The Association of Type 2 Diabetes Patient and Spouse Illness Representations with Their Well-being: A Dyadic Approach
- First Online:
- 363 Downloads
The aim of this study was to examine the relation between certain illness representations and the physical and psychological well-being of persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus and their spouses.
In this study, we examined the relation of type 2 diabetes patients and their spouses’ representations of illness consequences and timeline (chronicity and cyclicality/predictability) to the physical and psychological well-being of both. The interaction between patient and spouse illness representations was also studied.
A dyadic analysis approach was employed, while the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model was used to examine dyadic effects. One hundred and sixty-eight individuals nested in 84 couples participated.
Regarding illness representations, both actor (i.e., the effects of a person’s own characteristics on own outcomes) and partner (i.e., the effects of the partner’s characteristics on a person’s outcomes) effects were identified but only for patients’ well-being. Certain significant interactions were also found: patients’ timeline-cyclical representations were weakly associated with their anxiety and depression symptoms when spouses perceived diabetes as less unpredictable. Also, spouses’ perceptions of consequences were more strongly related to their anxiety when patients perceived diabetes as less burdensome.
Overall, the findings indicate a type of synergy between patient and spouse illness representations. They also emphasize the interdependence between diabetes patients and their partners, and the need to examine adaptation to illness within a dyadic-regulation framework as well.
KeywordsAdaptation to chronic illness Diabetes mellitus type 2 Dyadic analysis Dyadic regulation Illness representations
- 1.Aikens JE, Wagner LI. Diabetes mellitus and other endocrine disorders. In: Camic P, Knight S, editors. Clinical handbook of health psychology. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber; 2004. p. 117–38.Google Scholar
- 2.Woodcock A, Bradley C. Diabetes mellitus. In: Ayers S, Baum A, McManus C, Newman S, Wallston K, Weinman J, West R, editors. Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 670–3.Google Scholar
- 22.Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The Common-Sense Representations Of Illness Danger. In: Rachman S, editor. Medical psychology, vol. 2. New York: Pergamon; 1980. p. 7–30.Google Scholar
- 29.Hemphill RC, Parris Stephens MA, Rook KS, Franks MM, Salem JK. Older adults’ beliefs about the timeline of type 2 diabetes and adherence to dietary regimens. Psychol Health. 2012. doi:10.1080/08870446.2012.685740.
- 34.Martin R, Leventhal H. Symptom perception and health care-seeking behavior. In: Boll TJ, Raczynski JM, Leviton LC, editors. Handbook of clinical health psychology, vol. 2. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2004. p. 299–328.Google Scholar
- 35.Paschalides C, Wearden AJ, Dunkerley R, Bundy C, Davies R, Dickens CM. The associations of anxiety, depression and personal illness representations with glycaemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:557–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA, Patrick-Miller L, et al. Illness representations: theoretical foundations. In: Weinman J, Petrie K, editors. Perceptions of health and illness. London: Harwood Publishers; 1997. p. 19–45.Google Scholar
- 41.Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcome Study approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
- 45.Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford; 2006.Google Scholar
- 46.Joreskog KG, Sorbom D. LISREL 8 user’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 1993.Google Scholar