Relationships of Personality Factors to Perceived Stress, Depression, and Oral Lichen Planus Severity
- 619 Downloads
The objective of this study is to examine relationships of hardiness and big five personality factors to depression, perceived stress, and oral lichen planus (OLP) severity.
Sixty Iranian patients with oral lichen planus completed measures of perceived stress, hardiness, big five, and depression.
Linear regressions revealed that control and challenge significantly predicted least perceived stress. On the contrary, big five factor of neuroticism predicted more perceived stress. Furthermore, control, commitment, and extraversion negatively predicted depression levels, but neuroticism positively predicted depression levels. Additionally, more levels of the challenge factor predicted fewer OLP scores while more levels of perceived stress predicted more OLP scores.
The components of control challenge and neuroticism factors had a significant role in predicting perceived stress. On the other hand, the components of control and commitment and extraversion factors had a prominent role in predicting depression in patients with OLP, so personality constructs may have an effective role in triggering experience of stress, depression, and OLP itself. Additionally, interventions that enhance individual protective factors may be beneficial in reducing stress and depression in some severe diseases.
KeywordsHardiness Big five Perceived stress Depression Oral lichen planus
- 2.Cortés-Ramírez DA, Gainza-Cirauqui ML, Echebarria-Goikouria MA, Aguirre-Urízar JM. Enfermedad liquenoide oral como condición premaligna: controversias e incógnitas. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:145–9.Google Scholar
- 9.Kobasa SC, Maddi SR. Existential personality theory. In: Corsini R, editor. Current personality theories. Itasca: Peacock Publishers; 1983.Google Scholar
- 14.Buss DM. Social adaptation and five major factors of personality. In: Wiggins JS, editor. The five-factor model of personality: theoretical perspectives. New York: The Guilford Press; 1996. p. 180–207.Google Scholar
- 17.Smith TW, Gallo LC. Personality traits as risk factors for physical illness. In: Baum A, Revenson T, Singer J, editors. Handbook of health psychology. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 2001. p. 139–72.Google Scholar
- 20.Cohen S, Williamson G. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the U.S. In: Spacapam S, Oskamp S, editors. The social psychology of health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988. p. 31–67.Google Scholar
- 21.Besharat MA. Reliability and validity of the Hardiness Scale. J Psychol Sci. 2007;21:24–35 [Farsi].Google Scholar
- 22.Costa PTJ, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): professional manual. Odessa: Psychol Assess Res; 1992.Google Scholar
- 23.Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. Stress and the immune system: human studies. In: Annual review of pyschiatry. Washington: American Psychiatric Press, Inc; 1991.Google Scholar
- 25.Maes M, Van Gastel A, Delmeire L, Kenis G, Bosmans E, Song C. Platelet alpha2-adrenoceptor density in humans: relationships to stress-induced anxiety, psychasthenic constitution, gender and stress-induced changes in the inflammatory response system. Psychol Med. 2002;32:919–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Maddi SR, Khoshaba DM, Jensen K, Carter E, Lu JL, Harvey RH. Hardiness training for high-risk undergraduates. Nat Acad Advis Assoc J. 2002;22(1):45–55.Google Scholar