International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 337–347 | Cite as

Social Capital and Self-rated Health Amongst Older People in Western Finland and Northern Sweden: A Multi-level Analysis

  • Fredrica Nyqvist
  • Mikael Nygård
  • Wouter Steenbeek
Article

Abstract

Background

Social capital can be conceptualised as an individual resource residing in relationships between individuals or as a collective resource produced through interactions in neighbourhoods, communities or societies. Previous studies suggest that social capital is, in general, good for health. However, there is a shortage of studies analysing the association between individual and collective social capital in relation to health amongst older people.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between municipal- and individual-level social capital and self-rated health amongst older people in Western Finland and Northern Sweden.

Method

Data were retrieved from a cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey conducted in 2010. The study included, in total, 6,838 people aged 65, 70, 75 and 80 years living in the two Bothnia regions, Västerbotten, Sweden and Pohjanmaa, Finland. The association between social capital and self-rated health was tested through multi-level logistic regression analyses with ecometric tests. Social capital was measured by two survey items: interpersonal trust and social participation.

Results

Individual-level social capital including social participation and trust was significantly associated with self-rated health. A negative association was found between municipal-level trust and health. However, almost all variation in self-rated health resided on the individual level.

Conclusions

We conclude that contextual-level social capital on a municipal level is less important for understanding the influence of social capital on health in the Bothnia region of Finland and Sweden. On the other hand, our study shows that individual-level social participation and trust have a positive and significant association with self-rated health. We suggest that other ways of defining social capital at the collective level, such as the inclusion of neighbourhood social capital, could be one direction for future research.

Keywords

Social capital Self-rated health Older people Sweden Finland 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The GERDA Project was supported by the Interreg-programme Botnia Atlantica, the Regional Council of Ostrobothnia, Umeå Municipality, and the GERDA Project partners, including Åbo Akademi University, Novia University of Applied Sciences, and Umeå University. The work by FN was financially supported by the Academy of Finland (project no. 250054) as part of the FLARE-2 programme.

References

  1. 1.
    Kawachi I. Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Commentary: reconciling the three accounts of social capital. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(4):682–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Silva MJ, McKenzie K, Harpham T, Huttly SRA. Social capital and mental illness: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(8):619–27.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nyqvist F, Forsman AK, Giuntoli G, Cattan M. Social capital as a resource for mental well-being in older people: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health. 2012. doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.742490.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Almedom AM. Social capital and mental health: an interdisciplinary review of primary evidence. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(5):943–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Islam MK, Merlo J, Kawachi I, Lindström M, Gerdtham U. Social capital and health: does egalitarianism matter? A literature review. Int J Equity Health. 2006;5(1):3. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-5-3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim D, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. Social capital and physical health: a systematic review of the literature. In: Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Kim D, editors. Social capital and health. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 139–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gray A. The social capital of older people. Ageing Soc. 2009;29(1):5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walker A. A strategy for active ageing. Int Soc Sec Rev. 2002;55(1):121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organisation. Active ageing: a policy framework. Geneva: WHO; 2002.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Putnam RD. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Putnam RD. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hooghe M, Stolle D. Generating social capital: civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Woolcock M. The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. ISUMA Can J Pol Res. 2001;2(1):1–17.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of social capital. In: Richardson J, editor. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood. p. 241–8Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol. 1988;94:S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin N. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Engström K, Mattsson F, Jarleborg A, Hallqvist J. Contextual social capital as a risk factor for poor self-rated health: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(11):2268–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Poortinga W. Social capital: an individual or collective resource for health? Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(2):292–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Subramanian S, Kim D, Kawachi I. Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health. 2002;79:S21–34.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sundquist K, Yang M. Linking social capital and self-rated health: a multilevel analysis of 11,175 men and women in Sweden. Health Place. 2007;13(2):324–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Snelgrove JW, Pikhart H, Stafford M. A multilevel analysis of social capital and self-rated health: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(11):1993–2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eurostat (2012) Europe in figures. Eurostat yearbook 2011. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2011. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-CD-11-001/EN/KS-CD-11-001-EN.PDF Accessed 30 Jan 2012
  23. 23.
    Carlson P. The European health divide: a matter of financial or social capital? Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(9):1985–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumlin S, Rothstein B. Making and breaking social capital: the impact of welfare-state institutions. Comp Political Stud. 2005;38(4):339–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pichler F, Wallace C. Patterns of formal and informal social capital in Europe. Eur Sociol Rev. 2007;23(4):423–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    van Oorschot W, Arts W, Gelissen J. Social capital in Europe. Acta Sociol. 2006;49(2):149–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kautto M (2001) Diversity among welfare states. Research reports 118Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McRae KD. Conflict and compromise in multilingual societies, Finland. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gray L, Merlo J, Mindell J, Hallqvist J, Tafforeau J, O'Reilly D, et al. International differences in self-reported health measures in 33 major metropolitan areas in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2010. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq170.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cavelaars AEJM, Kunst A, Geurts J, Crialesi R, Grotvedt L, Helmert U, et al. Differences in self reported morbidity by educational level: a comparison of 11 Western European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(4):219–27.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kunst AE, Bos V, Lahelma E, Bartley M, Lissau I, Regidor E, et al. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 10 European countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(2):295–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Westman J, Martelin T, Härkänen T, Koskinen S, Sundquist K. Migration and self-rated health: a comparison between Finns living in Sweden and Finns living in Finland. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36(7):698–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38(1):21–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Månsson N, Råstam L. Self-rated health as a predictor of disability pension and death: a prospective study of middle-aged men. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29(2):151–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Idler EL, Kasl SV. Self-ratings of health: do they also predict change in functional ability? J Geront, Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1995;50B(6):S344–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Manderbacka K, Lahelma E, Martikainen P. Examining the continuity of self-rated health. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(2):208–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Raudenbush SW, Sampson RJ. Ecometrics: toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociol Methodol. 1999;29(1):1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mohnen SM, Groenewegen PP, Völker BMG, Flap HD. Neighborhood social capital and individual health. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(5):660–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. J Econometrics. 2005;128(2):301–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Steenbeek W, Hipp JR. A longitudinal test of social disorganization theory: feedback effects among cohesion, social control, and disorder. Criminology. 2011;49(3):833–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Snijders T, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yen IH, Michael YL, Perdue L. Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:455–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Eriksson M, Ng N, Weinehall L, Emmelin M. The importance of gender and conceptualization for understanding the association between collective social capital and health: a multilevel analysis from northern Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(2):264–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Portes A, Landolt P. The downside of social capital. Am Prospect. 1996;26:18–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fredrica Nyqvist
    • 1
  • Mikael Nygård
    • 2
  • Wouter Steenbeek
    • 3
  1. 1.National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)Mental Health Promotion UnitVaasaFinland
  2. 2.Department of Social PolicyÅbo Akademi UniversityVaasaFinland
  3. 3.Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR)AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations