International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 413–424 | Cite as

Effect of a Telephone-Delivered Coronary Heart Disease Secondary Prevention Program (ProActive Heart) on Quality of Life and Health Behaviours: Primary Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial

  • Anna L. Hawkes
  • Tania A. Patrao
  • John Atherton
  • Robert S. Ware
  • Craig B. Taylor
  • Adrienne O’Neil
  • Rachelle Foreman
  • Brian F. Oldenburg
Article

Abstract

Background

Participation in coronary heart disease secondary prevention programs is low. Innovative programs to meet this treatment gap are required.

Purpose

To aim of this study is to describe the effectiveness of a telephone-delivered secondary prevention program for myocardial infarction patients.

Methods

Four hundred and thirty adult myocardial infarction patients in Brisbane, Australia were randomised to a 6-month secondary prevention program or usual care. Primary outcomes were health-related quality of life (Short Form-36) and physical activity (Active Australia Survey).

Results

Significant intervention effects were observed for health-related quality of life on the mental component summary score (p = 0.02), and the social functioning (p = 0.04) and role-emotional (p = 0.03) subscales, compared with usual care. Intervention participants were also more likely to meet recommended levels of physical activity (p = 0.02), body mass index (p = 0.05), vegetable intake (p = 0.04) and alcohol consumption (p = 0.05).

Conclusions

Telephone-delivered secondary prevention programs can significantly improve health outcomes and could meet the treatment gap for myocardial infarction patients.

Keywords

Myocardial infarction Secondary prevention Telephone Intervention Health-related quality of life Physical activity Health behaviours 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council project grant #443222. Adrienne O’Neil is supported by a Post Graduate Award from the National Heart Foundation of Australia (PP 08 M4079). The funding bodies had no role in the design or conduct of the study, data extraction or data analyses. We thank The Prince Charles Hospital and Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital staff for their support of the study, and acknowledge the dedicated work of our health coaches, Dr Dominique Bird, Ms Brigid Hanley and Ms Bernice Kelly, as well as our telephone interviewers. We thank our research investigators, Professor Paul Scuffam, Ms Nancy Houston Miller and Professor John Bett. We are also grateful for Associate Professor Darren Walters’ support of the study.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith Jr SC, Allen J, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Fonarow GC, et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 Update: endorsed by the national heart, lung, and blood institute. Circulation. 2006;113(19):2363–72. May 16, 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Piepoli MF, Corrà U, Benzer W, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Dendale P, Gaita D, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European association of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(1):1–17. 0.1097/HJR.0b013e3283313592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, McAlister FA. Meta-analysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(9):659–72. November 1, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joliffe J, Rees K, Taylor R, Thompson D, Oldridge N, Ebrahim S. Exercise-based rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Review In: The Cochrane Library. 2003(1):1–41.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briffa T, Kinsman L, Maiorana AJ, Zecchin R, Redfern J, Davidson PM, et al. An integrated and coordinated approach to preventing recurrent coronary heart disease events in Australia. MJA. 2009;190:683–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies P, Taylor F, Beswick A, Wise F, Moxham T, Rees K, et al. Promoting patient uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation. The Cochrane Library. 2010(7).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott IA, Lindsay KA, Harden HE. Utilisation of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Queensland. Med J Aust. 2003;179(7):341–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daly J, Sindone AP, Thompson DR, Hancock K, Chang E, Davidson P. Barriers to participation in and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs: a critical literature review. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002;17:8–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gurewich D, Prottas J, Bhalotra S, Suaya JA, Shepard DS. System-level factors and use of cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(6):380–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    British Heart Foundation. National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation 2011: an annual, BHF funded report into the provision and uptake of cardiac rehabilitation across England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allen JK, Dennison CR. Randomized trials of nursing interventions for secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure: systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010;25(3):207–20. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181cc79be.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neubeck L, Redfern Ju, Fernandez R, Briffa T, Bauman A, Freedman SB. Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2009;16(3):281–9. June 1, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blair J, Corrigal H, Angus NJ, Thompson DR, Leslie S. Home versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Rural Remote Heal. 2011;11(2):1532–49. Apr–Jun Epub Apr 6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Redfern J, Briffa T, Ellis E, Freedman SB. Patient-centered modular secondary prevention following acute coronary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(2):107–15. quiz 16–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stewart S, Inglis S, Hawkes A. Chronic cardiac care: A guide to specialist nurse management. London: Blackwell BMJ Books; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Worcester MUC, Le Grande MR. The role of cardiac rehabilitation in influencing psychological outcomes. Stress Heal. 2008;24(3):267–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heran BS, Chen JMH, Ebrahim S, Moxham T, Oldridge N, Rees K, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. doi: 1002/14651858.CD001800.pub2. Issue 7. Art. No.: CD001800.
  18. 18.
    Hawkes AL, Atherton J, Taylor CB, Scuffham P, Eadie K. Houston Miller N, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a secondary prevention program for myocardial infarction patients ('ProActive Heart'): study protocol. Secondary prevention program for myocardial infarction patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9:16–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. MJA. 2006;184:S1–S30.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Heart Foundation Australia Website. Available from: http://www.heartfoundation.org.au/Heart_Information/Information_by_Phone/Pages/default.aspx.
  21. 21.
    Painter JE, Borba CP, Hynes M, Mays D, Glanz K. The use of theory in health behaviour research from 2000 to 2005: a systematic review. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35:358–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1977.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bunker SJ, Colquhoun DM, Esler MD, Hickie IB, Hunt D, Jelinek M, et al. "Stress" and coronary heart disease: psychosocial risk factors. Med J Aust. 2003;178:272–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Reducing risk in heart disease: guidelines for preventing cardiovascular events in people with coronary heart disease. National Heart Foundation of Australia; 2003.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Reducing risk in heart disease 2007 (updated 2008).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Heart Foundation of Australia. My Heart My Life: a manual for patients with coronary heart disease. National Heart Foundation of Australia; 2007.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hawthorne G, Osborne RH, Taylor A, Sansoni J. The SF36 version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(4):661–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dempster M, Donnelly M. Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease. Heart. 2000;83(6):641–4. June 1, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, Wells K, Rogers WH, Berry SD, et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 1989;262(7):907–13. August 18, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). The Active Australia Survey: a guide and manual for implementation, analysis and reporting. Canberra: AIHW2003.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Timperio A, Salmon J, Crawford D. Validity and reliability of a physical activity recall instrument among overweight and non-overweight men and women. J Sc Med Sport/Sports Med Aust. 2003;6(4):477–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Heesch KC, Hill RL, van Uffelen JGZ, Brown WJ. Are active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults? J Sci Med Sport. 2010;14(3):233–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brown WJ, Trost SG, Bauman A, Mummery K, Owen N. Test–retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveys. J Sci Med Sport/Sports Med Aus. 2004;7(2):205–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hodge A, Patterson AJ, Brown WJ, Ireland P, Giles G. The Anti Cancer Council of Victoria FFQ: relative validity of nutrient intakes compared with weighed food records in young to middle-aged women in a study of iron supplementation. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000;24(6):576–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ.340.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hoffman BM, Babyak MA, Craighead WE, Sherwood A, Doraiswamy PM, Coons MJ, et al. Exercise and pharmacotherapy in patients with major depression: one-year follow-up of the SMILE study. Psychosom Med. 2011;73(2):127–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vale MJ, Jelinek MV, Best JD, Dart AM, Grigg LE, Hare DL, et al. Coaching patients On Achieving Cardiovascular Health (COACH): a multicenter randomized trial in patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(22):2775–83. December 8, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 1996.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goode AD, Reeves MM, Eakin EG. Telephone-delivered interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change: an updated systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(1):81–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Waters LA, Reeves MM, Fjeldsoe BS, Eakin EG. Characteristics of control group participants who increased their physical activity in a cluster-randomized lifestyle intervention trial. BMC Publ Health. 2011;11:27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sjostrom O, Holst D. Validity of a questionnaire survey: response patterns in different subgroups and the effect of social desirability. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60(3):136–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shephard RJ. Regression to the mean. A threat to exercise science? Sports Med. 2003;33(8):575–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van Sluijs EM, van Poppel MN, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W. Physical activity measurements affected participants' behavior in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(4):404–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Coyne T, Ibiebele TI, McNaughton S, Rutishauser IHE, O'Dea K, Hodge AM, et al. Evaluation of brief dietary questions to estimate vegetable and fruit consumption? Using serum carotenoids and red-cell folate. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(03):298–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna L. Hawkes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tania A. Patrao
    • 1
  • John Atherton
    • 3
  • Robert S. Ware
    • 4
  • Craig B. Taylor
    • 5
  • Adrienne O’Neil
    • 6
  • Rachelle Foreman
    • 7
  • Brian F. Oldenburg
    • 6
  1. 1.Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer ControlCancer Council QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Public HealthQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of CardiologyThe Royal Brisbane and Women’s HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.School of Population HealthThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  5. 5.Stanford Medical SchoolStanford UniversityCaliforniaUSA
  6. 6.School of Public Health and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  7. 7.National Heart Foundation of AustraliaBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations