Associations Between Supportive Leadership and Employees Self-Rated Health in an Occupational Sample
- 1.1k Downloads
Protecting the health of the work force has become an important issue in public health research.
This study aims to explore potential associations between supportive leadership style (SLS), an aspect of leadership behavior, and self-rated health (SRH) among employees.
We drew on cross-sectional data from a cohort of industrial workers (n = 3,331), collected in 2009. We assessed employees' ratings of supportive, employee-oriented leadership behavior at their job, their SRH, and work stress as measured by the effort–reward model and scales measuring demands, control, and social support. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the perception of poor SLS and poor SRH controlling for work-related stress and other confounders. Sensitivity analyses stratified models by sex, age, and managerial position to test the robustness of associations.
Perception of poor SLS was associated with poor SRH [OR 2.39 (95 % CI 1.95–2.92)]. Although attenuated following adjustment for measures of work-related stress and other confounders [OR 1.60 (95 % CI 1.26–2.04)], the magnitude, direction, and significance of this association remained robust in stratified models in most subgroups.
SLS appears to be relevant to health in the workplace. Leadership behavior may represent a promising area for future research with potential for promoting better health in a large segment of the adult population.
KeywordsLeadership Self-rated health Occupational Health Workplace Work stress
We want to thank the HealthVision Ltd. for providing us with data for this study.
Conflict of Interest
Prof. Dr. Joachim E. Fischer is a scientific advisor for HealthVision Ltd., the company providing data for this analysis.
- 20.Leka S, Jain A. Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. Geneva: WHO; 2010.Google Scholar
- 23.Herr RM, Li J, Bosch JA, Schmidt B, Dejoy DM, Fischer JE, et al. Psychometric properties of a German organizational justice questionnaire (G-OJQ) and its association with self-rated health: findings from the Mannheim Industrial Cohort Studies (MICS). Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0839-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Stößel U, Michaelis M, Hofmann F. Measuring psychological stress and strain at work: evaluation of the COPSOQ questionnaire in Germany Methoden zur Erfassung Psychischer Belastungen. GMS Psychosoc Med. 2006;3:1–14.Google Scholar
- 31.Karasek R, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. 1998;3(4):322–55.Google Scholar
- 32.Karasek RD, Theorell T. Healthy work. New York: Perseus; 1990.Google Scholar
- 34.Kivimäki M, Nyberg S, Batty G, et al. Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2012;6736(12):1–7.Google Scholar
- 38.Rosengren A, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Sliwa K, Zubaid M, Almahmeed WA, et al. Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):953–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar