Advertisement

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 582–589 | Cite as

Changes in Illness Perceptions and Quality of Life During Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation

  • Veronica Janssen
  • Véronique De Gucht
  • Henk van Exel
  • Stan Maes
Article

Abstract

Background

The beliefs patients hold about their disease and corresponding treatment have been shown to predict recovery in cardiac patients.

Purpose

However, it is not known to what extent these beliefs change during participation in cardiac rehabilitation and whether this is related to psychological indicators of outcome.

Method

Illness perceptions and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were measured upon entry to (T0) and completion of (T1) a 3-month outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program in 158 cardiac patients.

Results

Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that all illness perceptions other than timeline and personal control changed significantly over the course of cardiac rehabilitation. Overall, cardiac rehabilitation patients came to view their illness as more benign. Further analysis revealed that perceiving fewer emotional consequences of the illness, gaining a better understanding, and attributing fewer symptoms to the illness at the end of cardiac rehabilitation, was related to better HRQOL.

Conclusion

Illness perceptions change during cardiac rehabilitation and these changes are associated with enhanced quality of life. Clinical trials have shown illness beliefs in cardiac patients to be modifiable during hospital admission; our results suggest that cardiac rehabilitation may provide a second window of opportunity during which illness perceptions can be actively monitored and modified if maladaptive.

Keywords

Cardiac rehabilitation Coronary heart disease Illness perceptions Quality of life 

References

  1. 1.
    Balady GJ, Williams M, Ades P, Bittner V, Comoss P, Foody JM, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update. A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils o. Circulation. 2007;115(20):2675–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organisation. Needs and action priorities in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in patients with CHD. Geneva: WHO; 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dusseldorp E, Meulman J, Kraaij V, van Elderen T, Maes S. A meta-analysis of psychoeduational programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychol. 1999;18(5):506–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jolliffe J, Rees K, Taylor RS, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online). 2001;(1):CD001800.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116(10):682–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, McAlister FA. Meta-Analysis: Secondary Prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(9):659–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linden W, Phillips MJ, Leclerc J. Psychological treatment of cardiac patients: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(24):2972–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny CLM. Quality of life studies: definitions and conceptual issues. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 11–23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leventhal H, Colman S. Quality of life: a process view. Psychol Heal. 1997;12:753–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leventhal H, Leventhal E, Contrada R. Self-regulation, health, and behavior: a perceptual–cognitive approach. Psychol Heal. 1998;13(4):717–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hagger MS, Orbell S. A meta-analytic review of the common-sense model of illness representations. Psychol Heal. 2003;18(2):141–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stafford L, Berk M, Jackson HJ. Are illness perceptions about coronary artery disease predictive of depression and quality of life outcomes? J Psychosom Res. 2009;66(3):211–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    French DP, Lewin RJP, Watson N, Thompson DR. Do illness perceptions predict attendance at cardiac rehabilitation and quality of life following myocardial infarction? J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(5):315–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grace SL, Krepostman S, Brooks D, Arthur H, Scholey P, Suskin N, et al. Illness perceptions among cardiac patients: relation to depressive symptomatology and sex. J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(3):153–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dickens C, McGowan L, Percival C, Tomenson B, Cotter L, Heagerty A, et al. Negative illness perceptions are associated with new-onset depression following myocardial infarction. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(5):414–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayou R, Bryant B. Quality of life in cardiovascular disease. B Heart J. 1993;69(5):460–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roebuck A, Furze G, Thompson DR. Health-related quality of life after myocardial infarction: an interview study. J Adv Nurs. 2001;34(6):787–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Worcester MUC, Murphy BM, Elliott PC, Le Grande MR, Higgins RO, Goble AJ, et al. Trajectories of recovery of quality of life in women after an acute cardiac event. Br J Heal Psychol. 2007;12(Pt 1):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oldridge N, Guyatt G, Jones N, Crowe J, Singer J, Feeny D, et al. Effects on quality of life with comprehensive rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67(13):1084–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Devcich DA, Ellis CJ, Gamble G, Petrie KJ. Psychological responses to cardiac diagnosis: changes in illness representations immediately following coronary angiography. J Psychosom Res. 2008;65(6):553–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rutter CL, Rutter DR. Longitudinal analysis of the illness representation model in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). J Heal Psychol. 2007;12(1):141–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foster NE, Bishop A, Thomas E, Main C, Horne R, Weinman J, et al. Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: what are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome? Pain. 2008;136:177–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lawson VL, Bundy C, Harvey JN. The development of personal models of diabetes in the first 2 years after diagnosis: a prospective longitudinal study. Diabet Med. 2008;25(4):482–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bijsterbosch J, Scharloo M, Visser AW, Watt I, Meulenbelt I, Huizinga TWJ, et al. Illness perceptions in patients with osteoarthritis: change over time and association with disability. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(8):1054–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petrie KJ, Weinman J. Perceptions of health and illness: Current research and applications. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alsen P, Brink E, Persson LO, Brandstrom Y, Karlson BW. Myocardial infarction relations to fatigue, emotional distress, and health-related quality of life. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010;25(2):E1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Petrie KJ, Cameron LD, Ellis CJ, Buick D, Weinman J. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2002;64(4):580–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Broadbent E, Ellis CJ, Thomas J, Gamble G, Petrie KJ. Further development of an illness perception intervention for myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67(1):17–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60(6):631–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    De Raaij EJ, Schröder C, Maissan FJ, Pool JJ, Wittink H. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire–Dutch Language Version. Man Ther. 2012;17(4):330–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hillers TK, Guyatt GH, Oldridge N, Crowe J, Willan A, Griffith L, et al. Quality of life after myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1287–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    De Gucht V, Van Elderen T, Van der Kamp L, Oldridge N. Quality of life after myocardial infarction: translation and validation of the MacNew questionnaire for a Dutch population. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(8):1483–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maes S, De Gucht V, Goud R, Hellemans I, Peek N. Is the MacNew quality of life questionnaire a useful diagnostic and evaluation instrument for cardiac rehabilitation? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008;15(5):516–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    NHS/NVVC Nederlandse Vereniging voor Cardiologie Revalidatiecommissie & Nederlandse Hartstichting. Multidisciplinaire Richtlijn Hartrevalidatie. Utrecht, Drukkerij Pascal: 2011.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Erdfelder E. G * Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goulding L, Furze G, Birks Y. Randomized controlled trials of interventions to change maladaptive illness beliefs in people with coronary heart disease: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(5):946–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blankenstein AH, van der Horst E, Schilte AF, de Vries D, Zaat JOM, Knottnerus A, et al. Development and feasibility of a modified reattribution model for somatising patients, applied by their own general practitioners. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;47(3):229–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Goldberg D, Gask L, O’Dowd T. The treatment of somatization: teaching techniques of reattribution. J Psychosom Res. 1989;33(6):689–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    French DP, Cooper A, Weinman J. Illness perceptions predict attendance at cardiac rehabilitation following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2006;61(6):757–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dickens C, McGowan L, Percival C, Tomenson B, Cotter L, Heagerty A, et al. Negative illness perceptions are associated with new-onset depression following myocardial infarction. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(5):414–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Van Oort L, Schröder C, French DP. What do people think about when they answer the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire? A “think-aloud” study. Br J Heal Psychol. 2011;16(Pt 2):231–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    French DP, Schröder C, van Oort L. The Brief IPQ does not have “robust psychometrics”: why there is a need for further developmental work on the Brief IPQ, and why our study provides a useful start. Br J Heal Psychol. 2011;16:250–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Broadbent E, Kaptein AA, Petrie KJ. Double Dutch: the “think-aloud” Brief IPQ study uses a Dutch translation with confusing wording and the wrong instructions. Br J Heal Psychol. 2011;16:246–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie K, Horne R, Cameron L, Buick D. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Heal. 2002;17(1):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronica Janssen
    • 1
    • 4
  • Véronique De Gucht
    • 1
  • Henk van Exel
    • 2
  • Stan Maes
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Health PsychologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Rijnlands Rehabilitation CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Leiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Health PsychologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations