Psychometric Properties of the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale in Dutch Primary Care Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- 545 Downloads
Excercise self-efficacy is believed to influence physical activity bahavior.
The purpose of this study is to assess the psychometric aspects of the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (ESS) in a type 2 diabetes Dutch Primary care sample.
Type 2 diabetes patients (n = 322; <80 years old) filled in the ESS and the short questionnaire to assess health enhancing physical activity (SQUASH). The structural validity of the ESS was assessed by means of principal axis factor analyses and confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, reliability and concurrent validity with the SQUASH outcomes “total” and “leisure time minutes/week of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity” were evaluated. T tests and ANOVAs were used to examine ESS scores in subgroups. In addition, a 13-item version of the ESS was developed.
Analyses were performed on complete cases (n = 255). Exploratory factor analysis suggested one underlying factor (total explained variance 54 %), with good internal consistency (α = 0.95). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a poor fit, as did a three-factor model suggested in an earlier research. Therefore, a 13-item ESS was developed with one underlying factor (total explained variance 59 %) and good internal consistency (α = 0.95). Both the 18-item and 13-item ESS correlated significantly with total and leisure time physical activity. ESS scores differed significantly between categories of education level and physical activity level.
The 13-item ESS had sound psychometric properties in a large sample of primary care type 2 diabetes patients. The 13-item ESS could be useful in (intervention) research on physical activity in type 2 diabetes patients.
KeywordsSelf-efficacy Exercise/physical activity Psychometrics Type 2 diabetes Primary care
This study was financially supported by CZ Health Insurance. We thank PoZoB for their participation.
- 11.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.Google Scholar
- 13.Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing; 2006. p. 307–37.Google Scholar
- 20.Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 21.Sijtsma K, Molenaar IW. Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory. California: SAGE; 2002.Google Scholar
- 22.Lipsey M. Design sensitivity: statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990. p. 54–76.Google Scholar
- 23.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Psychology Press; 1988.Google Scholar