report.pdf?22854250670. Accessed 5 May 2013.
- 6.Kumar VM, Whynes DK. Explaining variation on the uptake of HPV vaccination in England. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(172). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-172.
- 7.Walker J, Huc S, Sinka K, Tissington A, Oates K. Ongoing outbreak of mumps infection in Oban, Scotland, November 2010 to January 2011. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(8).Google Scholar
- 8.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Measles and rubella monitoring, April 2013. Surveillance reports 24 April 2013.http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/measles-rubella-monitoring-April-2013.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2013.
- 9.Public Health Wales. Measles outbreaks: data. http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/888/page/66389. Accessed 21 August 2013.
- 12.Stöckl A. Public discourse and policymaking: the HPV vaccination from the European perspective. In: Wailoo K, Livingston J, Epstein S, Aronowitz R, editors. Three shots at prevention: the HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 2010. p. 254–69.Google Scholar
- 14.Hilton S, Hunt K, Langan M, Bedford H, Petticrew M. Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005–2008). Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(6):942–50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.027.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Macdonald H, Henderson R, Oates K. Low uptake of immunisation: contributing factors. Community Pract. 2004;77(3):95–100.Google Scholar
- 25.Juraskova I, O'Brien M, Mullan B, Bari R, Laidsaar-Powell R, McCaffery K. HPV Vaccination and the effect of information framing on intentions and behaviour: an application of the theory of planned behaviour and moral norm. Int J Behav Med. 2012;19(4):518–25. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9182-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.McMurray R, Cheater FM, Weighall A, et al. Managing controversy through consultation: a qualitative study of communication and trust around MMR vaccination decisions. Br Gen Pract. 2004;54:520–5.Google Scholar
- 33.Editors, Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nudular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet. 2010;375:445.Google Scholar
- 34.BBC News. MMR scare doctor acted unethically panel finds. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8483865.stm
- 35.Fairhead J, Leach M. Vaccine anxieties: global science, child health and society. London: Earthscan Publications; 2007.Google Scholar
- 38.Zhang C, Gotsis M, Jordan-Marsh M. Social media microblogs as an HPV vaccination forum. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;10 Jul 9(11).Google Scholar
- 42.Smith P. The emotional labour of nursing revisited — can nurses still care? 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.Google Scholar