International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 230–239

The Association of Type 2 Diabetes Patient and Spouse Illness Representations with Their Well-being: A Dyadic Approach




The aim of this study was to examine the relation between certain illness representations and the physical and psychological well-being of persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus and their spouses.


In this study, we examined the relation of type 2 diabetes patients and their spouses’ representations of illness consequences and timeline (chronicity and cyclicality/predictability) to the physical and psychological well-being of both. The interaction between patient and spouse illness representations was also studied.


A dyadic analysis approach was employed, while the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model was used to examine dyadic effects. One hundred and sixty-eight individuals nested in 84 couples participated.


Regarding illness representations, both actor (i.e., the effects of a person’s own characteristics on own outcomes) and partner (i.e., the effects of the partner’s characteristics on a person’s outcomes) effects were identified but only for patients’ well-being. Certain significant interactions were also found: patients’ timeline-cyclical representations were weakly associated with their anxiety and depression symptoms when spouses perceived diabetes as less unpredictable. Also, spouses’ perceptions of consequences were more strongly related to their anxiety when patients perceived diabetes as less burdensome.


Overall, the findings indicate a type of synergy between patient and spouse illness representations. They also emphasize the interdependence between diabetes patients and their partners, and the need to examine adaptation to illness within a dyadic-regulation framework as well.


Adaptation to chronic illness Diabetes mellitus type 2 Dyadic analysis Dyadic regulation Illness representations 


  1. 1.
    Aikens JE, Wagner LI. Diabetes mellitus and other endocrine disorders. In: Camic P, Knight S, editors. Clinical handbook of health psychology. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber; 2004. p. 117–38.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woodcock A, Bradley C. Diabetes mellitus. In: Ayers S, Baum A, McManus C, Newman S, Wallston K, Weinman J, West R, editors. Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 670–3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vijan S. Type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:ITC31–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fritschi C, Quinn L. Fatigue in patients with diabetes: a review. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69:33–41.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Renn BN, Feliciano L, Segal DL. The bidirectional relationship of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:1239–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roy T, Lloyd CE. Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;142S1:S8–S21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan TJ, Arean P, Glasgow R, Masharani U. A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Med. 2008;25:1096–101.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li C, Barker L, Ford ES, Zhang X, Strine TW, Mokdad AH. Diabetes and anxiety in US adults: findings from the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Diabetic Med. 2008;25:878–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lloyd CE, Roy T, Nouwen A, Chauhan AM. Epidemiology of depression in diabetes: international and cross-cultural issues. J Affect Disord. 2012;142S1:S22–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katon WJ. The comorbidity of diabetes mellitus and depression. Am J Med. 2008;121:S8–S15.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    August KJ, Rook KS, Parris Stephens MA, Franks MM. Are spouses of chronically ill partners burdened by exerting health-related social control? J Health Psychol. 2011;16:1109–19.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisher L, Chesla CA, Skaff MM, Mullan JT, Kanter RA. Depression and anxiety among partners of European-American and Latino patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1564–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franks MM, Lucas T, Stephens MAP, Rook KS, Gonzalez R. Diabetes distress and depressive symptoms: a dyadic investigation of older patients and their spouses. Fam Relat. 2010;59:599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hunt KJ, Heiss G, Sholinsky PD, Province MA. Familial history of metabolic disorders and the multiple metabolic syndrome: the NHLBI family heart study. Genet Epidemiol. 2000;19:395–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan A, Lasker SS, Chowdhury TA. Are spouses of patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk of developing diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2003;26:710–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Searle A, Norman P, Thompson R, Vedhara K. Illness representations among patients with type 2 diabetes and their partners: relationships with self-management behaviors. J Psychosom Res. 2007;63:175–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: Revenson TA, Kayser K, Bodenmann G, editors. Couples coping with stress: emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2005. p. 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010;29:169–80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:920–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coyne JC, Smith DAF. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on wives’ distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61:404–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coyne JC, Smith DAF. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. J Fam Psychol. 1994;8:43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The Common-Sense Representations Of Illness Danger. In: Rachman S, editor. Medical psychology, vol. 2. New York: Pergamon; 1980. p. 7–30.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leventhal H, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition treatment. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16:223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heijmans M, de Ridder D, Bensing J. Dissimilarity in patients’ and spouses’ representations of chronic illness: explorations of relations to patient adaptation. Psychol Health. 1999;14:451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benyamini Y, Medalion B, Garfinkel D. Patient and spouse perceptions of the patient’s heart disease and their associations with received and provided social support and undermining. Psychol Health. 2007;22:765–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Figueiras MJ, Weinman J. Do similar patient and spouse perceptions of myocardial infarction predict recovery? Psychol Health. 2003;18:201–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sterba KR, DeVellis RF, Lewis MA, DeVellis B, Jordan JM, Baucom DH. Effect of couple illness perception congruence on psychological adjustment in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychol. 2008;27:221–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health. 2002;17:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hemphill RC, Parris Stephens MA, Rook KS, Franks MM, Salem JK. Older adults’ beliefs about the timeline of type 2 diabetes and adherence to dietary regimens. Psychol Health. 2012. doi:10.1080/08870446.2012.685740.
  30. 30.
    Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ. Personal models of diabetes and their relations to self-care activities. Health Psychol. 1990;9:632–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Paddison CAM, Alpass FM, Stephens CV. Psychological factors account for variation in metabolic control and perceived quality of life among people with type 2 diabetes in New Zealand. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15:180–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Searle A, Norman P, Thompson R, Vedhara K. A prospective examination of illness beliefs and coping in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Health Psychol. 2007;12:621–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hagger MS, Orbell S. A meta-analytic review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations. Psychol Health. 2003;18:141–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martin R, Leventhal H. Symptom perception and health care-seeking behavior. In: Boll TJ, Raczynski JM, Leviton LC, editors. Handbook of clinical health psychology, vol. 2. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2004. p. 299–328.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Paschalides C, Wearden AJ, Dunkerley R, Bundy C, Davies R, Dickens CM. The associations of anxiety, depression and personal illness representations with glycaemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:557–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Watkins KW, Connell CM, Fitzgerald JT, Klem L, Hickey T, Ingersoll-Dayton B. Effect of adults’ self-regulation of diabetes on quality-of-life outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1511–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Foster LS. Personal models of diabetes among older adults: relationship to self-management and other variables. Diabetes Educ. 1995;21:300–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA, Patrick-Miller L, et al. Illness representations: theoretical foundations. In: Weinman J, Petrie K, editors. Perceptions of health and illness. London: Harwood Publishers; 1997. p. 19–45.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mann DM, Ponieman D, Leventhal H, Halm EA. Predictors of adherence to diabetes medications: the role of disease and medication beliefs. J Behav Med. 2009;32:278–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weinberger M, Kirkman S, Samsa GP, Cowper PA, Shortliffe EA, Simel DL, et al. The relation between glycemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Med Care. 1994;32:1173–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcome Study approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (validity and reliability). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Katsouda E, Galanos A, Vlahos L. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Greek cancer patients: psychometric analyses and applicability. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:821–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford; 2006.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Joreskog KG, Sorbom D. LISREL 8 user’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 1993.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cook WL, Kenny DA. The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: a model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. Int J Behav Dev. 2005;29:101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Whitford DL, McGee H, O’Sullivan B. Will people with type 2 diabetes speak to family members about health risk? Diabetes Care. 2009;32:251–3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Williams PG, Wasserman MS, Lotto AJ. Individual differences in self-assessed health: an information-processing investigation of health and illness cognition. Health Psychol. 2003;22:3–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Martire LM, Lustig AP, Schulz R, Miller GE, Helgeson VS. Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychol. 2004;23:599–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CreteRethymnonGreece

Personalised recommendations