Advertisement

Organizational Justice and Psychological Distress Among Permanent and Non-permanent Employees in Japan: A Prospective Cohort Study

  • Akiomi Inoue
  • Norito Kawakami
  • Kanami Tsuno
  • Kimiko Tomioka
  • Mayuko Nakanishi
Article

Abstract

Background

Organizational justice has recently been introduced as a new concept as psychosocial determinants of employee health, and an increase in precarious employment is a challenging issue in occupational health. However, no study investigated the association of organizational justice with mental health among employees while taking into account employment contract.

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prospective association of organizational justice (procedural justice and interactional justice) with psychological distress by employment contract among Japanese employees.

Methods

A total of 373 males and 644 females from five branches of a manufacturing company in Japan were surveyed. At baseline (August 2009), self-administered questionnaires, including the Organizational Justice Questionnaire (OJQ), the K6 scale (psychological distress scale), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R), and other covariates, were used. After one-year follow-up (August 2010), the K6 scale was used again to assess psychological distress. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted by sex and employment contract.

Results

After adjusting for demographic characteristics, psychological distress, and neuroticism at baseline, low procedural justice was significantly associated with a higher risk of psychological distress at follow-up among non-permanent female employees, while no significant association of procedural justice or interactional justice with psychological distress at follow-up was observed among permanent male or female employees. The results of non-permanent male employees could not be calculated because of small sample size.

Conclusions

Low procedural justice may be an important predictor of psychological distress among non-permanent female employees.

Keywords

Procedural justice Interactional justice Mental health Precarious employment Longitudinal study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) 2009 and 2010 (No. 20240062) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. The preparation of the manuscript was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Research in a Proposed Research Area) 2011 (No. 4102-21119001) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

References

  1. 1.
    Bourbonnais R. Are job stress models capturing important dimensions of the psychosocial work environment? Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(10):640–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24(2):285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health. 1988;78(10):1336–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1(1):27–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams JS. Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowits L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 2. New York: Academic Press; 1965. p. 267–99.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thibaut J, Walker L. Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1975.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leventhal GS. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R, editors. Social exchange: advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum Press; 1980. p. 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bies RJ, Moag JS. Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH, editors. Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 1. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1986. p. 43–55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moorman RH. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J Appl Psychol. 1991;76(6):845–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawachi I. Injustice at work and health: causation or correlation? Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(9):578–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J, Virtanen M, Stansfeld SA. Association between organizational inequity and incidence of psychiatric disorders in female employees. Psychol Med. 2003;33(2):319–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ylipaavalniemi J, Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Virtanen M, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Vahtera J. Psychosocial work characteristics and incidence of newly diagnosed depression: a prospective cohort study of three different models. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(1):111–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M, Virtanen M, Siegrist J. Effort–reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: complementary or redundant models? Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(10):659–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J. Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(1):105–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J, Ferrie JE. Organisational justice and health of employees: prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(1):27–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrie JE, Head J, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG, Kivimäki M. Injustice at work and incidence of psychiatric morbidity: the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(7):443–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Inoue A, Kawakami N, Ishizaki M, Shimazu A, Tsuchiya M, Tabata M, et al. Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010;83(1):29–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hayashi T, Odagiri Y, Ohya Y, Tanaka K, Shimomitsu T. Organizational justice, willingness to work, and psychological distress: results from a private Japanese company. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(2):174–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quinlan M, Mayhew C, Bohle P. The global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganization, and consequences for occupational health: a review of recent research. Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(2):335–414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim MH, Kim CY, Park JK, Kawachi I. Is precarious employment damaging to self-rated health? Results of propensity score matching methods, using longitudinal data in South Korea. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(12):1982–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kompier M, Ybema JF, Janssen J, Taris T. Employment contracts: cross-sectional and longitudinal relations with quality of working life, health and well-being. J Occup Health. 2009;51(3):193–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Inoue A, Kawakami N, Tsuchiya M, Sakurai K, Hashimoto H. Association of occupation, employment contract, and company size with mental health in a national representative sample of employees in Japan. J Occup Health. 2010;52(4):227–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Virtanen P, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Ferrie J. Employment security and health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(8):569–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van den Bos K, Lind EA. Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 34. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002. p. 1–60.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van den Bos K. Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;80(6):931–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    van den Bos K, Miedema J. Toward understanding why fairness matters: the influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(3):355–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Elovainio M, van den Bos K, Linna A, Kivimäki M, Ala-Mursula L, Pentti J, et al. Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(12):2501–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kausto J, Elo AL, Lipponen J, Elovainio M. Moderating effects of job insecurity in the relationships between procedural justice and employee well-being: gender differences. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2005;14(4):431–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aizzat MN, Ramayah T, Kumaresan S. Organizational stressors and job stress among managers: the moderating role of neuroticism. Singapore Manage Rev. 2005;27(2):63–79.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Inoue A, Kawakami N, Tsutsumi A, Shimazu A, Tsuchiya M, Ishizaki M, et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Organizational Justice Questionnaire. J Occup Health. 2009;51(1):74–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Furukawa TA, Kawakami N, Saitoh M, Ono Y, Nakane Y, Nakamura Y, et al. The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(3):152–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sakurai K, Nishi A, Kondo K, Yanagida K, Kawakami N. Screening performance of K6/K10 and other screening instruments for mood and anxiety disorders in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;65(5):434–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Survey on fixed-term employment contract 2009. Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan; 2009. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weathers C. Nonregular workers and inequality in Japan. Soc Sci Jpn J. 2009;12(1):143–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ, Barrett P. A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Person Individ Diff. 1985;6(1):21–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hosokawa T, Ohyama M. Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the short-form Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised. Psychol Rep. 1993;72(3):823–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Karasek R. Job Content Questionnaire and user's guide. Lowell: University of Massachusetts at Lowell; 1985.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kawakami N, Kobayashi F, Araki S, Haratani T, Furui H. Assessment of job stress dimensions based on the job demands-control model of employees of telecommunication and electric power companies in Japan: reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Job Content Questionnaire. Int J Behav Med. 1995;2(4):358–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, et al. The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(8):1483–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tsutsumi A, Ishitake T, Peter R, Siegrist J, Matoba T. The Japanese version of the Effort–Reward Imbalance Questionnaire: a study in dental technicians. Work Stress. 2001;15(1):86–96.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fisher S. Stress, control, worry prescriptions and the implications for health at work: a psychological model. In: Sauter SL, Hurrell JA, Cooper CL, editors. Job control and worker health. Chichester: Wiley; 1989. p. 205–36.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. White paper on the labour economy 2003. Tokyo: The Japan Institute of Labour; 2003. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fujishiro K, Heaney CA. Justice at work, job stress, and employee health. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36(3):487–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kulik CT, Lind EA, Ambrose ML, MacCoun RJ. Understanding gender differences in distributive and procedural justice. Soc Justice Res. 1996;9(4):351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tata J, Bowes-Sperry L. Emphasis on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice: differential perceptions of men and women. Psychol Rep. 1996;79(3):1327–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sweeney PD, McFarlin DB. Process and outcome: gender differences in the assessment of justice. J Organ Behav. 1997;18(1):83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lee C, Farh J. The effect of gender in organizational justice perception. J Organ Behav. 1999;20(1):130–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cross SE, Madson L. Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychol Bull. 1997;122(1):5–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tyler TR, Lind EA. A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25. New York: Academic Press; 1992. p. 115–91.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Brockner J, De Cremer D, van den Bos K, Chen Y. The influence of interdependent self-construal on procedural fairness effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2005;96(2):155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li A, Bagger J. Role ambiguity and self-efficacy: the moderating effects of goal orientation and procedural justice. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73(3):368–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akiomi Inoue
    • 1
  • Norito Kawakami
    • 2
  • Kanami Tsuno
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kimiko Tomioka
    • 4
  • Mayuko Nakanishi
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Mental Health, Institute of Industrial Ecological SciencesUniversity of Occupational and Environmental HealthKitakyushuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Community Health and EpidemiologyNara Medical UniversityKashiharaJapan
  5. 5.Nakanishi Healthcare OfficeYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations